Cargando…

Detection of HPV DNA in paraffin-embedded cervical samples: a comparison of four genotyping methods

BACKGROUND: Identification of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in cervical tissue is important for understanding cervical carcinogenesis and for evaluating cervical cancer prevention approaches. However, HPV genotyping using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues is technically challenging....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Castro, Felipe A., Koshiol, Jill, Quint, Wim, Wheeler, Cosette M., Gillison, Maura L., Vaughan, Laurence M., Kleter, Bernhard, van Doorn, Leen-Jan, Chaturvedi, Anil K., Hildesheim, Allan, Schiffman, Mark, Wang, Sophia S., Zuna, Rosemary E., Walker, Joan L., Dunn, S. Terence, Wentzensen, Nicolas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4660657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26607224
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-1281-5
_version_ 1782402844487319552
author Castro, Felipe A.
Koshiol, Jill
Quint, Wim
Wheeler, Cosette M.
Gillison, Maura L.
Vaughan, Laurence M.
Kleter, Bernhard
van Doorn, Leen-Jan
Chaturvedi, Anil K.
Hildesheim, Allan
Schiffman, Mark
Wang, Sophia S.
Zuna, Rosemary E.
Walker, Joan L.
Dunn, S. Terence
Wentzensen, Nicolas
author_facet Castro, Felipe A.
Koshiol, Jill
Quint, Wim
Wheeler, Cosette M.
Gillison, Maura L.
Vaughan, Laurence M.
Kleter, Bernhard
van Doorn, Leen-Jan
Chaturvedi, Anil K.
Hildesheim, Allan
Schiffman, Mark
Wang, Sophia S.
Zuna, Rosemary E.
Walker, Joan L.
Dunn, S. Terence
Wentzensen, Nicolas
author_sort Castro, Felipe A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Identification of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in cervical tissue is important for understanding cervical carcinogenesis and for evaluating cervical cancer prevention approaches. However, HPV genotyping using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues is technically challenging. We evaluated the performance of four commonly used genotyping methods on FFPE cervical specimens conducted in different laboratories and compared to genotyping results from cytological samples. METHODS: We included 60 pairs of exfoliated-cell and FFPE specimens from women with histologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial lesions grade 2 or 3. Cytology specimens were genotyped using the Linear Array assay. Four expert laboratories processed tissue specimens using different preparation methods and then genotyped the resultant sample preparations using four different HPV genotyping methods: SPF(10)-PCR DEIA LiPA(25) (version 1), Inno-LiPA, Linear Array and the Onclarity assay. Percentage agreement, kappa statistics and McNemar’s chi-square were calculated for each comparison of different methods and specimen types. RESULTS: Overall agreement with respect to carcinogenic HPV status for FFPE samples between different methods was: 81.7, 86.7 and 91.7 % for Onclarity versus Inno-LiPA, Linear Array and SPF-LiPA(25), respectively; 81.7 and 85.0 % for Linear Array versus Inno-LiPA and SPF-LiPA(25), respectively; and 86.7 % for SPF-LiPA(25) versus Inno-LiPA. Type-specific agreement was >88.3 % for all pair-wise comparisons. Comparisons with cytology specimens resulted in overall agreements from 80 to 95 % depending on the method and type-specific agreement was >90 % for most comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that the four genotyping methods run by expert laboratories reliably detect HPV DNA in FFPE specimens with some variation in genotype-specific detection. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-015-1281-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4660657
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46606572015-11-27 Detection of HPV DNA in paraffin-embedded cervical samples: a comparison of four genotyping methods Castro, Felipe A. Koshiol, Jill Quint, Wim Wheeler, Cosette M. Gillison, Maura L. Vaughan, Laurence M. Kleter, Bernhard van Doorn, Leen-Jan Chaturvedi, Anil K. Hildesheim, Allan Schiffman, Mark Wang, Sophia S. Zuna, Rosemary E. Walker, Joan L. Dunn, S. Terence Wentzensen, Nicolas BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Identification of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in cervical tissue is important for understanding cervical carcinogenesis and for evaluating cervical cancer prevention approaches. However, HPV genotyping using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues is technically challenging. We evaluated the performance of four commonly used genotyping methods on FFPE cervical specimens conducted in different laboratories and compared to genotyping results from cytological samples. METHODS: We included 60 pairs of exfoliated-cell and FFPE specimens from women with histologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial lesions grade 2 or 3. Cytology specimens were genotyped using the Linear Array assay. Four expert laboratories processed tissue specimens using different preparation methods and then genotyped the resultant sample preparations using four different HPV genotyping methods: SPF(10)-PCR DEIA LiPA(25) (version 1), Inno-LiPA, Linear Array and the Onclarity assay. Percentage agreement, kappa statistics and McNemar’s chi-square were calculated for each comparison of different methods and specimen types. RESULTS: Overall agreement with respect to carcinogenic HPV status for FFPE samples between different methods was: 81.7, 86.7 and 91.7 % for Onclarity versus Inno-LiPA, Linear Array and SPF-LiPA(25), respectively; 81.7 and 85.0 % for Linear Array versus Inno-LiPA and SPF-LiPA(25), respectively; and 86.7 % for SPF-LiPA(25) versus Inno-LiPA. Type-specific agreement was >88.3 % for all pair-wise comparisons. Comparisons with cytology specimens resulted in overall agreements from 80 to 95 % depending on the method and type-specific agreement was >90 % for most comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that the four genotyping methods run by expert laboratories reliably detect HPV DNA in FFPE specimens with some variation in genotype-specific detection. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-015-1281-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4660657/ /pubmed/26607224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-1281-5 Text en © Castro et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Castro, Felipe A.
Koshiol, Jill
Quint, Wim
Wheeler, Cosette M.
Gillison, Maura L.
Vaughan, Laurence M.
Kleter, Bernhard
van Doorn, Leen-Jan
Chaturvedi, Anil K.
Hildesheim, Allan
Schiffman, Mark
Wang, Sophia S.
Zuna, Rosemary E.
Walker, Joan L.
Dunn, S. Terence
Wentzensen, Nicolas
Detection of HPV DNA in paraffin-embedded cervical samples: a comparison of four genotyping methods
title Detection of HPV DNA in paraffin-embedded cervical samples: a comparison of four genotyping methods
title_full Detection of HPV DNA in paraffin-embedded cervical samples: a comparison of four genotyping methods
title_fullStr Detection of HPV DNA in paraffin-embedded cervical samples: a comparison of four genotyping methods
title_full_unstemmed Detection of HPV DNA in paraffin-embedded cervical samples: a comparison of four genotyping methods
title_short Detection of HPV DNA in paraffin-embedded cervical samples: a comparison of four genotyping methods
title_sort detection of hpv dna in paraffin-embedded cervical samples: a comparison of four genotyping methods
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4660657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26607224
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-1281-5
work_keys_str_mv AT castrofelipea detectionofhpvdnainparaffinembeddedcervicalsamplesacomparisonoffourgenotypingmethods
AT koshioljill detectionofhpvdnainparaffinembeddedcervicalsamplesacomparisonoffourgenotypingmethods
AT quintwim detectionofhpvdnainparaffinembeddedcervicalsamplesacomparisonoffourgenotypingmethods
AT wheelercosettem detectionofhpvdnainparaffinembeddedcervicalsamplesacomparisonoffourgenotypingmethods
AT gillisonmaural detectionofhpvdnainparaffinembeddedcervicalsamplesacomparisonoffourgenotypingmethods
AT vaughanlaurencem detectionofhpvdnainparaffinembeddedcervicalsamplesacomparisonoffourgenotypingmethods
AT kleterbernhard detectionofhpvdnainparaffinembeddedcervicalsamplesacomparisonoffourgenotypingmethods
AT vandoornleenjan detectionofhpvdnainparaffinembeddedcervicalsamplesacomparisonoffourgenotypingmethods
AT chaturvedianilk detectionofhpvdnainparaffinembeddedcervicalsamplesacomparisonoffourgenotypingmethods
AT hildesheimallan detectionofhpvdnainparaffinembeddedcervicalsamplesacomparisonoffourgenotypingmethods
AT schiffmanmark detectionofhpvdnainparaffinembeddedcervicalsamplesacomparisonoffourgenotypingmethods
AT wangsophias detectionofhpvdnainparaffinembeddedcervicalsamplesacomparisonoffourgenotypingmethods
AT zunarosemarye detectionofhpvdnainparaffinembeddedcervicalsamplesacomparisonoffourgenotypingmethods
AT walkerjoanl detectionofhpvdnainparaffinembeddedcervicalsamplesacomparisonoffourgenotypingmethods
AT dunnsterence detectionofhpvdnainparaffinembeddedcervicalsamplesacomparisonoffourgenotypingmethods
AT wentzensennicolas detectionofhpvdnainparaffinembeddedcervicalsamplesacomparisonoffourgenotypingmethods