Cargando…

Engaging families in physical activity research: a family-based focus group study

BACKGROUND: Family-based interventions present a much-needed opportunity to increase children’s physical activity levels. However, little is known about how best to engage parents and their children in physical activity research. This study aimed to engage with the whole family to understand how bes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brown, Helen Elizabeth, Schiff, Annie, van Sluijs, Esther M. F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4660685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26607429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2497-4
_version_ 1782402850622537728
author Brown, Helen Elizabeth
Schiff, Annie
van Sluijs, Esther M. F.
author_facet Brown, Helen Elizabeth
Schiff, Annie
van Sluijs, Esther M. F.
author_sort Brown, Helen Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Family-based interventions present a much-needed opportunity to increase children’s physical activity levels. However, little is known about how best to engage parents and their children in physical activity research. This study aimed to engage with the whole family to understand how best to recruit for, and retain participation in, physical activity research. METHODS: Families (including a ‘target’ child aged between 8 and 11 years, their parents, siblings, and others) were recruited through schools and community groups. Focus groups were conducted using a semi-structured approach (informed by a pilot session). Families were asked to order cards listing the possible benefits of, and the barriers to, being involved in physical activity research and other health promotion activities, highlighting the items they consider most relevant, and suggesting additional items. Duplicate content analysis was used to identify transcript themes and develop a coding frame. RESULTS: Eighty-two participants from 17 families participated, including 17 ‘target’ children (mean age 9.3 ± 1.1 years, 61.1 % female), 32 other children and 33 adults (including parents, grandparents, and older siblings). Social, health and educational benefits were cited as being key incentives for involvement in physical activity research, with emphasis on children experiencing new things, developing character, and increasing social contact (particularly for shy children). Children’s enjoyment was also given priority. The provision of child care or financial reward was not considered sufficiently appealing. Increased time commitment or scheduling difficulties were quoted as the most pertinent barriers to involvement (especially for families with several children), but parents commented these could be overcome if the potential value for children was clear. CONCLUSIONS: Lessons learned from this work may contribute to the development of effective recruitment and retention strategies for children and their families. Making the wide range of potential benefits clear to families, providing regular feedback, and carefully considering family structure, may prove useful in achieving desired research participation. This may subsequently assist in engaging families in interventions to increase physical activity in children.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4660685
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46606852015-11-27 Engaging families in physical activity research: a family-based focus group study Brown, Helen Elizabeth Schiff, Annie van Sluijs, Esther M. F. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Family-based interventions present a much-needed opportunity to increase children’s physical activity levels. However, little is known about how best to engage parents and their children in physical activity research. This study aimed to engage with the whole family to understand how best to recruit for, and retain participation in, physical activity research. METHODS: Families (including a ‘target’ child aged between 8 and 11 years, their parents, siblings, and others) were recruited through schools and community groups. Focus groups were conducted using a semi-structured approach (informed by a pilot session). Families were asked to order cards listing the possible benefits of, and the barriers to, being involved in physical activity research and other health promotion activities, highlighting the items they consider most relevant, and suggesting additional items. Duplicate content analysis was used to identify transcript themes and develop a coding frame. RESULTS: Eighty-two participants from 17 families participated, including 17 ‘target’ children (mean age 9.3 ± 1.1 years, 61.1 % female), 32 other children and 33 adults (including parents, grandparents, and older siblings). Social, health and educational benefits were cited as being key incentives for involvement in physical activity research, with emphasis on children experiencing new things, developing character, and increasing social contact (particularly for shy children). Children’s enjoyment was also given priority. The provision of child care or financial reward was not considered sufficiently appealing. Increased time commitment or scheduling difficulties were quoted as the most pertinent barriers to involvement (especially for families with several children), but parents commented these could be overcome if the potential value for children was clear. CONCLUSIONS: Lessons learned from this work may contribute to the development of effective recruitment and retention strategies for children and their families. Making the wide range of potential benefits clear to families, providing regular feedback, and carefully considering family structure, may prove useful in achieving desired research participation. This may subsequently assist in engaging families in interventions to increase physical activity in children. BioMed Central 2015-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4660685/ /pubmed/26607429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2497-4 Text en © Brown et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Brown, Helen Elizabeth
Schiff, Annie
van Sluijs, Esther M. F.
Engaging families in physical activity research: a family-based focus group study
title Engaging families in physical activity research: a family-based focus group study
title_full Engaging families in physical activity research: a family-based focus group study
title_fullStr Engaging families in physical activity research: a family-based focus group study
title_full_unstemmed Engaging families in physical activity research: a family-based focus group study
title_short Engaging families in physical activity research: a family-based focus group study
title_sort engaging families in physical activity research: a family-based focus group study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4660685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26607429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2497-4
work_keys_str_mv AT brownhelenelizabeth engagingfamiliesinphysicalactivityresearchafamilybasedfocusgroupstudy
AT schiffannie engagingfamiliesinphysicalactivityresearchafamilybasedfocusgroupstudy
AT vansluijsesthermf engagingfamiliesinphysicalactivityresearchafamilybasedfocusgroupstudy