Cargando…

Efficacy of bipolar “button” plasma vaporization of the prostate for benign prostatic obstruction, compared to the standard technique

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the following study is to evaluate the efficiency of transurethral plasma vaporization of the prostate in saline bipolar plasma vaporization of the prostate (BPVP) using the button electrode and comparing it to the standard transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Aboutaleb, Hamdy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4660693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26692662
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.152019
_version_ 1782402852505780224
author Aboutaleb, Hamdy
author_facet Aboutaleb, Hamdy
author_sort Aboutaleb, Hamdy
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objective of the following study is to evaluate the efficiency of transurethral plasma vaporization of the prostate in saline bipolar plasma vaporization of the prostate (BPVP) using the button electrode and comparing it to the standard transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: During the period of the year between 2007 and 2013, 152 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia were rolled in our study. Fifty-two patients were underwent BPVP and 100 TURP. All patients were evaluated preoperatively, 24 h and at 3 months postoperatively. International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS), quality-of-life (QOL) score, Qmax and Qave and post void residual (PVR) urine. Operative time, hospital stay, catheterization time, and complications were reported. Mean serum Hb, hematocrit and serum sodium changes were reported preoperatively and within 24 h postoperatively in both groups. Statistical analysis is performed using SPSS program version 20 for windows. RESULTS: Mean age at surgery was 60.8 ± 8 (range 63- 92) and 66 ± 8.6 (range 50-83) for BPVP and TURP groups, respectively. Mean prostatic volume was 46 ± 11 (range 30-92) and 43 ± 8 (range 30-80) in both groups, respectively. Patients from both series had similar preoperative characteristics. The mean operative duration 53 ± 21 1 ± 2.1 (range 1-7) versus 3 ± 3.3 (range 3-8) days (P value 0.0001) were significantly (range 20-80) versus 62 ± 16 min (range 30-126) (P value 0.004), catheterization period 2 ± 0.28 ( range 2-4) versus 3 ± 3.2 (range 2-7) days (P value 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: BPVP has superior efficacy in short-term results and less complication rates compared with classic TURP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4660693
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46606932015-12-11 Efficacy of bipolar “button” plasma vaporization of the prostate for benign prostatic obstruction, compared to the standard technique Aboutaleb, Hamdy Urol Ann Original Article OBJECTIVE: The objective of the following study is to evaluate the efficiency of transurethral plasma vaporization of the prostate in saline bipolar plasma vaporization of the prostate (BPVP) using the button electrode and comparing it to the standard transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: During the period of the year between 2007 and 2013, 152 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia were rolled in our study. Fifty-two patients were underwent BPVP and 100 TURP. All patients were evaluated preoperatively, 24 h and at 3 months postoperatively. International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS), quality-of-life (QOL) score, Qmax and Qave and post void residual (PVR) urine. Operative time, hospital stay, catheterization time, and complications were reported. Mean serum Hb, hematocrit and serum sodium changes were reported preoperatively and within 24 h postoperatively in both groups. Statistical analysis is performed using SPSS program version 20 for windows. RESULTS: Mean age at surgery was 60.8 ± 8 (range 63- 92) and 66 ± 8.6 (range 50-83) for BPVP and TURP groups, respectively. Mean prostatic volume was 46 ± 11 (range 30-92) and 43 ± 8 (range 30-80) in both groups, respectively. Patients from both series had similar preoperative characteristics. The mean operative duration 53 ± 21 1 ± 2.1 (range 1-7) versus 3 ± 3.3 (range 3-8) days (P value 0.0001) were significantly (range 20-80) versus 62 ± 16 min (range 30-126) (P value 0.004), catheterization period 2 ± 0.28 ( range 2-4) versus 3 ± 3.2 (range 2-7) days (P value 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: BPVP has superior efficacy in short-term results and less complication rates compared with classic TURP. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4660693/ /pubmed/26692662 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.152019 Text en Copyright: © Urology Annals http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Aboutaleb, Hamdy
Efficacy of bipolar “button” plasma vaporization of the prostate for benign prostatic obstruction, compared to the standard technique
title Efficacy of bipolar “button” plasma vaporization of the prostate for benign prostatic obstruction, compared to the standard technique
title_full Efficacy of bipolar “button” plasma vaporization of the prostate for benign prostatic obstruction, compared to the standard technique
title_fullStr Efficacy of bipolar “button” plasma vaporization of the prostate for benign prostatic obstruction, compared to the standard technique
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of bipolar “button” plasma vaporization of the prostate for benign prostatic obstruction, compared to the standard technique
title_short Efficacy of bipolar “button” plasma vaporization of the prostate for benign prostatic obstruction, compared to the standard technique
title_sort efficacy of bipolar “button” plasma vaporization of the prostate for benign prostatic obstruction, compared to the standard technique
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4660693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26692662
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.152019
work_keys_str_mv AT aboutalebhamdy efficacyofbipolarbuttonplasmavaporizationoftheprostateforbenignprostaticobstructioncomparedtothestandardtechnique