Cargando…

Evaluation of recruitment methods for a trial targeting childhood obesity: Families for Health randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Recruitment to trials evaluating the effectiveness of childhood obesity management interventions is challenging. We report our experience of recruitment to the Families for Health study, a randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a family-based community programme for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fleming, J., Kamal, A., Harrison, E., Hamborg, T., Stewart-Brown, S., Thorogood, M., Griffiths, F., Robertson, W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4660776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26607762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-1062-x
_version_ 1782402871291019264
author Fleming, J.
Kamal, A.
Harrison, E.
Hamborg, T.
Stewart-Brown, S.
Thorogood, M.
Griffiths, F.
Robertson, W.
author_facet Fleming, J.
Kamal, A.
Harrison, E.
Hamborg, T.
Stewart-Brown, S.
Thorogood, M.
Griffiths, F.
Robertson, W.
author_sort Fleming, J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recruitment to trials evaluating the effectiveness of childhood obesity management interventions is challenging. We report our experience of recruitment to the Families for Health study, a randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a family-based community programme for children aged 6–11 years, versus usual care. We evaluated the effectiveness of active recruitment (contacting eligible families directly) versus passive recruitment (informing the community through flyers, public events, media). METHODS: Initial approaches included passive recruitment via the media (newspapers and radio) and two active recruitment methods: National Child Measurement Programme (letters to families with overweight children) and referrals from health-care professionals. With slow initial recruitment, further strategies were employed, including active (e.g. targeted letters from general practices) and passive (e.g. flyers, posters and public events) methods. At first enquiry from a potential participant, families were asked where they heard about the study. Further quantitative (questionnaire) and qualitative data (one-to-one interviews with parents/carers), were collected from recruited families at baseline and 3-month follow-up and included questions about recruitment. RESULTS: In total, 194 families enquired about Families for Health, and 115 (59.3 %) were recruited and randomised. Active recruitment yielded 85 enquiries, with 43 families recruited (50.6 %); passive recruitment yielded 99 enquiries with 72 families recruited (72.7 %). Information seen at schools or GP surgeries accounted for over a quarter of enquiries (28.4 %) and over a third (37.4 %) of final recruitment. Eight out of ten families who enquired this way were recruited. Media-led enquiries were low (5 %), but all were recruited. Children of families recruited actively were more likely to be Asian or mixed race. Despite extensive recruitment methods, the trial did not recruit as planned, and was awarded a no-cost extension to complete the 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The higher number of participants recruited through passive methods may be due to the large number of potential participants these methods reached and because participants may see the information more than once. Recruiting to a child obesity treatment study is complex and it is advisable to use multiple recruitment strategies, some aiming at blanket coverage and some targeted at families with children who are overweight. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN45032201 (Date: 18 August 2011) ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-015-1062-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4660776
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46607762015-11-27 Evaluation of recruitment methods for a trial targeting childhood obesity: Families for Health randomised controlled trial Fleming, J. Kamal, A. Harrison, E. Hamborg, T. Stewart-Brown, S. Thorogood, M. Griffiths, F. Robertson, W. Trials Research BACKGROUND: Recruitment to trials evaluating the effectiveness of childhood obesity management interventions is challenging. We report our experience of recruitment to the Families for Health study, a randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a family-based community programme for children aged 6–11 years, versus usual care. We evaluated the effectiveness of active recruitment (contacting eligible families directly) versus passive recruitment (informing the community through flyers, public events, media). METHODS: Initial approaches included passive recruitment via the media (newspapers and radio) and two active recruitment methods: National Child Measurement Programme (letters to families with overweight children) and referrals from health-care professionals. With slow initial recruitment, further strategies were employed, including active (e.g. targeted letters from general practices) and passive (e.g. flyers, posters and public events) methods. At first enquiry from a potential participant, families were asked where they heard about the study. Further quantitative (questionnaire) and qualitative data (one-to-one interviews with parents/carers), were collected from recruited families at baseline and 3-month follow-up and included questions about recruitment. RESULTS: In total, 194 families enquired about Families for Health, and 115 (59.3 %) were recruited and randomised. Active recruitment yielded 85 enquiries, with 43 families recruited (50.6 %); passive recruitment yielded 99 enquiries with 72 families recruited (72.7 %). Information seen at schools or GP surgeries accounted for over a quarter of enquiries (28.4 %) and over a third (37.4 %) of final recruitment. Eight out of ten families who enquired this way were recruited. Media-led enquiries were low (5 %), but all were recruited. Children of families recruited actively were more likely to be Asian or mixed race. Despite extensive recruitment methods, the trial did not recruit as planned, and was awarded a no-cost extension to complete the 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The higher number of participants recruited through passive methods may be due to the large number of potential participants these methods reached and because participants may see the information more than once. Recruiting to a child obesity treatment study is complex and it is advisable to use multiple recruitment strategies, some aiming at blanket coverage and some targeted at families with children who are overweight. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN45032201 (Date: 18 August 2011) ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-015-1062-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4660776/ /pubmed/26607762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-1062-x Text en © Fleming et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Fleming, J.
Kamal, A.
Harrison, E.
Hamborg, T.
Stewart-Brown, S.
Thorogood, M.
Griffiths, F.
Robertson, W.
Evaluation of recruitment methods for a trial targeting childhood obesity: Families for Health randomised controlled trial
title Evaluation of recruitment methods for a trial targeting childhood obesity: Families for Health randomised controlled trial
title_full Evaluation of recruitment methods for a trial targeting childhood obesity: Families for Health randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Evaluation of recruitment methods for a trial targeting childhood obesity: Families for Health randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of recruitment methods for a trial targeting childhood obesity: Families for Health randomised controlled trial
title_short Evaluation of recruitment methods for a trial targeting childhood obesity: Families for Health randomised controlled trial
title_sort evaluation of recruitment methods for a trial targeting childhood obesity: families for health randomised controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4660776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26607762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-1062-x
work_keys_str_mv AT flemingj evaluationofrecruitmentmethodsforatrialtargetingchildhoodobesityfamiliesforhealthrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kamala evaluationofrecruitmentmethodsforatrialtargetingchildhoodobesityfamiliesforhealthrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT harrisone evaluationofrecruitmentmethodsforatrialtargetingchildhoodobesityfamiliesforhealthrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hamborgt evaluationofrecruitmentmethodsforatrialtargetingchildhoodobesityfamiliesforhealthrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT stewartbrowns evaluationofrecruitmentmethodsforatrialtargetingchildhoodobesityfamiliesforhealthrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT thorogoodm evaluationofrecruitmentmethodsforatrialtargetingchildhoodobesityfamiliesforhealthrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT griffithsf evaluationofrecruitmentmethodsforatrialtargetingchildhoodobesityfamiliesforhealthrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT robertsonw evaluationofrecruitmentmethodsforatrialtargetingchildhoodobesityfamiliesforhealthrandomisedcontrolledtrial