Cargando…
DNA Dispose, but Subjects Decide. Learning and the Extended Synthesis
Adaptation by means of natural selection depends on the ability of populations to maintain variation in heritable traits. According to the Modern Synthesis this variation is sustained by mutations and genetic drift. Epigenetics, evodevo, niche construction and cultural factors have more recently bee...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4661179/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26640605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12304-015-9242-3 |
_version_ | 1782402933343649792 |
---|---|
author | Lindholm, Markus |
author_facet | Lindholm, Markus |
author_sort | Lindholm, Markus |
collection | PubMed |
description | Adaptation by means of natural selection depends on the ability of populations to maintain variation in heritable traits. According to the Modern Synthesis this variation is sustained by mutations and genetic drift. Epigenetics, evodevo, niche construction and cultural factors have more recently been shown to contribute to heritable variation, however, leading an increasing number of biologists to call for an extended view of speciation and evolution. An additional common feature across the animal kingdom is learning, defined as the ability to change behavior according to novel experiences or skills. Learning constitutes an additional source for phenotypic variation, and change in behavior may induce long lasting shifts in fitness, and hence favor evolutionary novelties. Based on published studies, I demonstrate how learning about food, mate choice and habitats has contributed substantially to speciation in the canonical story of Darwin’s finches on the Galapagos Islands. Learning cannot be reduced to genetics, because it demands decisions, which requires a subject. Evolutionary novelties may hence emerge both from shifts in allelic frequencies and from shifts in learned, subject driven behavior. The existence of two principally different sources of variation also prevents the Modern Synthesis from self-referring explanations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4661179 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46611792015-12-04 DNA Dispose, but Subjects Decide. Learning and the Extended Synthesis Lindholm, Markus Biosemiotics Review Adaptation by means of natural selection depends on the ability of populations to maintain variation in heritable traits. According to the Modern Synthesis this variation is sustained by mutations and genetic drift. Epigenetics, evodevo, niche construction and cultural factors have more recently been shown to contribute to heritable variation, however, leading an increasing number of biologists to call for an extended view of speciation and evolution. An additional common feature across the animal kingdom is learning, defined as the ability to change behavior according to novel experiences or skills. Learning constitutes an additional source for phenotypic variation, and change in behavior may induce long lasting shifts in fitness, and hence favor evolutionary novelties. Based on published studies, I demonstrate how learning about food, mate choice and habitats has contributed substantially to speciation in the canonical story of Darwin’s finches on the Galapagos Islands. Learning cannot be reduced to genetics, because it demands decisions, which requires a subject. Evolutionary novelties may hence emerge both from shifts in allelic frequencies and from shifts in learned, subject driven behavior. The existence of two principally different sources of variation also prevents the Modern Synthesis from self-referring explanations. Springer Netherlands 2015-05-27 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4661179/ /pubmed/26640605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12304-015-9242-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Lindholm, Markus DNA Dispose, but Subjects Decide. Learning and the Extended Synthesis |
title | DNA Dispose, but Subjects Decide. Learning and the Extended Synthesis |
title_full | DNA Dispose, but Subjects Decide. Learning and the Extended Synthesis |
title_fullStr | DNA Dispose, but Subjects Decide. Learning and the Extended Synthesis |
title_full_unstemmed | DNA Dispose, but Subjects Decide. Learning and the Extended Synthesis |
title_short | DNA Dispose, but Subjects Decide. Learning and the Extended Synthesis |
title_sort | dna dispose, but subjects decide. learning and the extended synthesis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4661179/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26640605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12304-015-9242-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lindholmmarkus dnadisposebutsubjectsdecidelearningandtheextendedsynthesis |