Cargando…

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: an updated review and user survey

Mostrar otras versiones (1)

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Gorst, Sarah L, Gargon, Elizabeth, Williamson, Paula R
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2015
Materias:	Poster Presentation
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4661496/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-16-S3-P8

Ejemplares similares

Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User Survey
por: Gorst, Sarah L., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and Identification of Gaps
por: Gorst, Sarah L., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 5th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 6(th) annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 4th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: An updated systematic review and involvement of low and middle income countries
por: Davis, Katherine, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

The core outcome measures in effectiveness trials (COMET) initiative: five years on
por: Williamson, Paula, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Systematic Review
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

A mixed methods study of researchers’ experiences of developing core outcome sets
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

A survey of core outcome set developers
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Collating the knowledge base for the COMET (core outcome measures in effectiveness trials) initiative - a systematic review
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Inclusion of participants from low-income and middle-income countries in core outcome sets development: a systematic review
por: Karumbi, Jamlick, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Choosing outcomes for a core outcome set: does provision of feedback between delphi survey rounds help prioritise items?
por: Coulman, Karen, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) Initiative
por: Williamson, Paula R, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

COS-STAR: a reporting guideline for studies developing core outcome sets (protocol)
por: Kirkham, Jamie J., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Towards core outcome set (COS) development: a follow-up descriptive survey of outcomes in Cochrane reviews
por: Wuytack, Francesca, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The importance of user controlled research on coercion
por: Russo, Jasna
Publicado: (2007)

The importance of stakeholder selection in core outcome set development: how surveying different health professionals may influence outcome selection
por: Avery, Kerry, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

COMET V meeting summary
por: Gorst, Sarah L, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Evaluation of an automatic article selection method for timelier updates of the Comet Core Outcome Set database
por: Norman, Christopher R, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Can a core outcome set improve the quality of systematic reviews? – a survey of the Co-ordinating Editors of Cochrane review groups
por: Kirkham, Jamie J, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Three nested RCTs of dual or single stakeholder feedback within Delphi surveys during core outcome and information set development
por: Brookes, Sara, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

A review of recruitment of children to randomised clinical trials in the NIHR clinical research network portfolio
por: Kaur, Geetinder, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

The COMET initiative database: progress and activities update (2014)
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Awareness and experiences on core outcome set development and use amongst stakeholders from low- and middle- income countries: An online survey
por: Karumbi, Jamlick, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Are patients and health care professionals influenced by each other's’ opinions about the outcomes to measure in localised prostate cancer effectiveness trials?
por: MacLennan, Steven, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Core Outcome Set–STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement
por: Kirkham, Jamie J., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

The research on female partners of injecting drug users-gender aspect and risk of HIV
por: Grbic, Miljana, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Improving core outcome set development: qualitative interviews with developers provided pointers to inform guidance
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Higher number of items associated with significantly lower response rates in COS Delphi surveys
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Development of an online resource for recruitment research in clinical trials (ORRCA)
por: Harman, Nicola, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Collating the knowledge base for core outcome set development: developing and appraising the search strategy for a systematic review
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Adjusting for informative missing outcome data in clinical trials with longitudinal study designs
por: Kolamunnage-Dona, Ruwanthi, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Which methods to choose to correct cell types in genome-scale blood-derived DNA methylation data?
por: Kaushal, Akhilesh, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Citation analysis: a new approach to assess the uptake of core outcome sets
por: Barnes, Karen, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Including service users in trials and rigorous studies in health and social care: developing a standard operating procedure for researchers
por: Evans, Bridie Angela, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Core outcome set development: the effect of Delphi panel composition and feedback on prioritisation of outcomes
por: Macefield, Rhiannon, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Feasibility of establishing a central repository for the individual participant data from research studies
por: Smith, Catrin Tudur, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

TORCH: Toronto Outcome Research in Child Health - enhancing evidence based outcomes selection in pediatric research
por: Kapadia, Mufiza Z, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Pragmatic approaches to mitigating missing data and research priorities to assess the effectiveness of interventions
por: Kearney, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_q8v2hqrsmkfrh4emqqp76ed194