Cargando…

The fate of chemoresistance in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC)

BACKGROUND: Treatment options for women presenting with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) are limited due to the lack of a therapeutic target and as a result, are managed with standard chemotherapy such as paclitaxel (Taxol®). Following chemotherapy, the ideal tumour response is apoptotic cell de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Reilly, Elma A., Gubbins, Luke, Sharma, Shiva, Tully, Riona, Guang, Matthew Ho Zhing, Weiner-Gorzel, Karolina, McCaffrey, John, Harrison, Michele, Furlong, Fiona, Kell, Malcolm, McCann, Amanda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4661576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26676166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbacli.2015.03.003
_version_ 1782403001396232192
author O’Reilly, Elma A.
Gubbins, Luke
Sharma, Shiva
Tully, Riona
Guang, Matthew Ho Zhing
Weiner-Gorzel, Karolina
McCaffrey, John
Harrison, Michele
Furlong, Fiona
Kell, Malcolm
McCann, Amanda
author_facet O’Reilly, Elma A.
Gubbins, Luke
Sharma, Shiva
Tully, Riona
Guang, Matthew Ho Zhing
Weiner-Gorzel, Karolina
McCaffrey, John
Harrison, Michele
Furlong, Fiona
Kell, Malcolm
McCann, Amanda
author_sort O’Reilly, Elma A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Treatment options for women presenting with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) are limited due to the lack of a therapeutic target and as a result, are managed with standard chemotherapy such as paclitaxel (Taxol®). Following chemotherapy, the ideal tumour response is apoptotic cell death. Post-chemotherapy, cells can maintain viability by undergoing viable cellular responses such as cellular senescence, generating secretomes which can directly enhance the malignant phenotype. SCOPE OF REVIEW: How tumour cells retain viability in response to chemotherapeutic engagement is discussed. In addition we discuss the implications of this retained tumour cell viability in the context of the development of recurrent and metastatic TNBC disease. Current adjuvant and neo-adjuvant treatments available and the novel potential therapies that are being researched are also reviewed. MAJOR CONCLUSIONS: Cellular senescence and cytoprotective autophagy are potential mechanisms of chemoresistance in TNBC. These two non-apoptotic outcomes in response to chemotherapy are inextricably linked and are neglected outcomes of investigation in the chemotherapeutic arena. Cellular fate assessments may therefore have the potential to predict TNBC patient outcome. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: Focusing on the fact that cancer cells can bypass the desired cellular apoptotic response to chemotherapy through cellular senescence and cytoprotective autophagy will highlight the importance of targeting non-apoptotic survival pathways to enhance chemotherapeutic efficacy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4661576
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46615762015-12-15 The fate of chemoresistance in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) O’Reilly, Elma A. Gubbins, Luke Sharma, Shiva Tully, Riona Guang, Matthew Ho Zhing Weiner-Gorzel, Karolina McCaffrey, John Harrison, Michele Furlong, Fiona Kell, Malcolm McCann, Amanda BBA Clin Review BACKGROUND: Treatment options for women presenting with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) are limited due to the lack of a therapeutic target and as a result, are managed with standard chemotherapy such as paclitaxel (Taxol®). Following chemotherapy, the ideal tumour response is apoptotic cell death. Post-chemotherapy, cells can maintain viability by undergoing viable cellular responses such as cellular senescence, generating secretomes which can directly enhance the malignant phenotype. SCOPE OF REVIEW: How tumour cells retain viability in response to chemotherapeutic engagement is discussed. In addition we discuss the implications of this retained tumour cell viability in the context of the development of recurrent and metastatic TNBC disease. Current adjuvant and neo-adjuvant treatments available and the novel potential therapies that are being researched are also reviewed. MAJOR CONCLUSIONS: Cellular senescence and cytoprotective autophagy are potential mechanisms of chemoresistance in TNBC. These two non-apoptotic outcomes in response to chemotherapy are inextricably linked and are neglected outcomes of investigation in the chemotherapeutic arena. Cellular fate assessments may therefore have the potential to predict TNBC patient outcome. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: Focusing on the fact that cancer cells can bypass the desired cellular apoptotic response to chemotherapy through cellular senescence and cytoprotective autophagy will highlight the importance of targeting non-apoptotic survival pathways to enhance chemotherapeutic efficacy. Elsevier 2015-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4661576/ /pubmed/26676166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbacli.2015.03.003 Text en © 2015 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
O’Reilly, Elma A.
Gubbins, Luke
Sharma, Shiva
Tully, Riona
Guang, Matthew Ho Zhing
Weiner-Gorzel, Karolina
McCaffrey, John
Harrison, Michele
Furlong, Fiona
Kell, Malcolm
McCann, Amanda
The fate of chemoresistance in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC)
title The fate of chemoresistance in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC)
title_full The fate of chemoresistance in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC)
title_fullStr The fate of chemoresistance in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC)
title_full_unstemmed The fate of chemoresistance in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC)
title_short The fate of chemoresistance in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC)
title_sort fate of chemoresistance in triple negative breast cancer (tnbc)
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4661576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26676166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbacli.2015.03.003
work_keys_str_mv AT oreillyelmaa thefateofchemoresistanceintriplenegativebreastcancertnbc
AT gubbinsluke thefateofchemoresistanceintriplenegativebreastcancertnbc
AT sharmashiva thefateofchemoresistanceintriplenegativebreastcancertnbc
AT tullyriona thefateofchemoresistanceintriplenegativebreastcancertnbc
AT guangmatthewhozhing thefateofchemoresistanceintriplenegativebreastcancertnbc
AT weinergorzelkarolina thefateofchemoresistanceintriplenegativebreastcancertnbc
AT mccaffreyjohn thefateofchemoresistanceintriplenegativebreastcancertnbc
AT harrisonmichele thefateofchemoresistanceintriplenegativebreastcancertnbc
AT furlongfiona thefateofchemoresistanceintriplenegativebreastcancertnbc
AT kellmalcolm thefateofchemoresistanceintriplenegativebreastcancertnbc
AT mccannamanda thefateofchemoresistanceintriplenegativebreastcancertnbc
AT oreillyelmaa fateofchemoresistanceintriplenegativebreastcancertnbc
AT gubbinsluke fateofchemoresistanceintriplenegativebreastcancertnbc
AT sharmashiva fateofchemoresistanceintriplenegativebreastcancertnbc
AT tullyriona fateofchemoresistanceintriplenegativebreastcancertnbc
AT guangmatthewhozhing fateofchemoresistanceintriplenegativebreastcancertnbc
AT weinergorzelkarolina fateofchemoresistanceintriplenegativebreastcancertnbc
AT mccaffreyjohn fateofchemoresistanceintriplenegativebreastcancertnbc
AT harrisonmichele fateofchemoresistanceintriplenegativebreastcancertnbc
AT furlongfiona fateofchemoresistanceintriplenegativebreastcancertnbc
AT kellmalcolm fateofchemoresistanceintriplenegativebreastcancertnbc
AT mccannamanda fateofchemoresistanceintriplenegativebreastcancertnbc