Cargando…

Lactic Acid Fermentation, Urea and Lime Addition: Promising Faecal Sludge Sanitizing Methods for Emergency Sanitation

In this research, three faecal sludge sanitizing methods—lactic acid fermentation, urea treatment and lime treatment—were studied for application in emergency situations. These methods were investigated by undertaking small scale field trials with pit latrine sludge in Blantyre, Malawi. Hydrated lim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anderson, Catherine, Malambo, Dennis Hanjalika, Gonzalez Perez, Maria Eliette, Nobela, Happiness Ngwanamoseka, de Pooter, Lobke, Spit, Jan, Hooijmans, Christine Maria, van de Vossenberg, Jack, Greya, Wilson, Thole, Bernard, van Lier, Jules B., Brdjanovic, Damir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4661620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26528995
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph121113871
_version_ 1782403011156377600
author Anderson, Catherine
Malambo, Dennis Hanjalika
Gonzalez Perez, Maria Eliette
Nobela, Happiness Ngwanamoseka
de Pooter, Lobke
Spit, Jan
Hooijmans, Christine Maria
van de Vossenberg, Jack
Greya, Wilson
Thole, Bernard
van Lier, Jules B.
Brdjanovic, Damir
author_facet Anderson, Catherine
Malambo, Dennis Hanjalika
Gonzalez Perez, Maria Eliette
Nobela, Happiness Ngwanamoseka
de Pooter, Lobke
Spit, Jan
Hooijmans, Christine Maria
van de Vossenberg, Jack
Greya, Wilson
Thole, Bernard
van Lier, Jules B.
Brdjanovic, Damir
author_sort Anderson, Catherine
collection PubMed
description In this research, three faecal sludge sanitizing methods—lactic acid fermentation, urea treatment and lime treatment—were studied for application in emergency situations. These methods were investigated by undertaking small scale field trials with pit latrine sludge in Blantyre, Malawi. Hydrated lime was able to reduce the E. coli count in the sludge to below the detectable limit within 1 h applying a pH > 11 (using a dosage from 7% to 17% w/w, depending faecal sludge alkalinity), urea treatment required about 4 days using 2.5% wet weight urea addition, and lactic acid fermentation needed approximately 1 week after being dosed with 10% wet weight molasses (2 g (glucose/fructose)/kg) and 10% wet weight pre-culture (99.8% pasteurised whole milk and 0.02% fermented milk drink containing Lactobacillus casei Shirota). Based on Malawian prices, the cost of sanitizing 1 m(3) of faecal sludge was estimated to be €32 for lactic acid fermentation, €20 for urea treatment and €12 for hydrated lime treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4661620
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46616202015-12-10 Lactic Acid Fermentation, Urea and Lime Addition: Promising Faecal Sludge Sanitizing Methods for Emergency Sanitation Anderson, Catherine Malambo, Dennis Hanjalika Gonzalez Perez, Maria Eliette Nobela, Happiness Ngwanamoseka de Pooter, Lobke Spit, Jan Hooijmans, Christine Maria van de Vossenberg, Jack Greya, Wilson Thole, Bernard van Lier, Jules B. Brdjanovic, Damir Int J Environ Res Public Health Article In this research, three faecal sludge sanitizing methods—lactic acid fermentation, urea treatment and lime treatment—were studied for application in emergency situations. These methods were investigated by undertaking small scale field trials with pit latrine sludge in Blantyre, Malawi. Hydrated lime was able to reduce the E. coli count in the sludge to below the detectable limit within 1 h applying a pH > 11 (using a dosage from 7% to 17% w/w, depending faecal sludge alkalinity), urea treatment required about 4 days using 2.5% wet weight urea addition, and lactic acid fermentation needed approximately 1 week after being dosed with 10% wet weight molasses (2 g (glucose/fructose)/kg) and 10% wet weight pre-culture (99.8% pasteurised whole milk and 0.02% fermented milk drink containing Lactobacillus casei Shirota). Based on Malawian prices, the cost of sanitizing 1 m(3) of faecal sludge was estimated to be €32 for lactic acid fermentation, €20 for urea treatment and €12 for hydrated lime treatment. MDPI 2015-10-29 2015-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4661620/ /pubmed/26528995 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph121113871 Text en © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Anderson, Catherine
Malambo, Dennis Hanjalika
Gonzalez Perez, Maria Eliette
Nobela, Happiness Ngwanamoseka
de Pooter, Lobke
Spit, Jan
Hooijmans, Christine Maria
van de Vossenberg, Jack
Greya, Wilson
Thole, Bernard
van Lier, Jules B.
Brdjanovic, Damir
Lactic Acid Fermentation, Urea and Lime Addition: Promising Faecal Sludge Sanitizing Methods for Emergency Sanitation
title Lactic Acid Fermentation, Urea and Lime Addition: Promising Faecal Sludge Sanitizing Methods for Emergency Sanitation
title_full Lactic Acid Fermentation, Urea and Lime Addition: Promising Faecal Sludge Sanitizing Methods for Emergency Sanitation
title_fullStr Lactic Acid Fermentation, Urea and Lime Addition: Promising Faecal Sludge Sanitizing Methods for Emergency Sanitation
title_full_unstemmed Lactic Acid Fermentation, Urea and Lime Addition: Promising Faecal Sludge Sanitizing Methods for Emergency Sanitation
title_short Lactic Acid Fermentation, Urea and Lime Addition: Promising Faecal Sludge Sanitizing Methods for Emergency Sanitation
title_sort lactic acid fermentation, urea and lime addition: promising faecal sludge sanitizing methods for emergency sanitation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4661620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26528995
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph121113871
work_keys_str_mv AT andersoncatherine lacticacidfermentationureaandlimeadditionpromisingfaecalsludgesanitizingmethodsforemergencysanitation
AT malambodennishanjalika lacticacidfermentationureaandlimeadditionpromisingfaecalsludgesanitizingmethodsforemergencysanitation
AT gonzalezperezmariaeliette lacticacidfermentationureaandlimeadditionpromisingfaecalsludgesanitizingmethodsforemergencysanitation
AT nobelahappinessngwanamoseka lacticacidfermentationureaandlimeadditionpromisingfaecalsludgesanitizingmethodsforemergencysanitation
AT depooterlobke lacticacidfermentationureaandlimeadditionpromisingfaecalsludgesanitizingmethodsforemergencysanitation
AT spitjan lacticacidfermentationureaandlimeadditionpromisingfaecalsludgesanitizingmethodsforemergencysanitation
AT hooijmanschristinemaria lacticacidfermentationureaandlimeadditionpromisingfaecalsludgesanitizingmethodsforemergencysanitation
AT vandevossenbergjack lacticacidfermentationureaandlimeadditionpromisingfaecalsludgesanitizingmethodsforemergencysanitation
AT greyawilson lacticacidfermentationureaandlimeadditionpromisingfaecalsludgesanitizingmethodsforemergencysanitation
AT tholebernard lacticacidfermentationureaandlimeadditionpromisingfaecalsludgesanitizingmethodsforemergencysanitation
AT vanlierjulesb lacticacidfermentationureaandlimeadditionpromisingfaecalsludgesanitizingmethodsforemergencysanitation
AT brdjanovicdamir lacticacidfermentationureaandlimeadditionpromisingfaecalsludgesanitizingmethodsforemergencysanitation