Cargando…

Indoor Environmental Quality in Mechanically Ventilated, Energy-Efficient Buildings vs. Conventional Buildings

Energy-efficient buildings need mechanical ventilation. However, there are concerns that inadequate mechanical ventilation may lead to impaired indoor air quality. Using a semi-experimental field study, we investigated if exposure of occupants of two types of buildings (mechanical vs. natural ventil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wallner, Peter, Munoz, Ute, Tappler, Peter, Wanka, Anna, Kundi, Michael, Shelton, Janie F., Hutter, Hans-Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4661637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26561823
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph121114132
_version_ 1782403015058128896
author Wallner, Peter
Munoz, Ute
Tappler, Peter
Wanka, Anna
Kundi, Michael
Shelton, Janie F.
Hutter, Hans-Peter
author_facet Wallner, Peter
Munoz, Ute
Tappler, Peter
Wanka, Anna
Kundi, Michael
Shelton, Janie F.
Hutter, Hans-Peter
author_sort Wallner, Peter
collection PubMed
description Energy-efficient buildings need mechanical ventilation. However, there are concerns that inadequate mechanical ventilation may lead to impaired indoor air quality. Using a semi-experimental field study, we investigated if exposure of occupants of two types of buildings (mechanical vs. natural ventilation) differs with regard to indoor air pollutants and climate factors. We investigated living and bedrooms in 123 buildings (62 highly energy-efficient and 61 conventional buildings) built in the years 2010 to 2012 in Austria (mainly Vienna and Lower Austria). Measurements of indoor parameters (climate, chemical pollutants and biological contaminants) were conducted twice. In total, more than 3000 measurements were performed. Almost all indoor air quality and room climate parameters showed significantly better results in mechanically ventilated homes compared to those relying on ventilation from open windows and/or doors. This study does not support the hypothesis that occupants in mechanically ventilated low energy houses are exposed to lower indoor air quality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4661637
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46616372015-12-10 Indoor Environmental Quality in Mechanically Ventilated, Energy-Efficient Buildings vs. Conventional Buildings Wallner, Peter Munoz, Ute Tappler, Peter Wanka, Anna Kundi, Michael Shelton, Janie F. Hutter, Hans-Peter Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Energy-efficient buildings need mechanical ventilation. However, there are concerns that inadequate mechanical ventilation may lead to impaired indoor air quality. Using a semi-experimental field study, we investigated if exposure of occupants of two types of buildings (mechanical vs. natural ventilation) differs with regard to indoor air pollutants and climate factors. We investigated living and bedrooms in 123 buildings (62 highly energy-efficient and 61 conventional buildings) built in the years 2010 to 2012 in Austria (mainly Vienna and Lower Austria). Measurements of indoor parameters (climate, chemical pollutants and biological contaminants) were conducted twice. In total, more than 3000 measurements were performed. Almost all indoor air quality and room climate parameters showed significantly better results in mechanically ventilated homes compared to those relying on ventilation from open windows and/or doors. This study does not support the hypothesis that occupants in mechanically ventilated low energy houses are exposed to lower indoor air quality. MDPI 2015-11-06 2015-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4661637/ /pubmed/26561823 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph121114132 Text en © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wallner, Peter
Munoz, Ute
Tappler, Peter
Wanka, Anna
Kundi, Michael
Shelton, Janie F.
Hutter, Hans-Peter
Indoor Environmental Quality in Mechanically Ventilated, Energy-Efficient Buildings vs. Conventional Buildings
title Indoor Environmental Quality in Mechanically Ventilated, Energy-Efficient Buildings vs. Conventional Buildings
title_full Indoor Environmental Quality in Mechanically Ventilated, Energy-Efficient Buildings vs. Conventional Buildings
title_fullStr Indoor Environmental Quality in Mechanically Ventilated, Energy-Efficient Buildings vs. Conventional Buildings
title_full_unstemmed Indoor Environmental Quality in Mechanically Ventilated, Energy-Efficient Buildings vs. Conventional Buildings
title_short Indoor Environmental Quality in Mechanically Ventilated, Energy-Efficient Buildings vs. Conventional Buildings
title_sort indoor environmental quality in mechanically ventilated, energy-efficient buildings vs. conventional buildings
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4661637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26561823
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph121114132
work_keys_str_mv AT wallnerpeter indoorenvironmentalqualityinmechanicallyventilatedenergyefficientbuildingsvsconventionalbuildings
AT munozute indoorenvironmentalqualityinmechanicallyventilatedenergyefficientbuildingsvsconventionalbuildings
AT tapplerpeter indoorenvironmentalqualityinmechanicallyventilatedenergyefficientbuildingsvsconventionalbuildings
AT wankaanna indoorenvironmentalqualityinmechanicallyventilatedenergyefficientbuildingsvsconventionalbuildings
AT kundimichael indoorenvironmentalqualityinmechanicallyventilatedenergyefficientbuildingsvsconventionalbuildings
AT sheltonjanief indoorenvironmentalqualityinmechanicallyventilatedenergyefficientbuildingsvsconventionalbuildings
AT hutterhanspeter indoorenvironmentalqualityinmechanicallyventilatedenergyefficientbuildingsvsconventionalbuildings