Cargando…

Winners always win: growth of a wide range of plant species from low to future high CO (2)

Evolutionary adaptation to variation in resource supply has resulted in plant strategies that are based on trade‐offs in functional traits. Here, we investigate, for the first time across multiple species, whether such trade‐offs are also apparent in growth and morphology responses to past low, curr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Temme, Andries A., Liu, Jin Chun, Cornwell, William K., Cornelissen, Johannes H. C., Aerts, Rien
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4662314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26640673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1687
Descripción
Sumario:Evolutionary adaptation to variation in resource supply has resulted in plant strategies that are based on trade‐offs in functional traits. Here, we investigate, for the first time across multiple species, whether such trade‐offs are also apparent in growth and morphology responses to past low, current ambient, and future high CO (2) concentrations. We grew freshly germinated seedlings of up to 28 C(3) species (16 forbs, 6 woody, and 6 grasses) in climate chambers at 160 ppm, 450 ppm, and 750 ppm CO (2). We determined biomass, allocation, SLA (specific leaf area), LAR (leaf area ratio), and RGR (relative growth rate), thereby doubling the available data on these plant responses to low CO (2). High CO (2) increased RGR by 8%; low CO (2) decreased RGR by 23%. Fast growers at ambient CO (2) had the greatest reduction in RGR at low CO (2) as they lost the benefits of a fast‐growth morphology (decoupling of RGR and LAR [leaf area ratio]). Despite these shifts species ranking on biomass and RGR was unaffected by CO (2), winners continued to win, regardless of CO (2.) Unlike for other plant resources we found no trade‐offs in morphological and growth responses to CO (2) variation, changes in morphological traits were unrelated to changes in growth at low or high CO (2). Thus, changes in physiology may be more important than morphological changes in response to CO (2) variation.