Cargando…

Is a community still a community? Reviewing definitions of key terms in community ecology

Community ecology is an inherently complicated field, confounded by the conflicting use of fundamental terms. Nearly two decades ago, Fauth et al. (1996) demonstrated that imprecise language led to the virtual synonymy of important terms and so attempted to clearly define four keywords in community...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stroud, James T., Bush, Michael R., Ladd, Mark C., Nowicki, Robert J., Shantz, Andrew A., Sweatman, Jennifer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4662321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26640657
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1651
_version_ 1782403143230816256
author Stroud, James T.
Bush, Michael R.
Ladd, Mark C.
Nowicki, Robert J.
Shantz, Andrew A.
Sweatman, Jennifer
author_facet Stroud, James T.
Bush, Michael R.
Ladd, Mark C.
Nowicki, Robert J.
Shantz, Andrew A.
Sweatman, Jennifer
author_sort Stroud, James T.
collection PubMed
description Community ecology is an inherently complicated field, confounded by the conflicting use of fundamental terms. Nearly two decades ago, Fauth et al. (1996) demonstrated that imprecise language led to the virtual synonymy of important terms and so attempted to clearly define four keywords in community ecology; “community,” “assemblage,” “guild,” and “ensemble”. We revisit Fauth et al.'s conclusion and discuss how the use of these terms has changed over time since their review. An updated analysis of term definition from a selection of popular ecological textbooks suggests that definitions have drifted away from those encountered pre‐1996, and slightly disagreed with results from a survey of 100 ecology professionals (comprising of academic professors, nonacademic PhDs, graduate and undergraduate biology students). Results suggest that confusion about these terms is still widespread in ecology. We conclude with clear suggestions for definitions of each term to be adopted hereafter to provide greater cohesion among research groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4662321
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46623212015-12-04 Is a community still a community? Reviewing definitions of key terms in community ecology Stroud, James T. Bush, Michael R. Ladd, Mark C. Nowicki, Robert J. Shantz, Andrew A. Sweatman, Jennifer Ecol Evol Review Community ecology is an inherently complicated field, confounded by the conflicting use of fundamental terms. Nearly two decades ago, Fauth et al. (1996) demonstrated that imprecise language led to the virtual synonymy of important terms and so attempted to clearly define four keywords in community ecology; “community,” “assemblage,” “guild,” and “ensemble”. We revisit Fauth et al.'s conclusion and discuss how the use of these terms has changed over time since their review. An updated analysis of term definition from a selection of popular ecological textbooks suggests that definitions have drifted away from those encountered pre‐1996, and slightly disagreed with results from a survey of 100 ecology professionals (comprising of academic professors, nonacademic PhDs, graduate and undergraduate biology students). Results suggest that confusion about these terms is still widespread in ecology. We conclude with clear suggestions for definitions of each term to be adopted hereafter to provide greater cohesion among research groups. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4662321/ /pubmed/26640657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1651 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Stroud, James T.
Bush, Michael R.
Ladd, Mark C.
Nowicki, Robert J.
Shantz, Andrew A.
Sweatman, Jennifer
Is a community still a community? Reviewing definitions of key terms in community ecology
title Is a community still a community? Reviewing definitions of key terms in community ecology
title_full Is a community still a community? Reviewing definitions of key terms in community ecology
title_fullStr Is a community still a community? Reviewing definitions of key terms in community ecology
title_full_unstemmed Is a community still a community? Reviewing definitions of key terms in community ecology
title_short Is a community still a community? Reviewing definitions of key terms in community ecology
title_sort is a community still a community? reviewing definitions of key terms in community ecology
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4662321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26640657
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1651
work_keys_str_mv AT stroudjamest isacommunitystillacommunityreviewingdefinitionsofkeytermsincommunityecology
AT bushmichaelr isacommunitystillacommunityreviewingdefinitionsofkeytermsincommunityecology
AT laddmarkc isacommunitystillacommunityreviewingdefinitionsofkeytermsincommunityecology
AT nowickirobertj isacommunitystillacommunityreviewingdefinitionsofkeytermsincommunityecology
AT shantzandrewa isacommunitystillacommunityreviewingdefinitionsofkeytermsincommunityecology
AT sweatmanjennifer isacommunitystillacommunityreviewingdefinitionsofkeytermsincommunityecology