Cargando…
Is a community still a community? Reviewing definitions of key terms in community ecology
Community ecology is an inherently complicated field, confounded by the conflicting use of fundamental terms. Nearly two decades ago, Fauth et al. (1996) demonstrated that imprecise language led to the virtual synonymy of important terms and so attempted to clearly define four keywords in community...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4662321/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26640657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1651 |
_version_ | 1782403143230816256 |
---|---|
author | Stroud, James T. Bush, Michael R. Ladd, Mark C. Nowicki, Robert J. Shantz, Andrew A. Sweatman, Jennifer |
author_facet | Stroud, James T. Bush, Michael R. Ladd, Mark C. Nowicki, Robert J. Shantz, Andrew A. Sweatman, Jennifer |
author_sort | Stroud, James T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Community ecology is an inherently complicated field, confounded by the conflicting use of fundamental terms. Nearly two decades ago, Fauth et al. (1996) demonstrated that imprecise language led to the virtual synonymy of important terms and so attempted to clearly define four keywords in community ecology; “community,” “assemblage,” “guild,” and “ensemble”. We revisit Fauth et al.'s conclusion and discuss how the use of these terms has changed over time since their review. An updated analysis of term definition from a selection of popular ecological textbooks suggests that definitions have drifted away from those encountered pre‐1996, and slightly disagreed with results from a survey of 100 ecology professionals (comprising of academic professors, nonacademic PhDs, graduate and undergraduate biology students). Results suggest that confusion about these terms is still widespread in ecology. We conclude with clear suggestions for definitions of each term to be adopted hereafter to provide greater cohesion among research groups. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4662321 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46623212015-12-04 Is a community still a community? Reviewing definitions of key terms in community ecology Stroud, James T. Bush, Michael R. Ladd, Mark C. Nowicki, Robert J. Shantz, Andrew A. Sweatman, Jennifer Ecol Evol Review Community ecology is an inherently complicated field, confounded by the conflicting use of fundamental terms. Nearly two decades ago, Fauth et al. (1996) demonstrated that imprecise language led to the virtual synonymy of important terms and so attempted to clearly define four keywords in community ecology; “community,” “assemblage,” “guild,” and “ensemble”. We revisit Fauth et al.'s conclusion and discuss how the use of these terms has changed over time since their review. An updated analysis of term definition from a selection of popular ecological textbooks suggests that definitions have drifted away from those encountered pre‐1996, and slightly disagreed with results from a survey of 100 ecology professionals (comprising of academic professors, nonacademic PhDs, graduate and undergraduate biology students). Results suggest that confusion about these terms is still widespread in ecology. We conclude with clear suggestions for definitions of each term to be adopted hereafter to provide greater cohesion among research groups. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4662321/ /pubmed/26640657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1651 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Stroud, James T. Bush, Michael R. Ladd, Mark C. Nowicki, Robert J. Shantz, Andrew A. Sweatman, Jennifer Is a community still a community? Reviewing definitions of key terms in community ecology |
title | Is a community still a community? Reviewing definitions of key terms in community ecology |
title_full | Is a community still a community? Reviewing definitions of key terms in community ecology |
title_fullStr | Is a community still a community? Reviewing definitions of key terms in community ecology |
title_full_unstemmed | Is a community still a community? Reviewing definitions of key terms in community ecology |
title_short | Is a community still a community? Reviewing definitions of key terms in community ecology |
title_sort | is a community still a community? reviewing definitions of key terms in community ecology |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4662321/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26640657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1651 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stroudjamest isacommunitystillacommunityreviewingdefinitionsofkeytermsincommunityecology AT bushmichaelr isacommunitystillacommunityreviewingdefinitionsofkeytermsincommunityecology AT laddmarkc isacommunitystillacommunityreviewingdefinitionsofkeytermsincommunityecology AT nowickirobertj isacommunitystillacommunityreviewingdefinitionsofkeytermsincommunityecology AT shantzandrewa isacommunitystillacommunityreviewingdefinitionsofkeytermsincommunityecology AT sweatmanjennifer isacommunitystillacommunityreviewingdefinitionsofkeytermsincommunityecology |