Cargando…
Significance of the disc damage likelihood scale objectively measured by a non-mydriatic fundus camera in preperimetric glaucoma
PURPOSE: To assess the correlation between the disc damage likelihood scale (DDLS) objectively measured by a non-mydriatic fundus camera, Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3, and optic coherence tomography in preperimetric glaucoma. METHODS: One-hundred-twenty-five patients with preperimetric primary open...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4662372/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26640365 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S93213 |
_version_ | 1782403153895882752 |
---|---|
author | Pahlitzsch, Milena Torun, Necip Erb, Carl Bruenner, Jeanette Maier, Anna Karina B Gonnermann, Johannes Bertelmann, Eckart Klamann, Matthias K J |
author_facet | Pahlitzsch, Milena Torun, Necip Erb, Carl Bruenner, Jeanette Maier, Anna Karina B Gonnermann, Johannes Bertelmann, Eckart Klamann, Matthias K J |
author_sort | Pahlitzsch, Milena |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To assess the correlation between the disc damage likelihood scale (DDLS) objectively measured by a non-mydriatic fundus camera, Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3, and optic coherence tomography in preperimetric glaucoma. METHODS: One-hundred-twenty-five patients with preperimetric primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (n=30) were included (mean age 58.9±15.9 years). All three devices graded the optic disc topography: Diagnosis 1 was defined as “outside normal limits”, while Diagnosis 2 as “borderline or outside normal limits”. RESULTS: For Diagnosis 1, a significant correlation was shown between DDLS and Moorfields regression analysis (P=0.022), and for Diagnosis 2 with glaucoma probability score analysis (P=0.024), in POAG. In pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, DDLS did not correlate significantly with Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 and optic coherence tomography. Regarding the area under the curve the highest predictive power was demonstrated by the objective DDLS (0.513–0.824) compared to Burk (0.239–0.343) and Mikelberg (0.093–0.270) coefficients. CONCLUSIONS: The DDLS showed a significant correlation to the Moorfields regression analysis in preperimetric POAG. The objective DDLS showed the highest predictive power and thus is an additive tool in diagnosing preperimetric glaucoma. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4662372 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46623722015-12-04 Significance of the disc damage likelihood scale objectively measured by a non-mydriatic fundus camera in preperimetric glaucoma Pahlitzsch, Milena Torun, Necip Erb, Carl Bruenner, Jeanette Maier, Anna Karina B Gonnermann, Johannes Bertelmann, Eckart Klamann, Matthias K J Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To assess the correlation between the disc damage likelihood scale (DDLS) objectively measured by a non-mydriatic fundus camera, Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3, and optic coherence tomography in preperimetric glaucoma. METHODS: One-hundred-twenty-five patients with preperimetric primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (n=30) were included (mean age 58.9±15.9 years). All three devices graded the optic disc topography: Diagnosis 1 was defined as “outside normal limits”, while Diagnosis 2 as “borderline or outside normal limits”. RESULTS: For Diagnosis 1, a significant correlation was shown between DDLS and Moorfields regression analysis (P=0.022), and for Diagnosis 2 with glaucoma probability score analysis (P=0.024), in POAG. In pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, DDLS did not correlate significantly with Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 and optic coherence tomography. Regarding the area under the curve the highest predictive power was demonstrated by the objective DDLS (0.513–0.824) compared to Burk (0.239–0.343) and Mikelberg (0.093–0.270) coefficients. CONCLUSIONS: The DDLS showed a significant correlation to the Moorfields regression analysis in preperimetric POAG. The objective DDLS showed the highest predictive power and thus is an additive tool in diagnosing preperimetric glaucoma. Dove Medical Press 2015-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4662372/ /pubmed/26640365 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S93213 Text en © 2015 Pahlitzsch et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Pahlitzsch, Milena Torun, Necip Erb, Carl Bruenner, Jeanette Maier, Anna Karina B Gonnermann, Johannes Bertelmann, Eckart Klamann, Matthias K J Significance of the disc damage likelihood scale objectively measured by a non-mydriatic fundus camera in preperimetric glaucoma |
title | Significance of the disc damage likelihood scale objectively measured by a non-mydriatic fundus camera in preperimetric glaucoma |
title_full | Significance of the disc damage likelihood scale objectively measured by a non-mydriatic fundus camera in preperimetric glaucoma |
title_fullStr | Significance of the disc damage likelihood scale objectively measured by a non-mydriatic fundus camera in preperimetric glaucoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Significance of the disc damage likelihood scale objectively measured by a non-mydriatic fundus camera in preperimetric glaucoma |
title_short | Significance of the disc damage likelihood scale objectively measured by a non-mydriatic fundus camera in preperimetric glaucoma |
title_sort | significance of the disc damage likelihood scale objectively measured by a non-mydriatic fundus camera in preperimetric glaucoma |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4662372/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26640365 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S93213 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pahlitzschmilena significanceofthediscdamagelikelihoodscaleobjectivelymeasuredbyanonmydriaticfunduscamerainpreperimetricglaucoma AT torunnecip significanceofthediscdamagelikelihoodscaleobjectivelymeasuredbyanonmydriaticfunduscamerainpreperimetricglaucoma AT erbcarl significanceofthediscdamagelikelihoodscaleobjectivelymeasuredbyanonmydriaticfunduscamerainpreperimetricglaucoma AT bruennerjeanette significanceofthediscdamagelikelihoodscaleobjectivelymeasuredbyanonmydriaticfunduscamerainpreperimetricglaucoma AT maierannakarinab significanceofthediscdamagelikelihoodscaleobjectivelymeasuredbyanonmydriaticfunduscamerainpreperimetricglaucoma AT gonnermannjohannes significanceofthediscdamagelikelihoodscaleobjectivelymeasuredbyanonmydriaticfunduscamerainpreperimetricglaucoma AT bertelmanneckart significanceofthediscdamagelikelihoodscaleobjectivelymeasuredbyanonmydriaticfunduscamerainpreperimetricglaucoma AT klamannmatthiaskj significanceofthediscdamagelikelihoodscaleobjectivelymeasuredbyanonmydriaticfunduscamerainpreperimetricglaucoma |