Cargando…
Measuring health disparities: a comparison of absolute and relative disparities
Monitoring national trends in disparities in different diseases could provide measures to evaluate the impact of intervention programs designed to reduce health disparities. In the US, most of the reports that track health disparities provided either relative or absolute disparities or both. However...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4662578/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26623191 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1438 |
_version_ | 1782403178942169088 |
---|---|
author | Moonesinghe, Ramal Beckles, Gloria L.A. |
author_facet | Moonesinghe, Ramal Beckles, Gloria L.A. |
author_sort | Moonesinghe, Ramal |
collection | PubMed |
description | Monitoring national trends in disparities in different diseases could provide measures to evaluate the impact of intervention programs designed to reduce health disparities. In the US, most of the reports that track health disparities provided either relative or absolute disparities or both. However, these two measures of disparities are not only different in scale and magnitude but also the temporal changes in the magnitudes of these measures can occur in opposite directions. The trends for absolute disparity and relative disparity could move in opposite directions when the prevalence of disease in the two populations being compared either increase or decline simultaneously. If the absolute disparity increases but relative disparity declines for consecutive time periods, the absolute disparity increases but relative disparity declines for the combined time periods even with a larger increase in absolute disparity during the combined time periods. Based on random increases or decreases in prevalence of disease for two population groups, there is a higher chance the trends of these two measures could move in opposite directions when the prevalence of disease for the more advantaged group is very small relative to the prevalence of disease for the more disadvantaged group. When prevalence of disease increase or decrease simultaneously for two populations, the increase or decrease in absolute disparity has to be sufficiently large enough to warrant a corresponding increase or decrease in relative disparity. When absolute disparity declines but relative disparity increases, there is some progress in reducing disparities, but the reduction in absolute disparity is not large enough to also reduce relative disparity. When evaluating interventions to reduce health disparities using these two measures, it is important to consider both absolute and relative disparities and consider all the scenarios discussed in this paper to assess the progress towards reducing or eliminating health disparities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4662578 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46625782015-11-30 Measuring health disparities: a comparison of absolute and relative disparities Moonesinghe, Ramal Beckles, Gloria L.A. PeerJ Epidemiology Monitoring national trends in disparities in different diseases could provide measures to evaluate the impact of intervention programs designed to reduce health disparities. In the US, most of the reports that track health disparities provided either relative or absolute disparities or both. However, these two measures of disparities are not only different in scale and magnitude but also the temporal changes in the magnitudes of these measures can occur in opposite directions. The trends for absolute disparity and relative disparity could move in opposite directions when the prevalence of disease in the two populations being compared either increase or decline simultaneously. If the absolute disparity increases but relative disparity declines for consecutive time periods, the absolute disparity increases but relative disparity declines for the combined time periods even with a larger increase in absolute disparity during the combined time periods. Based on random increases or decreases in prevalence of disease for two population groups, there is a higher chance the trends of these two measures could move in opposite directions when the prevalence of disease for the more advantaged group is very small relative to the prevalence of disease for the more disadvantaged group. When prevalence of disease increase or decrease simultaneously for two populations, the increase or decrease in absolute disparity has to be sufficiently large enough to warrant a corresponding increase or decrease in relative disparity. When absolute disparity declines but relative disparity increases, there is some progress in reducing disparities, but the reduction in absolute disparity is not large enough to also reduce relative disparity. When evaluating interventions to reduce health disparities using these two measures, it is important to consider both absolute and relative disparities and consider all the scenarios discussed in this paper to assess the progress towards reducing or eliminating health disparities. PeerJ Inc. 2015-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4662578/ /pubmed/26623191 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1438 Text en © 2015 Moonesinghe and Beckles http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Epidemiology Moonesinghe, Ramal Beckles, Gloria L.A. Measuring health disparities: a comparison of absolute and relative disparities |
title | Measuring health disparities: a comparison of absolute and relative disparities |
title_full | Measuring health disparities: a comparison of absolute and relative disparities |
title_fullStr | Measuring health disparities: a comparison of absolute and relative disparities |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring health disparities: a comparison of absolute and relative disparities |
title_short | Measuring health disparities: a comparison of absolute and relative disparities |
title_sort | measuring health disparities: a comparison of absolute and relative disparities |
topic | Epidemiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4662578/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26623191 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1438 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moonesingheramal measuringhealthdisparitiesacomparisonofabsoluteandrelativedisparities AT becklesgloriala measuringhealthdisparitiesacomparisonofabsoluteandrelativedisparities |