Cargando…

Fixed versus Flexible Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Antagonist Protocol in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for Invitro Fertilization in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

Objective: This study was conducted to compare the results of fixed versus flexible GnRH antagonist protocols in controlled ovarian stimulation for Intra Cytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) in patients with PCOS. Materials and methods: A randomized clinical trial was performed on 100 PCOS women, who...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hossein Rashidi, Batool, Behrouzi Lak, Tahereh, ShahrokhTehrani, Ensiyeh, Davari Tanha, Fatemeh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4662759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26622314
_version_ 1782403200676003840
author Hossein Rashidi, Batool
Behrouzi Lak, Tahereh
ShahrokhTehrani, Ensiyeh
Davari Tanha, Fatemeh
author_facet Hossein Rashidi, Batool
Behrouzi Lak, Tahereh
ShahrokhTehrani, Ensiyeh
Davari Tanha, Fatemeh
author_sort Hossein Rashidi, Batool
collection PubMed
description Objective: This study was conducted to compare the results of fixed versus flexible GnRH antagonist protocols in controlled ovarian stimulation for Intra Cytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) in patients with PCOS. Materials and methods: A randomized clinical trial was performed on 100 PCOS women, who were admitted to a tertiary infertility clinic and were candidate for IVF/ICSI. They were divided into two groups based on the GnRH antagonist protocol. We started GnRH antagonist 0.25mg in flexible protocol when a follicle ≥ 14 mm in diameter was seen in transvaginalsonography (Group 1). In fixed protocol, GnRH antagonist was administered from day 6 of stimulation (Group 2). Number of oocytes in methapase 2, number of developed and frozen embryo as main outcome and days of stimulation, number of gonadotropin and antagonist used assecondry outcome measures were assessed and compared between the two groups. Results: The days of stimulation and the number of antagonist used was not significantly different between fixed and flexible group (p ≥ 0.05).Although the number of gonadotropin injections was significantly lower in flexible group (p = 0.03), the number of oocyte retrieved and the number of embryo which cryopreserved was significantly higher in flexible compared to fixed protocol (p < 0.01). Conclusion: It seems using flexible antagonist protocol in PCOS infertile patients is in favor of better outcomes in terms of number of good quality oocytes and embryo and possibility for cryopreservation for future cycles.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4662759
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46627592015-11-30 Fixed versus Flexible Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Antagonist Protocol in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for Invitro Fertilization in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Hossein Rashidi, Batool Behrouzi Lak, Tahereh ShahrokhTehrani, Ensiyeh Davari Tanha, Fatemeh J Family Reprod Health Original Article Objective: This study was conducted to compare the results of fixed versus flexible GnRH antagonist protocols in controlled ovarian stimulation for Intra Cytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) in patients with PCOS. Materials and methods: A randomized clinical trial was performed on 100 PCOS women, who were admitted to a tertiary infertility clinic and were candidate for IVF/ICSI. They were divided into two groups based on the GnRH antagonist protocol. We started GnRH antagonist 0.25mg in flexible protocol when a follicle ≥ 14 mm in diameter was seen in transvaginalsonography (Group 1). In fixed protocol, GnRH antagonist was administered from day 6 of stimulation (Group 2). Number of oocytes in methapase 2, number of developed and frozen embryo as main outcome and days of stimulation, number of gonadotropin and antagonist used assecondry outcome measures were assessed and compared between the two groups. Results: The days of stimulation and the number of antagonist used was not significantly different between fixed and flexible group (p ≥ 0.05).Although the number of gonadotropin injections was significantly lower in flexible group (p = 0.03), the number of oocyte retrieved and the number of embryo which cryopreserved was significantly higher in flexible compared to fixed protocol (p < 0.01). Conclusion: It seems using flexible antagonist protocol in PCOS infertile patients is in favor of better outcomes in terms of number of good quality oocytes and embryo and possibility for cryopreservation for future cycles. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2015-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4662759/ /pubmed/26622314 Text en Copyright © Vali-e-Asr Reproductive Health Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hossein Rashidi, Batool
Behrouzi Lak, Tahereh
ShahrokhTehrani, Ensiyeh
Davari Tanha, Fatemeh
Fixed versus Flexible Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Antagonist Protocol in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for Invitro Fertilization in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
title Fixed versus Flexible Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Antagonist Protocol in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for Invitro Fertilization in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
title_full Fixed versus Flexible Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Antagonist Protocol in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for Invitro Fertilization in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
title_fullStr Fixed versus Flexible Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Antagonist Protocol in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for Invitro Fertilization in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Fixed versus Flexible Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Antagonist Protocol in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for Invitro Fertilization in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
title_short Fixed versus Flexible Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Antagonist Protocol in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for Invitro Fertilization in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
title_sort fixed versus flexible gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist protocol in controlled ovarian stimulation for invitro fertilization in women with polycystic ovary syndrome
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4662759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26622314
work_keys_str_mv AT hosseinrashidibatool fixedversusflexiblegonadotropinreleasinghormoneantagonistprotocolincontrolledovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationinwomenwithpolycysticovarysyndrome
AT behrouzilaktahereh fixedversusflexiblegonadotropinreleasinghormoneantagonistprotocolincontrolledovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationinwomenwithpolycysticovarysyndrome
AT shahrokhtehraniensiyeh fixedversusflexiblegonadotropinreleasinghormoneantagonistprotocolincontrolledovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationinwomenwithpolycysticovarysyndrome
AT davaritanhafatemeh fixedversusflexiblegonadotropinreleasinghormoneantagonistprotocolincontrolledovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationinwomenwithpolycysticovarysyndrome