Cargando…
A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating a Low-Volume PEG Solution Plus Ascorbic Acid versus Standard PEG Solution in Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy
Evaluation of polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution containing ascorbic acid (PEG-ASC) has been controversial in the point of its hyperosmolarity, especially in old population. So we therefore designed the present study to compare the efficacy, acceptability, tolerability, and safety of 1....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4662975/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26649036 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/326581 |
_version_ | 1782403229244456960 |
---|---|
author | Tajika, Masahiro Tanaka, Tsutomu Ishihara, Makoto Mizuno, Nobumasa Hara, Kazuo Hijioka, Susumu Imaoka, Hiroshi Sato, Takamitsu Yogi, Tatsuji Tsutsumi, Hideharu Fujiyoshi, Toshihisa Hieda, Nobuhiro Okuno, Nozomi Yoshida, Tsukasa Bhatia, Vikram Yatabe, Yasushi Yamao, Kenji Niwa, Yasumasa |
author_facet | Tajika, Masahiro Tanaka, Tsutomu Ishihara, Makoto Mizuno, Nobumasa Hara, Kazuo Hijioka, Susumu Imaoka, Hiroshi Sato, Takamitsu Yogi, Tatsuji Tsutsumi, Hideharu Fujiyoshi, Toshihisa Hieda, Nobuhiro Okuno, Nozomi Yoshida, Tsukasa Bhatia, Vikram Yatabe, Yasushi Yamao, Kenji Niwa, Yasumasa |
author_sort | Tajika, Masahiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | Evaluation of polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution containing ascorbic acid (PEG-ASC) has been controversial in the point of its hyperosmolarity, especially in old population. So we therefore designed the present study to compare the efficacy, acceptability, tolerability, and safety of 1.5 L PEG+ASC and 2 L standard PEG electrolyte solution (PEG-ELS), not only in the general population, but also in patients of advanced age. Randomization was stratified by age (<70 years or 70> years), and hematological and biochemical parameters were compared in each age group, especially with respect to the safety profile of each regimen. As a result, the 1.5-L PEG-ASC regimen had higher patient acceptability than the 2-L PEG-ELS regimen. Tolerability, bowel cleansing, and safety were similar between regimens. However, we demonstrated significant statistical changes in the hematological and biochemical parameters after taking bowel preparation solutions, not only in the PEG+ASC group, but also in the PEG-ELS group. No significant differences in the safety profile were found between subjects aged less than 70 years and those aged 70 years or more; nevertheless, regardless of age, proper hydration is needed throughout the bowel preparation process. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4662975 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46629752015-12-08 A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating a Low-Volume PEG Solution Plus Ascorbic Acid versus Standard PEG Solution in Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy Tajika, Masahiro Tanaka, Tsutomu Ishihara, Makoto Mizuno, Nobumasa Hara, Kazuo Hijioka, Susumu Imaoka, Hiroshi Sato, Takamitsu Yogi, Tatsuji Tsutsumi, Hideharu Fujiyoshi, Toshihisa Hieda, Nobuhiro Okuno, Nozomi Yoshida, Tsukasa Bhatia, Vikram Yatabe, Yasushi Yamao, Kenji Niwa, Yasumasa Gastroenterol Res Pract Clinical Study Evaluation of polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution containing ascorbic acid (PEG-ASC) has been controversial in the point of its hyperosmolarity, especially in old population. So we therefore designed the present study to compare the efficacy, acceptability, tolerability, and safety of 1.5 L PEG+ASC and 2 L standard PEG electrolyte solution (PEG-ELS), not only in the general population, but also in patients of advanced age. Randomization was stratified by age (<70 years or 70> years), and hematological and biochemical parameters were compared in each age group, especially with respect to the safety profile of each regimen. As a result, the 1.5-L PEG-ASC regimen had higher patient acceptability than the 2-L PEG-ELS regimen. Tolerability, bowel cleansing, and safety were similar between regimens. However, we demonstrated significant statistical changes in the hematological and biochemical parameters after taking bowel preparation solutions, not only in the PEG+ASC group, but also in the PEG-ELS group. No significant differences in the safety profile were found between subjects aged less than 70 years and those aged 70 years or more; nevertheless, regardless of age, proper hydration is needed throughout the bowel preparation process. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4662975/ /pubmed/26649036 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/326581 Text en Copyright © 2015 Masahiro Tajika et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Tajika, Masahiro Tanaka, Tsutomu Ishihara, Makoto Mizuno, Nobumasa Hara, Kazuo Hijioka, Susumu Imaoka, Hiroshi Sato, Takamitsu Yogi, Tatsuji Tsutsumi, Hideharu Fujiyoshi, Toshihisa Hieda, Nobuhiro Okuno, Nozomi Yoshida, Tsukasa Bhatia, Vikram Yatabe, Yasushi Yamao, Kenji Niwa, Yasumasa A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating a Low-Volume PEG Solution Plus Ascorbic Acid versus Standard PEG Solution in Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy |
title | A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating a Low-Volume PEG Solution Plus Ascorbic Acid versus Standard PEG Solution in Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy |
title_full | A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating a Low-Volume PEG Solution Plus Ascorbic Acid versus Standard PEG Solution in Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy |
title_fullStr | A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating a Low-Volume PEG Solution Plus Ascorbic Acid versus Standard PEG Solution in Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy |
title_full_unstemmed | A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating a Low-Volume PEG Solution Plus Ascorbic Acid versus Standard PEG Solution in Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy |
title_short | A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating a Low-Volume PEG Solution Plus Ascorbic Acid versus Standard PEG Solution in Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy |
title_sort | randomized controlled trial evaluating a low-volume peg solution plus ascorbic acid versus standard peg solution in bowel preparation for colonoscopy |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4662975/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26649036 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/326581 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tajikamasahiro arandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingalowvolumepegsolutionplusascorbicacidversusstandardpegsolutioninbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT tanakatsutomu arandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingalowvolumepegsolutionplusascorbicacidversusstandardpegsolutioninbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT ishiharamakoto arandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingalowvolumepegsolutionplusascorbicacidversusstandardpegsolutioninbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT mizunonobumasa arandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingalowvolumepegsolutionplusascorbicacidversusstandardpegsolutioninbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT harakazuo arandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingalowvolumepegsolutionplusascorbicacidversusstandardpegsolutioninbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT hijiokasusumu arandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingalowvolumepegsolutionplusascorbicacidversusstandardpegsolutioninbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT imaokahiroshi arandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingalowvolumepegsolutionplusascorbicacidversusstandardpegsolutioninbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT satotakamitsu arandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingalowvolumepegsolutionplusascorbicacidversusstandardpegsolutioninbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT yogitatsuji arandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingalowvolumepegsolutionplusascorbicacidversusstandardpegsolutioninbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT tsutsumihideharu arandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingalowvolumepegsolutionplusascorbicacidversusstandardpegsolutioninbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT fujiyoshitoshihisa arandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingalowvolumepegsolutionplusascorbicacidversusstandardpegsolutioninbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT hiedanobuhiro arandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingalowvolumepegsolutionplusascorbicacidversusstandardpegsolutioninbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT okunonozomi arandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingalowvolumepegsolutionplusascorbicacidversusstandardpegsolutioninbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT yoshidatsukasa arandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingalowvolumepegsolutionplusascorbicacidversusstandardpegsolutioninbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT bhatiavikram arandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingalowvolumepegsolutionplusascorbicacidversusstandardpegsolutioninbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT yatabeyasushi arandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingalowvolumepegsolutionplusascorbicacidversusstandardpegsolutioninbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT yamaokenji arandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingalowvolumepegsolutionplusascorbicacidversusstandardpegsolutioninbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT niwayasumasa arandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingalowvolumepegsolutionplusascorbicacidversusstandardpegsolutioninbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT tajikamasahiro randomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingalowvolumepegsolutionplusascorbicacidversusstandardpegsolutioninbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT tanakatsutomu randomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingalowvolumepegsolutionplusascorbicacidversusstandardpegsolutioninbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT ishiharamakoto randomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingalowvolumepegsolutionplusascorbicacidversusstandardpegsolutioninbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT mizunonobumasa randomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingalowvolumepegsolutionplusascorbicacidversusstandardpegsolutioninbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT harakazuo randomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingalowvolumepegsolutionplusascorbicacidversusstandardpegsolutioninbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT hijiokasusumu randomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingalowvolumepegsolutionplusascorbicacidversusstandardpegsolutioninbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT imaokahiroshi randomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingalowvolumepegsolutionplusascorbicacidversusstandardpegsolutioninbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT satotakamitsu randomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingalowvolumepegsolutionplusascorbicacidversusstandardpegsolutioninbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT yogitatsuji randomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingalowvolumepegsolutionplusascorbicacidversusstandardpegsolutioninbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT tsutsumihideharu randomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingalowvolumepegsolutionplusascorbicacidversusstandardpegsolutioninbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT fujiyoshitoshihisa randomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingalowvolumepegsolutionplusascorbicacidversusstandardpegsolutioninbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT hiedanobuhiro randomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingalowvolumepegsolutionplusascorbicacidversusstandardpegsolutioninbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT okunonozomi randomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingalowvolumepegsolutionplusascorbicacidversusstandardpegsolutioninbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT yoshidatsukasa randomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingalowvolumepegsolutionplusascorbicacidversusstandardpegsolutioninbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT bhatiavikram randomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingalowvolumepegsolutionplusascorbicacidversusstandardpegsolutioninbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT yatabeyasushi randomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingalowvolumepegsolutionplusascorbicacidversusstandardpegsolutioninbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT yamaokenji randomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingalowvolumepegsolutionplusascorbicacidversusstandardpegsolutioninbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy AT niwayasumasa randomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingalowvolumepegsolutionplusascorbicacidversusstandardpegsolutioninbowelpreparationforcolonoscopy |