Cargando…

Retreatment of Recurrent Internal Carotid-Posterior Communicating Artery Aneurysm after Coil Embolization

Internal carotid-posterior communicating artery (IC-PC) aneurysms account for more than 20% of all intracranial aneurysms. As a result of the increase in coiling, there has also been an increase in recurrent IC-PC aneurysms after coiling. We present our experience of 10 recurrent IC-PC aneurysms aft...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: TOYOTA, Shingo, TAKI, Takuyu, WAKAYAMA, Akatsuki, YOSHIMINE, Toshiki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japan Neurosurgical Society 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4663022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26437796
http://dx.doi.org/10.2176/nmc.oa.2015-0037
_version_ 1782403238377553920
author TOYOTA, Shingo
TAKI, Takuyu
WAKAYAMA, Akatsuki
YOSHIMINE, Toshiki
author_facet TOYOTA, Shingo
TAKI, Takuyu
WAKAYAMA, Akatsuki
YOSHIMINE, Toshiki
author_sort TOYOTA, Shingo
collection PubMed
description Internal carotid-posterior communicating artery (IC-PC) aneurysms account for more than 20% of all intracranial aneurysms. As a result of the increase in coiling, there has also been an increase in recurrent IC-PC aneurysms after coiling. We present our experience of 10 recurrent IC-PC aneurysms after coiling that were retreated using surgical or endovascular techniques in order to discuss the choice of treatment and the points of clipping without removal of coils. From 2007 to 2014, 10 recurrent IC-PC aneurysms after coiling were retreated. When the previous frames covered the aneurysms all around or almost around except a part of the neck, coiling was chosen. In other cases, clipping was chosen. Clipping was attempted without removal of coils when it was technically feasible. Among the 10 IC-PC aneurysms retreated, 3 were retreated with coiling and 7 were retreated with clipping. In all three cases retreated with coiling, almost complete occlusion was accomplished. In the seven cases retreated with clipping, coil extrusion was observed during surgery in six cases. In most of them, it was necessary to dissect strong adhesions around the coiled aneurysms and to utilize temporary occlusion of the internal carotid artery. In all seven cases, neck clipping was accomplished without the removal of coils. There were no neurological complications in any cases. The management of recurrent lesions of embolized IC-PC aneurysms requires appropriate choice of treatment using both coiling and clipping. Clipping, especially without the removal of coils, plays an important role in safe treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4663022
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The Japan Neurosurgical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46630222016-01-14 Retreatment of Recurrent Internal Carotid-Posterior Communicating Artery Aneurysm after Coil Embolization TOYOTA, Shingo TAKI, Takuyu WAKAYAMA, Akatsuki YOSHIMINE, Toshiki Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) Original Article Internal carotid-posterior communicating artery (IC-PC) aneurysms account for more than 20% of all intracranial aneurysms. As a result of the increase in coiling, there has also been an increase in recurrent IC-PC aneurysms after coiling. We present our experience of 10 recurrent IC-PC aneurysms after coiling that were retreated using surgical or endovascular techniques in order to discuss the choice of treatment and the points of clipping without removal of coils. From 2007 to 2014, 10 recurrent IC-PC aneurysms after coiling were retreated. When the previous frames covered the aneurysms all around or almost around except a part of the neck, coiling was chosen. In other cases, clipping was chosen. Clipping was attempted without removal of coils when it was technically feasible. Among the 10 IC-PC aneurysms retreated, 3 were retreated with coiling and 7 were retreated with clipping. In all three cases retreated with coiling, almost complete occlusion was accomplished. In the seven cases retreated with clipping, coil extrusion was observed during surgery in six cases. In most of them, it was necessary to dissect strong adhesions around the coiled aneurysms and to utilize temporary occlusion of the internal carotid artery. In all seven cases, neck clipping was accomplished without the removal of coils. There were no neurological complications in any cases. The management of recurrent lesions of embolized IC-PC aneurysms requires appropriate choice of treatment using both coiling and clipping. Clipping, especially without the removal of coils, plays an important role in safe treatment. The Japan Neurosurgical Society 2015-11 2015-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4663022/ /pubmed/26437796 http://dx.doi.org/10.2176/nmc.oa.2015-0037 Text en © 2015 The Japan Neurosurgical Society This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
TOYOTA, Shingo
TAKI, Takuyu
WAKAYAMA, Akatsuki
YOSHIMINE, Toshiki
Retreatment of Recurrent Internal Carotid-Posterior Communicating Artery Aneurysm after Coil Embolization
title Retreatment of Recurrent Internal Carotid-Posterior Communicating Artery Aneurysm after Coil Embolization
title_full Retreatment of Recurrent Internal Carotid-Posterior Communicating Artery Aneurysm after Coil Embolization
title_fullStr Retreatment of Recurrent Internal Carotid-Posterior Communicating Artery Aneurysm after Coil Embolization
title_full_unstemmed Retreatment of Recurrent Internal Carotid-Posterior Communicating Artery Aneurysm after Coil Embolization
title_short Retreatment of Recurrent Internal Carotid-Posterior Communicating Artery Aneurysm after Coil Embolization
title_sort retreatment of recurrent internal carotid-posterior communicating artery aneurysm after coil embolization
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4663022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26437796
http://dx.doi.org/10.2176/nmc.oa.2015-0037
work_keys_str_mv AT toyotashingo retreatmentofrecurrentinternalcarotidposteriorcommunicatingarteryaneurysmaftercoilembolization
AT takitakuyu retreatmentofrecurrentinternalcarotidposteriorcommunicatingarteryaneurysmaftercoilembolization
AT wakayamaakatsuki retreatmentofrecurrentinternalcarotidposteriorcommunicatingarteryaneurysmaftercoilembolization
AT yoshiminetoshiki retreatmentofrecurrentinternalcarotidposteriorcommunicatingarteryaneurysmaftercoilembolization