Cargando…

Interacting Effects of Instructions and Presentation Rate on Visual Statistical Learning

The statistical regularities of a sequence of visual shapes can be learned incidentally. Arciuli et al. (2014) recently argued that intentional instructions only improve learning at slow presentation rates as they favor the use of explicit strategies. The aim of the present study was (1) to test thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bertels, Julie, Destrebecqz, Arnaud, Franco, Ana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4663239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26648884
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01806
_version_ 1782403257744752640
author Bertels, Julie
Destrebecqz, Arnaud
Franco, Ana
author_facet Bertels, Julie
Destrebecqz, Arnaud
Franco, Ana
author_sort Bertels, Julie
collection PubMed
description The statistical regularities of a sequence of visual shapes can be learned incidentally. Arciuli et al. (2014) recently argued that intentional instructions only improve learning at slow presentation rates as they favor the use of explicit strategies. The aim of the present study was (1) to test this assumption directly by investigating how instructions (incidental vs. intentional) and presentation rate (fast vs. slow) affect the acquisition of knowledge and (2) to examine how these factors influence the conscious vs. unconscious nature of the knowledge acquired. To this aim, we exposed participants to four triplets of shapes, presented sequentially in a pseudo-random order, and assessed their degree of learning in a subsequent completion task that integrated confidence judgments. Supporting Arciuli et al.’s (2014) claim, participant performance only benefited from intentional instructions at slow presentation rates. Moreover, informing participants beforehand about the existence of statistical regularities increased their explicit knowledge of the sequences, an effect that was not modulated by presentation speed. These results support that, although visual statistical learning can take place incidentally and, to some extent, outside conscious awareness, factors such as presentation rate and prior knowledge can boost learning of these regularities, presumably by favoring the acquisition of explicit knowledge.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4663239
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46632392015-12-08 Interacting Effects of Instructions and Presentation Rate on Visual Statistical Learning Bertels, Julie Destrebecqz, Arnaud Franco, Ana Front Psychol Psychology The statistical regularities of a sequence of visual shapes can be learned incidentally. Arciuli et al. (2014) recently argued that intentional instructions only improve learning at slow presentation rates as they favor the use of explicit strategies. The aim of the present study was (1) to test this assumption directly by investigating how instructions (incidental vs. intentional) and presentation rate (fast vs. slow) affect the acquisition of knowledge and (2) to examine how these factors influence the conscious vs. unconscious nature of the knowledge acquired. To this aim, we exposed participants to four triplets of shapes, presented sequentially in a pseudo-random order, and assessed their degree of learning in a subsequent completion task that integrated confidence judgments. Supporting Arciuli et al.’s (2014) claim, participant performance only benefited from intentional instructions at slow presentation rates. Moreover, informing participants beforehand about the existence of statistical regularities increased their explicit knowledge of the sequences, an effect that was not modulated by presentation speed. These results support that, although visual statistical learning can take place incidentally and, to some extent, outside conscious awareness, factors such as presentation rate and prior knowledge can boost learning of these regularities, presumably by favoring the acquisition of explicit knowledge. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4663239/ /pubmed/26648884 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01806 Text en Copyright © 2015 Bertels, Destrebecqz and Franco. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Bertels, Julie
Destrebecqz, Arnaud
Franco, Ana
Interacting Effects of Instructions and Presentation Rate on Visual Statistical Learning
title Interacting Effects of Instructions and Presentation Rate on Visual Statistical Learning
title_full Interacting Effects of Instructions and Presentation Rate on Visual Statistical Learning
title_fullStr Interacting Effects of Instructions and Presentation Rate on Visual Statistical Learning
title_full_unstemmed Interacting Effects of Instructions and Presentation Rate on Visual Statistical Learning
title_short Interacting Effects of Instructions and Presentation Rate on Visual Statistical Learning
title_sort interacting effects of instructions and presentation rate on visual statistical learning
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4663239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26648884
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01806
work_keys_str_mv AT bertelsjulie interactingeffectsofinstructionsandpresentationrateonvisualstatisticallearning
AT destrebecqzarnaud interactingeffectsofinstructionsandpresentationrateonvisualstatisticallearning
AT francoana interactingeffectsofinstructionsandpresentationrateonvisualstatisticallearning