Cargando…
Comparison of Bone Loss around Bone Platform Shift and Non-Bone Platform Shift Implants After 12 Months
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present randomized clinical trial was to evaluate marginal bone loss around two types of implants modified at the neck area: Nobel Active and Nobel Replace Groovy, both manufactured by Nobel Biocare. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 25 Nobel Active and 21 Nobel Replace Gr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4663307/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26622270 |
_version_ | 1782403273345466368 |
---|---|
author | Rokn, Amir Reza Badri, Samareh Rasouli Ghahroudi, Amir Alireza Manasheof, Rebeca Kharazi Fard, Mohamad Javad Barikani, Hamidreza |
author_facet | Rokn, Amir Reza Badri, Samareh Rasouli Ghahroudi, Amir Alireza Manasheof, Rebeca Kharazi Fard, Mohamad Javad Barikani, Hamidreza |
author_sort | Rokn, Amir Reza |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present randomized clinical trial was to evaluate marginal bone loss around two types of implants modified at the neck area: Nobel Active and Nobel Replace Groovy, both manufactured by Nobel Biocare. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 25 Nobel Active and 21 Nobel Replace Groovy implants were included in the present study. The implants were placed based on the relevant protocol and patient inclusion and exclusion criteria. The amount of bone loss around implants was compared at 6 and 12-month intervals using digital periapical radiographs. RESULTS: The mean bone loss values in the Nobel Active and Nobel Replace Groovy groups were 0.682 mm and 0.645 mm, respectively, with no statistically significant difference based on the results of independent t-test (P=0.802). CONCLUSION: Use of both implant types yielded favorable results, with high durability. The two implant types exhibited no superiority over each other in terms of bone loss. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4663307 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Tehran University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46633072015-11-30 Comparison of Bone Loss around Bone Platform Shift and Non-Bone Platform Shift Implants After 12 Months Rokn, Amir Reza Badri, Samareh Rasouli Ghahroudi, Amir Alireza Manasheof, Rebeca Kharazi Fard, Mohamad Javad Barikani, Hamidreza J Dent (Tehran) Original Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present randomized clinical trial was to evaluate marginal bone loss around two types of implants modified at the neck area: Nobel Active and Nobel Replace Groovy, both manufactured by Nobel Biocare. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 25 Nobel Active and 21 Nobel Replace Groovy implants were included in the present study. The implants were placed based on the relevant protocol and patient inclusion and exclusion criteria. The amount of bone loss around implants was compared at 6 and 12-month intervals using digital periapical radiographs. RESULTS: The mean bone loss values in the Nobel Active and Nobel Replace Groovy groups were 0.682 mm and 0.645 mm, respectively, with no statistically significant difference based on the results of independent t-test (P=0.802). CONCLUSION: Use of both implant types yielded favorable results, with high durability. The two implant types exhibited no superiority over each other in terms of bone loss. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2015-03 2015-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4663307/ /pubmed/26622270 Text en Copyright© Dental Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Rokn, Amir Reza Badri, Samareh Rasouli Ghahroudi, Amir Alireza Manasheof, Rebeca Kharazi Fard, Mohamad Javad Barikani, Hamidreza Comparison of Bone Loss around Bone Platform Shift and Non-Bone Platform Shift Implants After 12 Months |
title | Comparison of Bone Loss around Bone Platform Shift and Non-Bone Platform Shift Implants After 12 Months |
title_full | Comparison of Bone Loss around Bone Platform Shift and Non-Bone Platform Shift Implants After 12 Months |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Bone Loss around Bone Platform Shift and Non-Bone Platform Shift Implants After 12 Months |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Bone Loss around Bone Platform Shift and Non-Bone Platform Shift Implants After 12 Months |
title_short | Comparison of Bone Loss around Bone Platform Shift and Non-Bone Platform Shift Implants After 12 Months |
title_sort | comparison of bone loss around bone platform shift and non-bone platform shift implants after 12 months |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4663307/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26622270 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT roknamirreza comparisonofbonelossaroundboneplatformshiftandnonboneplatformshiftimplantsafter12months AT badrisamareh comparisonofbonelossaroundboneplatformshiftandnonboneplatformshiftimplantsafter12months AT rasoulighahroudiamiralireza comparisonofbonelossaroundboneplatformshiftandnonboneplatformshiftimplantsafter12months AT manasheofrebeca comparisonofbonelossaroundboneplatformshiftandnonboneplatformshiftimplantsafter12months AT kharazifardmohamadjavad comparisonofbonelossaroundboneplatformshiftandnonboneplatformshiftimplantsafter12months AT barikanihamidreza comparisonofbonelossaroundboneplatformshiftandnonboneplatformshiftimplantsafter12months |