Cargando…

How common is isolated dysphasia among patients with stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis, and what is their outcome? Results from the SITS-ISTR

OBJECTIVES: To describe the frequency and outcome of isolated dysphasia among patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). DESIGN: Patients registered in the SITS International Stroke Thrombolysis Register (SITS-ISTR). PARTICIPANTS: Patients with stroke (N=58 293) treated with IVT between D...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lundström, Erik, Zini, Andrea, Wahlgren, Nils, Ahmed, Niaz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4663413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26608637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009109
_version_ 1782403291516239872
author Lundström, Erik
Zini, Andrea
Wahlgren, Nils
Ahmed, Niaz
author_facet Lundström, Erik
Zini, Andrea
Wahlgren, Nils
Ahmed, Niaz
author_sort Lundström, Erik
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To describe the frequency and outcome of isolated dysphasia among patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). DESIGN: Patients registered in the SITS International Stroke Thrombolysis Register (SITS-ISTR). PARTICIPANTS: Patients with stroke (N=58 293) treated with IVT between December 2002 and December 2012. SETTING: A multinational, prospective, observational monitoring register. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Isolated dysphasia and modified Rankin Scale (mRS). METHODS: We identified patients presenting with isolated dysphasia by reviewing items within the baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). We performed descriptive statistics for baseline and demographic data, and reported patients’ characteristics, radiological data and changes in their NIHSS score within 7 days and mRS score at 3 months. We also reported corresponding data from the general SITS-ISTR cohort. RESULTS: We found isolated dysphasia at baseline in 1.14% (663/58 293) of all patients treated with IVT patients. Patients with isolated dysphasia had a longer onset to treatment time, lower proportion of visible infarctions on admission imaging scan and atrial fibrillation, and were less often classified as having large vessels causing strokes, in comparison with the rest of the SITS-ISTR. Symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage occurred in 2.3% of patients per SITS-MOST definition and fatal outcome in 5.5%. At 7 days, 50% of patients with isolated dysphasia recovered completely and at 3 months, 86.3% patients were functionally independent (mRS score 0–2), 71.7% had an excellent outcome (mRS score 0–1) and 45.5% had an mRS score of 0. CONCLUSIONS: A low proportion of patients with isolated dysphasia are treated with IVT. Half of these patients were fully recovered at 7 days.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4663413
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46634132015-12-03 How common is isolated dysphasia among patients with stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis, and what is their outcome? Results from the SITS-ISTR Lundström, Erik Zini, Andrea Wahlgren, Nils Ahmed, Niaz BMJ Open Neurology OBJECTIVES: To describe the frequency and outcome of isolated dysphasia among patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). DESIGN: Patients registered in the SITS International Stroke Thrombolysis Register (SITS-ISTR). PARTICIPANTS: Patients with stroke (N=58 293) treated with IVT between December 2002 and December 2012. SETTING: A multinational, prospective, observational monitoring register. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Isolated dysphasia and modified Rankin Scale (mRS). METHODS: We identified patients presenting with isolated dysphasia by reviewing items within the baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). We performed descriptive statistics for baseline and demographic data, and reported patients’ characteristics, radiological data and changes in their NIHSS score within 7 days and mRS score at 3 months. We also reported corresponding data from the general SITS-ISTR cohort. RESULTS: We found isolated dysphasia at baseline in 1.14% (663/58 293) of all patients treated with IVT patients. Patients with isolated dysphasia had a longer onset to treatment time, lower proportion of visible infarctions on admission imaging scan and atrial fibrillation, and were less often classified as having large vessels causing strokes, in comparison with the rest of the SITS-ISTR. Symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage occurred in 2.3% of patients per SITS-MOST definition and fatal outcome in 5.5%. At 7 days, 50% of patients with isolated dysphasia recovered completely and at 3 months, 86.3% patients were functionally independent (mRS score 0–2), 71.7% had an excellent outcome (mRS score 0–1) and 45.5% had an mRS score of 0. CONCLUSIONS: A low proportion of patients with isolated dysphasia are treated with IVT. Half of these patients were fully recovered at 7 days. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4663413/ /pubmed/26608637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009109 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Neurology
Lundström, Erik
Zini, Andrea
Wahlgren, Nils
Ahmed, Niaz
How common is isolated dysphasia among patients with stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis, and what is their outcome? Results from the SITS-ISTR
title How common is isolated dysphasia among patients with stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis, and what is their outcome? Results from the SITS-ISTR
title_full How common is isolated dysphasia among patients with stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis, and what is their outcome? Results from the SITS-ISTR
title_fullStr How common is isolated dysphasia among patients with stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis, and what is their outcome? Results from the SITS-ISTR
title_full_unstemmed How common is isolated dysphasia among patients with stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis, and what is their outcome? Results from the SITS-ISTR
title_short How common is isolated dysphasia among patients with stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis, and what is their outcome? Results from the SITS-ISTR
title_sort how common is isolated dysphasia among patients with stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis, and what is their outcome? results from the sits-istr
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4663413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26608637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009109
work_keys_str_mv AT lundstromerik howcommonisisolateddysphasiaamongpatientswithstroketreatedwithintravenousthrombolysisandwhatistheiroutcomeresultsfromthesitsistr
AT ziniandrea howcommonisisolateddysphasiaamongpatientswithstroketreatedwithintravenousthrombolysisandwhatistheiroutcomeresultsfromthesitsistr
AT wahlgrennils howcommonisisolateddysphasiaamongpatientswithstroketreatedwithintravenousthrombolysisandwhatistheiroutcomeresultsfromthesitsistr
AT ahmedniaz howcommonisisolateddysphasiaamongpatientswithstroketreatedwithintravenousthrombolysisandwhatistheiroutcomeresultsfromthesitsistr