Cargando…

Evaluating the feasibility and effectiveness of a critical care discharge information pack for patients and their families: a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of an information pack, based on self-regulation theory, designed to support patients and their families immediately before, during and after discharge from an intensive care unit (ICU). DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective assessor-blinded pilot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bench, Suzanne, Day, Tina, Heelas, Karina, Hopkins, Philip, White, Catherine, Griffiths, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4663421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26614615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006852
_version_ 1782403293119512576
author Bench, Suzanne
Day, Tina
Heelas, Karina
Hopkins, Philip
White, Catherine
Griffiths, Peter
author_facet Bench, Suzanne
Day, Tina
Heelas, Karina
Hopkins, Philip
White, Catherine
Griffiths, Peter
author_sort Bench, Suzanne
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of an information pack, based on self-regulation theory, designed to support patients and their families immediately before, during and after discharge from an intensive care unit (ICU). DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective assessor-blinded pilot cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT; in conjunction with a questionnaire survey of trial participants’ experience) in 2 ICUs in England. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (+/− a family member) who had spent at least 72 h in an ICU, declared medically fit for discharge to a general ward. RANDOMISATION: Cluster randomisation (by day of discharge decision) was used to allocate participants to 1 of 3 study groups. INTERVENTION: A user-centred critical care discharge information pack (UCCDIP) containing 2 booklets; 1 for the patient (which included a personalised discharge summary) and 1 for the family, given prior to discharge to the ward. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Psychological well-being measured using Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scores (HADS), assessed at 5±1 days postunit discharge and 28 days/hospital discharge. Statistical significance (p≤0.05) was determined using χ(2) and Kruskal-Wallis (H). RESULTS: 158 patients were allocated to: intervention (UCCDIP; n=51), control 1: ad hoc verbal information (n=59), control 2: booklet published by ICUsteps (n=48). There were no statistically significant differences in the primary outcome. The a priori enrolment goal was not reached and attrition was high. Using HADS as a primary outcome measure, an estimated sample size of 286 is required to power a definitive trial. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this pilot RCT provide important preliminary data regarding the circumstances under which an intervention based on the principles of UCCDIP could be effective, and the sample size required to demonstrate this. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN47262088; results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4663421
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46634212015-12-03 Evaluating the feasibility and effectiveness of a critical care discharge information pack for patients and their families: a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial Bench, Suzanne Day, Tina Heelas, Karina Hopkins, Philip White, Catherine Griffiths, Peter BMJ Open Intensive Care OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of an information pack, based on self-regulation theory, designed to support patients and their families immediately before, during and after discharge from an intensive care unit (ICU). DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective assessor-blinded pilot cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT; in conjunction with a questionnaire survey of trial participants’ experience) in 2 ICUs in England. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (+/− a family member) who had spent at least 72 h in an ICU, declared medically fit for discharge to a general ward. RANDOMISATION: Cluster randomisation (by day of discharge decision) was used to allocate participants to 1 of 3 study groups. INTERVENTION: A user-centred critical care discharge information pack (UCCDIP) containing 2 booklets; 1 for the patient (which included a personalised discharge summary) and 1 for the family, given prior to discharge to the ward. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Psychological well-being measured using Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scores (HADS), assessed at 5±1 days postunit discharge and 28 days/hospital discharge. Statistical significance (p≤0.05) was determined using χ(2) and Kruskal-Wallis (H). RESULTS: 158 patients were allocated to: intervention (UCCDIP; n=51), control 1: ad hoc verbal information (n=59), control 2: booklet published by ICUsteps (n=48). There were no statistically significant differences in the primary outcome. The a priori enrolment goal was not reached and attrition was high. Using HADS as a primary outcome measure, an estimated sample size of 286 is required to power a definitive trial. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this pilot RCT provide important preliminary data regarding the circumstances under which an intervention based on the principles of UCCDIP could be effective, and the sample size required to demonstrate this. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN47262088; results. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4663421/ /pubmed/26614615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006852 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Intensive Care
Bench, Suzanne
Day, Tina
Heelas, Karina
Hopkins, Philip
White, Catherine
Griffiths, Peter
Evaluating the feasibility and effectiveness of a critical care discharge information pack for patients and their families: a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial
title Evaluating the feasibility and effectiveness of a critical care discharge information pack for patients and their families: a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial
title_full Evaluating the feasibility and effectiveness of a critical care discharge information pack for patients and their families: a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Evaluating the feasibility and effectiveness of a critical care discharge information pack for patients and their families: a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the feasibility and effectiveness of a critical care discharge information pack for patients and their families: a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial
title_short Evaluating the feasibility and effectiveness of a critical care discharge information pack for patients and their families: a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial
title_sort evaluating the feasibility and effectiveness of a critical care discharge information pack for patients and their families: a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial
topic Intensive Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4663421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26614615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006852
work_keys_str_mv AT benchsuzanne evaluatingthefeasibilityandeffectivenessofacriticalcaredischargeinformationpackforpatientsandtheirfamiliesapilotclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT daytina evaluatingthefeasibilityandeffectivenessofacriticalcaredischargeinformationpackforpatientsandtheirfamiliesapilotclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT heelaskarina evaluatingthefeasibilityandeffectivenessofacriticalcaredischargeinformationpackforpatientsandtheirfamiliesapilotclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hopkinsphilip evaluatingthefeasibilityandeffectivenessofacriticalcaredischargeinformationpackforpatientsandtheirfamiliesapilotclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT whitecatherine evaluatingthefeasibilityandeffectivenessofacriticalcaredischargeinformationpackforpatientsandtheirfamiliesapilotclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT griffithspeter evaluatingthefeasibilityandeffectivenessofacriticalcaredischargeinformationpackforpatientsandtheirfamiliesapilotclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial