Cargando…
EVerT2—needling versus non-surgical debridement for the treatment of verrucae: study protocol for a single-centre randomised controlled trial
INTRODUCTION: Verrucae are extremely common, and are experienced by most people at some time during their lives. Although most verrucae will spontaneously disappear without treatment, many patients seek treatment, often because they have persisted for many years, are unsightly or painful or prevent...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4663427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26603251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009406 |
_version_ | 1782403294505730048 |
---|---|
author | Hashmi, Farina Torgerson, David Fairhurst, Caroline Cockayne, Sarah Bell, Kerry Cullen, Michelle Harrison-Blount, Michael |
author_facet | Hashmi, Farina Torgerson, David Fairhurst, Caroline Cockayne, Sarah Bell, Kerry Cullen, Michelle Harrison-Blount, Michael |
author_sort | Hashmi, Farina |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Verrucae are extremely common, and are experienced by most people at some time during their lives. Although most verrucae will spontaneously disappear without treatment, many patients seek treatment, often because they have persisted for many years, are unsightly or painful or prevent them from doing sports or other activities. There are many different treatments available; including the Falknor's needling procedure. To date, there has only been one small trial evaluating the clinical effectiveness of this treatment and no health economic analysis has been undertaken. The Effective Verruca Treatments (EVerT2) trial aims to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the needling procedure for the treatment of verrucae. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This single-centre randomised controlled trial will recruit 58 participants (aged 18 years and over with a plantar verruca) from Salford Podiatry Clinic patient lists and the surrounding area. If the participant presents with multiple verrucae, an ‘index’ verruca (largest and thickest lesion) will be identified and patients will be randomised 1:1 to the intervention group to receive the needling treatment or the control group to have the callus overlying the verruca debrided. The primary outcome is complete clearance of the index verruca at 12 weeks after randomisation. Secondary outcomes include clearance and recurrence of the treated verruca, clearance of all verrucae, number of verrucae remaining, change in size of the index verruca, pain, and participant satisfaction. A cost-effectiveness analysis of the needling versus callus debridement will be carried out from the perspective of health services over a time horizon of 12 weeks. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained from the University of Salford, Department of Health Sciences Ethical Approval Committee (HSCR15/24) and the University of York, Department of Health Sciences Research Governance Committee (HSRGC/2014/98/B). Findings will be disseminated through publication and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN16429440. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4663427 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46634272015-12-03 EVerT2—needling versus non-surgical debridement for the treatment of verrucae: study protocol for a single-centre randomised controlled trial Hashmi, Farina Torgerson, David Fairhurst, Caroline Cockayne, Sarah Bell, Kerry Cullen, Michelle Harrison-Blount, Michael BMJ Open Dermatology INTRODUCTION: Verrucae are extremely common, and are experienced by most people at some time during their lives. Although most verrucae will spontaneously disappear without treatment, many patients seek treatment, often because they have persisted for many years, are unsightly or painful or prevent them from doing sports or other activities. There are many different treatments available; including the Falknor's needling procedure. To date, there has only been one small trial evaluating the clinical effectiveness of this treatment and no health economic analysis has been undertaken. The Effective Verruca Treatments (EVerT2) trial aims to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the needling procedure for the treatment of verrucae. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This single-centre randomised controlled trial will recruit 58 participants (aged 18 years and over with a plantar verruca) from Salford Podiatry Clinic patient lists and the surrounding area. If the participant presents with multiple verrucae, an ‘index’ verruca (largest and thickest lesion) will be identified and patients will be randomised 1:1 to the intervention group to receive the needling treatment or the control group to have the callus overlying the verruca debrided. The primary outcome is complete clearance of the index verruca at 12 weeks after randomisation. Secondary outcomes include clearance and recurrence of the treated verruca, clearance of all verrucae, number of verrucae remaining, change in size of the index verruca, pain, and participant satisfaction. A cost-effectiveness analysis of the needling versus callus debridement will be carried out from the perspective of health services over a time horizon of 12 weeks. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained from the University of Salford, Department of Health Sciences Ethical Approval Committee (HSCR15/24) and the University of York, Department of Health Sciences Research Governance Committee (HSRGC/2014/98/B). Findings will be disseminated through publication and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN16429440. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4663427/ /pubmed/26603251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009406 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Dermatology Hashmi, Farina Torgerson, David Fairhurst, Caroline Cockayne, Sarah Bell, Kerry Cullen, Michelle Harrison-Blount, Michael EVerT2—needling versus non-surgical debridement for the treatment of verrucae: study protocol for a single-centre randomised controlled trial |
title | EVerT2—needling versus non-surgical debridement for the treatment of verrucae: study protocol for a single-centre randomised controlled trial |
title_full | EVerT2—needling versus non-surgical debridement for the treatment of verrucae: study protocol for a single-centre randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | EVerT2—needling versus non-surgical debridement for the treatment of verrucae: study protocol for a single-centre randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | EVerT2—needling versus non-surgical debridement for the treatment of verrucae: study protocol for a single-centre randomised controlled trial |
title_short | EVerT2—needling versus non-surgical debridement for the treatment of verrucae: study protocol for a single-centre randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | evert2—needling versus non-surgical debridement for the treatment of verrucae: study protocol for a single-centre randomised controlled trial |
topic | Dermatology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4663427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26603251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009406 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hashmifarina evert2needlingversusnonsurgicaldebridementforthetreatmentofverrucaestudyprotocolforasinglecentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT torgersondavid evert2needlingversusnonsurgicaldebridementforthetreatmentofverrucaestudyprotocolforasinglecentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT fairhurstcaroline evert2needlingversusnonsurgicaldebridementforthetreatmentofverrucaestudyprotocolforasinglecentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT cockaynesarah evert2needlingversusnonsurgicaldebridementforthetreatmentofverrucaestudyprotocolforasinglecentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT bellkerry evert2needlingversusnonsurgicaldebridementforthetreatmentofverrucaestudyprotocolforasinglecentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT cullenmichelle evert2needlingversusnonsurgicaldebridementforthetreatmentofverrucaestudyprotocolforasinglecentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT harrisonblountmichael evert2needlingversusnonsurgicaldebridementforthetreatmentofverrucaestudyprotocolforasinglecentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial |