Cargando…
Specialised teams or personal continuity across inpatient and outpatient mental healthcare? Study protocol for a natural experiment
INTRODUCTION: Mental healthcare organisation can either pursue specialisation, that is, distinct clinicians and teams for inpatient and outpatient care or personal continuity of care, that is, the same primary clinician for a patient across the two settings. Little systematic research has compared t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4663441/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26608634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008996 |
_version_ | 1782403297664040960 |
---|---|
author | Giacco, Domenico Bird, Victoria Jane McCrone, Paul Lorant, Vincent Nicaise, Pablo Pfennig, Andrea Bauer, Michael Ruggeri, Mirella Lasalvia, Antonio Moskalewicz, Jacek Welbel, Marta Priebe, Stefan |
author_facet | Giacco, Domenico Bird, Victoria Jane McCrone, Paul Lorant, Vincent Nicaise, Pablo Pfennig, Andrea Bauer, Michael Ruggeri, Mirella Lasalvia, Antonio Moskalewicz, Jacek Welbel, Marta Priebe, Stefan |
author_sort | Giacco, Domenico |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Mental healthcare organisation can either pursue specialisation, that is, distinct clinicians and teams for inpatient and outpatient care or personal continuity of care, that is, the same primary clinician for a patient across the two settings. Little systematic research has compared these approaches. Existing studies subject have serious methodological shortcomings. Yet, costly reorganisations of services have been carried out in different European countries, inconsistently aiming to achieve specialisation or personal continuity of care. More reliable evidence is required on whether specialisation or continuity of care is more effective and cost-effective, and whether this varies for different patient groups and contexts. DESIGN AND METHODS: In a natural experiment, we aim to recruit at least 6000 patients consecutively admitted to inpatient psychiatric care in Belgium, Germany, Italy, Poland, and the UK. In each country, care approaches supporting specialisation and personal continuity coexist. Patients will be followed up at 1 year to compare outcomes, costs and experiences. Inclusion criteria are: 18 years of age or older; clinical diagnosis of psychosis, affective disorder or anxiety/somatisation disorder; sufficient command of the language of the host country; absence of cognitive deterioration and/or organic brain disorders; and capacity to provide informed consent. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained in all countries: (1) England: NRES Committee North East—Newcastle & North Tyneside (ref: 14/NE/1017); (2) Belgium: Comité d'Ethique hospitalo-facultaire des Cliniques St-Luc; (3) Germany: Ethical Board, Technische Universität Dresden; (4) Italy: Comitati Etici per la sperimentazione clinica (CESC) delle provincie di Verona, Rovigo, Vicenza, Treviso, Padova; (5) Poland: Komisja Bioetyczna przy Instytucie Psychiatrii i Neurologii w Warszawie. We will disseminate the findings through scientific publications and a study-specific website. At the end of the study, we will develop recommendations for policy decision-making, and organise national and international workshops with stakeholders. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN registry: ISRCTN40256812. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4663441 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46634412015-12-03 Specialised teams or personal continuity across inpatient and outpatient mental healthcare? Study protocol for a natural experiment Giacco, Domenico Bird, Victoria Jane McCrone, Paul Lorant, Vincent Nicaise, Pablo Pfennig, Andrea Bauer, Michael Ruggeri, Mirella Lasalvia, Antonio Moskalewicz, Jacek Welbel, Marta Priebe, Stefan BMJ Open Mental Health INTRODUCTION: Mental healthcare organisation can either pursue specialisation, that is, distinct clinicians and teams for inpatient and outpatient care or personal continuity of care, that is, the same primary clinician for a patient across the two settings. Little systematic research has compared these approaches. Existing studies subject have serious methodological shortcomings. Yet, costly reorganisations of services have been carried out in different European countries, inconsistently aiming to achieve specialisation or personal continuity of care. More reliable evidence is required on whether specialisation or continuity of care is more effective and cost-effective, and whether this varies for different patient groups and contexts. DESIGN AND METHODS: In a natural experiment, we aim to recruit at least 6000 patients consecutively admitted to inpatient psychiatric care in Belgium, Germany, Italy, Poland, and the UK. In each country, care approaches supporting specialisation and personal continuity coexist. Patients will be followed up at 1 year to compare outcomes, costs and experiences. Inclusion criteria are: 18 years of age or older; clinical diagnosis of psychosis, affective disorder or anxiety/somatisation disorder; sufficient command of the language of the host country; absence of cognitive deterioration and/or organic brain disorders; and capacity to provide informed consent. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained in all countries: (1) England: NRES Committee North East—Newcastle & North Tyneside (ref: 14/NE/1017); (2) Belgium: Comité d'Ethique hospitalo-facultaire des Cliniques St-Luc; (3) Germany: Ethical Board, Technische Universität Dresden; (4) Italy: Comitati Etici per la sperimentazione clinica (CESC) delle provincie di Verona, Rovigo, Vicenza, Treviso, Padova; (5) Poland: Komisja Bioetyczna przy Instytucie Psychiatrii i Neurologii w Warszawie. We will disseminate the findings through scientific publications and a study-specific website. At the end of the study, we will develop recommendations for policy decision-making, and organise national and international workshops with stakeholders. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN registry: ISRCTN40256812. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4663441/ /pubmed/26608634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008996 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Mental Health Giacco, Domenico Bird, Victoria Jane McCrone, Paul Lorant, Vincent Nicaise, Pablo Pfennig, Andrea Bauer, Michael Ruggeri, Mirella Lasalvia, Antonio Moskalewicz, Jacek Welbel, Marta Priebe, Stefan Specialised teams or personal continuity across inpatient and outpatient mental healthcare? Study protocol for a natural experiment |
title | Specialised teams or personal continuity across inpatient and outpatient mental healthcare? Study protocol for a natural experiment |
title_full | Specialised teams or personal continuity across inpatient and outpatient mental healthcare? Study protocol for a natural experiment |
title_fullStr | Specialised teams or personal continuity across inpatient and outpatient mental healthcare? Study protocol for a natural experiment |
title_full_unstemmed | Specialised teams or personal continuity across inpatient and outpatient mental healthcare? Study protocol for a natural experiment |
title_short | Specialised teams or personal continuity across inpatient and outpatient mental healthcare? Study protocol for a natural experiment |
title_sort | specialised teams or personal continuity across inpatient and outpatient mental healthcare? study protocol for a natural experiment |
topic | Mental Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4663441/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26608634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008996 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT giaccodomenico specialisedteamsorpersonalcontinuityacrossinpatientandoutpatientmentalhealthcarestudyprotocolforanaturalexperiment AT birdvictoriajane specialisedteamsorpersonalcontinuityacrossinpatientandoutpatientmentalhealthcarestudyprotocolforanaturalexperiment AT mccronepaul specialisedteamsorpersonalcontinuityacrossinpatientandoutpatientmentalhealthcarestudyprotocolforanaturalexperiment AT lorantvincent specialisedteamsorpersonalcontinuityacrossinpatientandoutpatientmentalhealthcarestudyprotocolforanaturalexperiment AT nicaisepablo specialisedteamsorpersonalcontinuityacrossinpatientandoutpatientmentalhealthcarestudyprotocolforanaturalexperiment AT pfennigandrea specialisedteamsorpersonalcontinuityacrossinpatientandoutpatientmentalhealthcarestudyprotocolforanaturalexperiment AT bauermichael specialisedteamsorpersonalcontinuityacrossinpatientandoutpatientmentalhealthcarestudyprotocolforanaturalexperiment AT ruggerimirella specialisedteamsorpersonalcontinuityacrossinpatientandoutpatientmentalhealthcarestudyprotocolforanaturalexperiment AT lasalviaantonio specialisedteamsorpersonalcontinuityacrossinpatientandoutpatientmentalhealthcarestudyprotocolforanaturalexperiment AT moskalewiczjacek specialisedteamsorpersonalcontinuityacrossinpatientandoutpatientmentalhealthcarestudyprotocolforanaturalexperiment AT welbelmarta specialisedteamsorpersonalcontinuityacrossinpatientandoutpatientmentalhealthcarestudyprotocolforanaturalexperiment AT priebestefan specialisedteamsorpersonalcontinuityacrossinpatientandoutpatientmentalhealthcarestudyprotocolforanaturalexperiment |