Cargando…
Probing Origin of Binding Difference of inhibitors to MDM2 and MDMX by Polarizable Molecular Dynamics Simulation and QM/MM-GBSA Calculation
Binding abilities of current inhibitors to MDMX are weaker than to MDM2. Polarizable molecular dynamics simulations (MD) followed by Quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics generalized Born surface area (QM//MM-GBSA) calculations were performed to investigate the binding difference of inhibitors to MD...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4663504/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26616018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep17421 |
_version_ | 1782403309963837440 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Jianzhong Wang, Jinan Zhang, Qinggang Chen, Kaixian Zhu, Weiliang |
author_facet | Chen, Jianzhong Wang, Jinan Zhang, Qinggang Chen, Kaixian Zhu, Weiliang |
author_sort | Chen, Jianzhong |
collection | PubMed |
description | Binding abilities of current inhibitors to MDMX are weaker than to MDM2. Polarizable molecular dynamics simulations (MD) followed by Quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics generalized Born surface area (QM//MM-GBSA) calculations were performed to investigate the binding difference of inhibitors to MDM2 and MDMX. The predicted binding free energies not only agree well with the experimental results, but also show that the decrease in van der Walls interactions of inhibitors with MDMX relative to MDM2 is a main factor of weaker bindings of inhibitors to MDMX. The analyses of dihedral angles based on MD trajectories suggest that the closed conformation formed by the residues M53 and Y99 in MDMX leads to a potential steric clash with inhibitors and prevents inhibitors from arriving in the deep of MDMX binding cleft, which reduces the van der Waals contacts of inhibitors with M53, V92, P95 and L98. The calculated results using the residue-based free energy decomposition method further prove that the interaction strength of inhibitors with M53, V92, P95 and L98 from MDMX are obviously reduced compared to MDM2. We expect that this study can provide significant theoretical guidance for designs of potent dual inhibitors to block the p53-MDM2/MDMX interactions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4663504 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46635042015-12-03 Probing Origin of Binding Difference of inhibitors to MDM2 and MDMX by Polarizable Molecular Dynamics Simulation and QM/MM-GBSA Calculation Chen, Jianzhong Wang, Jinan Zhang, Qinggang Chen, Kaixian Zhu, Weiliang Sci Rep Article Binding abilities of current inhibitors to MDMX are weaker than to MDM2. Polarizable molecular dynamics simulations (MD) followed by Quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics generalized Born surface area (QM//MM-GBSA) calculations were performed to investigate the binding difference of inhibitors to MDM2 and MDMX. The predicted binding free energies not only agree well with the experimental results, but also show that the decrease in van der Walls interactions of inhibitors with MDMX relative to MDM2 is a main factor of weaker bindings of inhibitors to MDMX. The analyses of dihedral angles based on MD trajectories suggest that the closed conformation formed by the residues M53 and Y99 in MDMX leads to a potential steric clash with inhibitors and prevents inhibitors from arriving in the deep of MDMX binding cleft, which reduces the van der Waals contacts of inhibitors with M53, V92, P95 and L98. The calculated results using the residue-based free energy decomposition method further prove that the interaction strength of inhibitors with M53, V92, P95 and L98 from MDMX are obviously reduced compared to MDM2. We expect that this study can provide significant theoretical guidance for designs of potent dual inhibitors to block the p53-MDM2/MDMX interactions. Nature Publishing Group 2015-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4663504/ /pubmed/26616018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep17421 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Chen, Jianzhong Wang, Jinan Zhang, Qinggang Chen, Kaixian Zhu, Weiliang Probing Origin of Binding Difference of inhibitors to MDM2 and MDMX by Polarizable Molecular Dynamics Simulation and QM/MM-GBSA Calculation |
title | Probing Origin of Binding Difference of inhibitors to MDM2 and MDMX by Polarizable Molecular Dynamics Simulation and QM/MM-GBSA Calculation |
title_full | Probing Origin of Binding Difference of inhibitors to MDM2 and MDMX by Polarizable Molecular Dynamics Simulation and QM/MM-GBSA Calculation |
title_fullStr | Probing Origin of Binding Difference of inhibitors to MDM2 and MDMX by Polarizable Molecular Dynamics Simulation and QM/MM-GBSA Calculation |
title_full_unstemmed | Probing Origin of Binding Difference of inhibitors to MDM2 and MDMX by Polarizable Molecular Dynamics Simulation and QM/MM-GBSA Calculation |
title_short | Probing Origin of Binding Difference of inhibitors to MDM2 and MDMX by Polarizable Molecular Dynamics Simulation and QM/MM-GBSA Calculation |
title_sort | probing origin of binding difference of inhibitors to mdm2 and mdmx by polarizable molecular dynamics simulation and qm/mm-gbsa calculation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4663504/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26616018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep17421 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenjianzhong probingoriginofbindingdifferenceofinhibitorstomdm2andmdmxbypolarizablemoleculardynamicssimulationandqmmmgbsacalculation AT wangjinan probingoriginofbindingdifferenceofinhibitorstomdm2andmdmxbypolarizablemoleculardynamicssimulationandqmmmgbsacalculation AT zhangqinggang probingoriginofbindingdifferenceofinhibitorstomdm2andmdmxbypolarizablemoleculardynamicssimulationandqmmmgbsacalculation AT chenkaixian probingoriginofbindingdifferenceofinhibitorstomdm2andmdmxbypolarizablemoleculardynamicssimulationandqmmmgbsacalculation AT zhuweiliang probingoriginofbindingdifferenceofinhibitorstomdm2andmdmxbypolarizablemoleculardynamicssimulationandqmmmgbsacalculation |