Cargando…

Probing Origin of Binding Difference of inhibitors to MDM2 and MDMX by Polarizable Molecular Dynamics Simulation and QM/MM-GBSA Calculation

Binding abilities of current inhibitors to MDMX are weaker than to MDM2. Polarizable molecular dynamics simulations (MD) followed by Quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics generalized Born surface area (QM//MM-GBSA) calculations were performed to investigate the binding difference of inhibitors to MD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Jianzhong, Wang, Jinan, Zhang, Qinggang, Chen, Kaixian, Zhu, Weiliang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4663504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26616018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep17421
_version_ 1782403309963837440
author Chen, Jianzhong
Wang, Jinan
Zhang, Qinggang
Chen, Kaixian
Zhu, Weiliang
author_facet Chen, Jianzhong
Wang, Jinan
Zhang, Qinggang
Chen, Kaixian
Zhu, Weiliang
author_sort Chen, Jianzhong
collection PubMed
description Binding abilities of current inhibitors to MDMX are weaker than to MDM2. Polarizable molecular dynamics simulations (MD) followed by Quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics generalized Born surface area (QM//MM-GBSA) calculations were performed to investigate the binding difference of inhibitors to MDM2 and MDMX. The predicted binding free energies not only agree well with the experimental results, but also show that the decrease in van der Walls interactions of inhibitors with MDMX relative to MDM2 is a main factor of weaker bindings of inhibitors to MDMX. The analyses of dihedral angles based on MD trajectories suggest that the closed conformation formed by the residues M53 and Y99 in MDMX leads to a potential steric clash with inhibitors and prevents inhibitors from arriving in the deep of MDMX binding cleft, which reduces the van der Waals contacts of inhibitors with M53, V92, P95 and L98. The calculated results using the residue-based free energy decomposition method further prove that the interaction strength of inhibitors with M53, V92, P95 and L98 from MDMX are obviously reduced compared to MDM2. We expect that this study can provide significant theoretical guidance for designs of potent dual inhibitors to block the p53-MDM2/MDMX interactions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4663504
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46635042015-12-03 Probing Origin of Binding Difference of inhibitors to MDM2 and MDMX by Polarizable Molecular Dynamics Simulation and QM/MM-GBSA Calculation Chen, Jianzhong Wang, Jinan Zhang, Qinggang Chen, Kaixian Zhu, Weiliang Sci Rep Article Binding abilities of current inhibitors to MDMX are weaker than to MDM2. Polarizable molecular dynamics simulations (MD) followed by Quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics generalized Born surface area (QM//MM-GBSA) calculations were performed to investigate the binding difference of inhibitors to MDM2 and MDMX. The predicted binding free energies not only agree well with the experimental results, but also show that the decrease in van der Walls interactions of inhibitors with MDMX relative to MDM2 is a main factor of weaker bindings of inhibitors to MDMX. The analyses of dihedral angles based on MD trajectories suggest that the closed conformation formed by the residues M53 and Y99 in MDMX leads to a potential steric clash with inhibitors and prevents inhibitors from arriving in the deep of MDMX binding cleft, which reduces the van der Waals contacts of inhibitors with M53, V92, P95 and L98. The calculated results using the residue-based free energy decomposition method further prove that the interaction strength of inhibitors with M53, V92, P95 and L98 from MDMX are obviously reduced compared to MDM2. We expect that this study can provide significant theoretical guidance for designs of potent dual inhibitors to block the p53-MDM2/MDMX interactions. Nature Publishing Group 2015-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4663504/ /pubmed/26616018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep17421 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Chen, Jianzhong
Wang, Jinan
Zhang, Qinggang
Chen, Kaixian
Zhu, Weiliang
Probing Origin of Binding Difference of inhibitors to MDM2 and MDMX by Polarizable Molecular Dynamics Simulation and QM/MM-GBSA Calculation
title Probing Origin of Binding Difference of inhibitors to MDM2 and MDMX by Polarizable Molecular Dynamics Simulation and QM/MM-GBSA Calculation
title_full Probing Origin of Binding Difference of inhibitors to MDM2 and MDMX by Polarizable Molecular Dynamics Simulation and QM/MM-GBSA Calculation
title_fullStr Probing Origin of Binding Difference of inhibitors to MDM2 and MDMX by Polarizable Molecular Dynamics Simulation and QM/MM-GBSA Calculation
title_full_unstemmed Probing Origin of Binding Difference of inhibitors to MDM2 and MDMX by Polarizable Molecular Dynamics Simulation and QM/MM-GBSA Calculation
title_short Probing Origin of Binding Difference of inhibitors to MDM2 and MDMX by Polarizable Molecular Dynamics Simulation and QM/MM-GBSA Calculation
title_sort probing origin of binding difference of inhibitors to mdm2 and mdmx by polarizable molecular dynamics simulation and qm/mm-gbsa calculation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4663504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26616018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep17421
work_keys_str_mv AT chenjianzhong probingoriginofbindingdifferenceofinhibitorstomdm2andmdmxbypolarizablemoleculardynamicssimulationandqmmmgbsacalculation
AT wangjinan probingoriginofbindingdifferenceofinhibitorstomdm2andmdmxbypolarizablemoleculardynamicssimulationandqmmmgbsacalculation
AT zhangqinggang probingoriginofbindingdifferenceofinhibitorstomdm2andmdmxbypolarizablemoleculardynamicssimulationandqmmmgbsacalculation
AT chenkaixian probingoriginofbindingdifferenceofinhibitorstomdm2andmdmxbypolarizablemoleculardynamicssimulationandqmmmgbsacalculation
AT zhuweiliang probingoriginofbindingdifferenceofinhibitorstomdm2andmdmxbypolarizablemoleculardynamicssimulationandqmmmgbsacalculation