Cargando…

Improving the safety of remote site emergency airway management

Airway management, particularly in non-theatre settings, is an area of anaesthesia and critical care associated with significant risk of morbidity & mortality, as highlighted during the 4th National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists (NAP4). A survey of junior anaesthetists at o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wijesuriya, Julian, Brand, Jonathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: British Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4663840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26734245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u202785.w1275
_version_ 1782403371814092800
author Wijesuriya, Julian
Brand, Jonathan
author_facet Wijesuriya, Julian
Brand, Jonathan
author_sort Wijesuriya, Julian
collection PubMed
description Airway management, particularly in non-theatre settings, is an area of anaesthesia and critical care associated with significant risk of morbidity & mortality, as highlighted during the 4th National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists (NAP4). A survey of junior anaesthetists at our hospital highlighted a lack of confidence and perceived lack of safety in emergency airway management, especially in non-theatre settings. We developed and implemented a multifaceted airway package designed to improve the safety of remote site airway management. A Rapid Sequence Induction (RSI) checklist was developed; this was combined with new advanced airway equipment and drugs bags. Additionally, new carbon dioxide detector filters were procured in order to comply with NAP4 monitoring recommendations. The RSI checklists were placed in key locations throughout the hospital and the drugs and advanced airway equipment bags were centralised in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). It was agreed with the senior nursing staff that an appropriately trained ICU nurse would attend all emergency situations with new airway resources upon request. Departmental guidelines were updated to include details of the new resources and the on-call anaesthetist's responsibilities regarding checks and maintenance. Following our intervention trainees reported higher confidence levels regarding remote site emergency airway management. Nine trusts within the Northern Region were surveyed and we found large variations in the provision of remote site airway management resources. Complications in remote site airway management due lack of available appropriate drugs, equipment or trained staff are potentially life threatening and completely avoidable. Utilising the intervention package an anaesthetist would be able to safely plan and prepare for airway management in any setting. They would subsequently have the drugs, equipment, and trained assistance required to manage any difficulties or complications. We suggest that this should be the gold standard of airway resource provision and is in line with NAP4 recommendations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4663840
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher British Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46638402016-01-05 Improving the safety of remote site emergency airway management Wijesuriya, Julian Brand, Jonathan BMJ Qual Improv Rep BMJ Quality Improvement Programme Airway management, particularly in non-theatre settings, is an area of anaesthesia and critical care associated with significant risk of morbidity & mortality, as highlighted during the 4th National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists (NAP4). A survey of junior anaesthetists at our hospital highlighted a lack of confidence and perceived lack of safety in emergency airway management, especially in non-theatre settings. We developed and implemented a multifaceted airway package designed to improve the safety of remote site airway management. A Rapid Sequence Induction (RSI) checklist was developed; this was combined with new advanced airway equipment and drugs bags. Additionally, new carbon dioxide detector filters were procured in order to comply with NAP4 monitoring recommendations. The RSI checklists were placed in key locations throughout the hospital and the drugs and advanced airway equipment bags were centralised in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). It was agreed with the senior nursing staff that an appropriately trained ICU nurse would attend all emergency situations with new airway resources upon request. Departmental guidelines were updated to include details of the new resources and the on-call anaesthetist's responsibilities regarding checks and maintenance. Following our intervention trainees reported higher confidence levels regarding remote site emergency airway management. Nine trusts within the Northern Region were surveyed and we found large variations in the provision of remote site airway management resources. Complications in remote site airway management due lack of available appropriate drugs, equipment or trained staff are potentially life threatening and completely avoidable. Utilising the intervention package an anaesthetist would be able to safely plan and prepare for airway management in any setting. They would subsequently have the drugs, equipment, and trained assistance required to manage any difficulties or complications. We suggest that this should be the gold standard of airway resource provision and is in line with NAP4 recommendations. British Publishing Group 2014-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4663840/ /pubmed/26734245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u202785.w1275 Text en © 2014, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode
spellingShingle BMJ Quality Improvement Programme
Wijesuriya, Julian
Brand, Jonathan
Improving the safety of remote site emergency airway management
title Improving the safety of remote site emergency airway management
title_full Improving the safety of remote site emergency airway management
title_fullStr Improving the safety of remote site emergency airway management
title_full_unstemmed Improving the safety of remote site emergency airway management
title_short Improving the safety of remote site emergency airway management
title_sort improving the safety of remote site emergency airway management
topic BMJ Quality Improvement Programme
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4663840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26734245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u202785.w1275
work_keys_str_mv AT wijesuriyajulian improvingthesafetyofremotesiteemergencyairwaymanagement
AT brandjonathan improvingthesafetyofremotesiteemergencyairwaymanagement