Cargando…

Macrofaunal Patterns in and around du Couedic and Bonney Submarine Canyons, South Australia

Two South Australian canyons, one shelf-incising (du Couedic) and one slope-limited (Bonney) were compared for macrofaunal patterns on the shelf and slope that spanned three water masses. It was hypothesized that community structure would (H1) significantly differ by water mass, (H2) show significan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Conlan, Kathleen E., Currie, David R., Dittmann, Sabine, Sorokin, Shirley J., Hendrycks, Ed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4664417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26618354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143921
_version_ 1782403421140156416
author Conlan, Kathleen E.
Currie, David R.
Dittmann, Sabine
Sorokin, Shirley J.
Hendrycks, Ed
author_facet Conlan, Kathleen E.
Currie, David R.
Dittmann, Sabine
Sorokin, Shirley J.
Hendrycks, Ed
author_sort Conlan, Kathleen E.
collection PubMed
description Two South Australian canyons, one shelf-incising (du Couedic) and one slope-limited (Bonney) were compared for macrofaunal patterns on the shelf and slope that spanned three water masses. It was hypothesized that community structure would (H1) significantly differ by water mass, (H2) show significant regional differences and (H3) differ significantly between interior and exterior of each canyon. Five hundred and thirty-one species of macrofauna ≥1 mm were captured at 27 stations situated in depth stratified transects inside and outside the canyons from 100 to1500 m depth. The macrofauna showed a positive relationship to depth in abundance, biomass, species richness and community composition while taxonomic distinctness and evenness remained high at all depths. Biotic variation on the shelf was best defined by variation in bottom water primary production while sediment characteristics and bottom water oxygen, temperature and nutrients defined biotic variation at greater depth. Community structure differed significantly (p<0.01) among the three water masses (shelf-flowing South Australian current, upper slope Flinders current and lower slope Antarctic Intermediate Water) (H1). Although community differences between the du Couedic and Bonney regions were marginally above significance at p = 0.05 (H2), over half of the species captured were unique to each region. This supports the evidence from fish and megafaunal distributions that the du Couedic and Bonney areas are in different bioregions. Overall, the canyon interiors were not significantly different in community composition from the exterior (H3). However, both canyons had higher abundance and/or biomass, increased species dominance, different species composition and coarser sediments near the canyon heads compared to outside the canyons at the same depth (500 m), suggestive of heightened currents within the canyons that influence community composition there. At 1000–1500 m, the canyon interiors were depauperate, typical of V-shaped canyons elsewhere. The large number of species captured, given the relatively low sampling effort and focus on the larger macrofauna, support previous studies that identify the South Australian coast as a high biodiversity area.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4664417
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46644172015-12-10 Macrofaunal Patterns in and around du Couedic and Bonney Submarine Canyons, South Australia Conlan, Kathleen E. Currie, David R. Dittmann, Sabine Sorokin, Shirley J. Hendrycks, Ed PLoS One Research Article Two South Australian canyons, one shelf-incising (du Couedic) and one slope-limited (Bonney) were compared for macrofaunal patterns on the shelf and slope that spanned three water masses. It was hypothesized that community structure would (H1) significantly differ by water mass, (H2) show significant regional differences and (H3) differ significantly between interior and exterior of each canyon. Five hundred and thirty-one species of macrofauna ≥1 mm were captured at 27 stations situated in depth stratified transects inside and outside the canyons from 100 to1500 m depth. The macrofauna showed a positive relationship to depth in abundance, biomass, species richness and community composition while taxonomic distinctness and evenness remained high at all depths. Biotic variation on the shelf was best defined by variation in bottom water primary production while sediment characteristics and bottom water oxygen, temperature and nutrients defined biotic variation at greater depth. Community structure differed significantly (p<0.01) among the three water masses (shelf-flowing South Australian current, upper slope Flinders current and lower slope Antarctic Intermediate Water) (H1). Although community differences between the du Couedic and Bonney regions were marginally above significance at p = 0.05 (H2), over half of the species captured were unique to each region. This supports the evidence from fish and megafaunal distributions that the du Couedic and Bonney areas are in different bioregions. Overall, the canyon interiors were not significantly different in community composition from the exterior (H3). However, both canyons had higher abundance and/or biomass, increased species dominance, different species composition and coarser sediments near the canyon heads compared to outside the canyons at the same depth (500 m), suggestive of heightened currents within the canyons that influence community composition there. At 1000–1500 m, the canyon interiors were depauperate, typical of V-shaped canyons elsewhere. The large number of species captured, given the relatively low sampling effort and focus on the larger macrofauna, support previous studies that identify the South Australian coast as a high biodiversity area. Public Library of Science 2015-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4664417/ /pubmed/26618354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143921 Text en © 2015 Conlan et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Conlan, Kathleen E.
Currie, David R.
Dittmann, Sabine
Sorokin, Shirley J.
Hendrycks, Ed
Macrofaunal Patterns in and around du Couedic and Bonney Submarine Canyons, South Australia
title Macrofaunal Patterns in and around du Couedic and Bonney Submarine Canyons, South Australia
title_full Macrofaunal Patterns in and around du Couedic and Bonney Submarine Canyons, South Australia
title_fullStr Macrofaunal Patterns in and around du Couedic and Bonney Submarine Canyons, South Australia
title_full_unstemmed Macrofaunal Patterns in and around du Couedic and Bonney Submarine Canyons, South Australia
title_short Macrofaunal Patterns in and around du Couedic and Bonney Submarine Canyons, South Australia
title_sort macrofaunal patterns in and around du couedic and bonney submarine canyons, south australia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4664417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26618354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143921
work_keys_str_mv AT conlankathleene macrofaunalpatternsinandaroundducouedicandbonneysubmarinecanyonssouthaustralia
AT curriedavidr macrofaunalpatternsinandaroundducouedicandbonneysubmarinecanyonssouthaustralia
AT dittmannsabine macrofaunalpatternsinandaroundducouedicandbonneysubmarinecanyonssouthaustralia
AT sorokinshirleyj macrofaunalpatternsinandaroundducouedicandbonneysubmarinecanyonssouthaustralia
AT hendrycksed macrofaunalpatternsinandaroundducouedicandbonneysubmarinecanyonssouthaustralia