Cargando…

Intra-/Interobserver Agreement of Enhancement Pattern for Pancreatic Head Lesions Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: According to EFSUMB Guidelines

Objective: To evaluate the intra-/interobserver agreement of the visual interpretation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of pancreatic head lesions and its concordance with the histological test results. Material and Methods: Two observers (A + B) evaluated by simple visual interpretation 40 co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grossjohann, Hanne Sønder, Ewertsen, Caroline, Svendsen, Lars Bo, Nielsen, Michael Bachmann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4665461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26859393
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics2020002
_version_ 1782403574150463488
author Grossjohann, Hanne Sønder
Ewertsen, Caroline
Svendsen, Lars Bo
Nielsen, Michael Bachmann
author_facet Grossjohann, Hanne Sønder
Ewertsen, Caroline
Svendsen, Lars Bo
Nielsen, Michael Bachmann
author_sort Grossjohann, Hanne Sønder
collection PubMed
description Objective: To evaluate the intra-/interobserver agreement of the visual interpretation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of pancreatic head lesions and its concordance with the histological test results. Material and Methods: Two observers (A + B) evaluated by simple visual interpretation 40 consecutive CEUS examinations of pancreatic head lesions and one of the observers evaluated the examinations twice (A1 + A2). The examinations were evaluated according to the criteria outlined in EFSUMB guidelines. The two experienced observers were blinded to histological evidence and clinical information of tumor type and to each other’s results. Results: The kappa value for the intraobserver evaluation between observer A1 and A2 was 0.89, equating to almost perfect agreement. The kappa value for the interobserver evaluation between observer A1 and B was 0.76 and between observer A2 and B it was 0.75, both equating to substantial agreement. Evaluation of the visual interpretation compared to the histological test result showed a positive predictive value for A1, A2 and B versus biopsy of 97%, 94% and 90% respectively and an accuracy of 83%, 88% and 73% respectively. Conclusions: Visual interpretation for assessment of contrast enhancement of pancreatic head lesions seemed to be an accurate method with reproducible results and good concordance with the histological test results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4665461
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46654612016-01-27 Intra-/Interobserver Agreement of Enhancement Pattern for Pancreatic Head Lesions Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: According to EFSUMB Guidelines Grossjohann, Hanne Sønder Ewertsen, Caroline Svendsen, Lars Bo Nielsen, Michael Bachmann Diagnostics (Basel) Article Objective: To evaluate the intra-/interobserver agreement of the visual interpretation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of pancreatic head lesions and its concordance with the histological test results. Material and Methods: Two observers (A + B) evaluated by simple visual interpretation 40 consecutive CEUS examinations of pancreatic head lesions and one of the observers evaluated the examinations twice (A1 + A2). The examinations were evaluated according to the criteria outlined in EFSUMB guidelines. The two experienced observers were blinded to histological evidence and clinical information of tumor type and to each other’s results. Results: The kappa value for the intraobserver evaluation between observer A1 and A2 was 0.89, equating to almost perfect agreement. The kappa value for the interobserver evaluation between observer A1 and B was 0.76 and between observer A2 and B it was 0.75, both equating to substantial agreement. Evaluation of the visual interpretation compared to the histological test result showed a positive predictive value for A1, A2 and B versus biopsy of 97%, 94% and 90% respectively and an accuracy of 83%, 88% and 73% respectively. Conclusions: Visual interpretation for assessment of contrast enhancement of pancreatic head lesions seemed to be an accurate method with reproducible results and good concordance with the histological test results. MDPI 2012-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4665461/ /pubmed/26859393 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics2020002 Text en © 2012 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Grossjohann, Hanne Sønder
Ewertsen, Caroline
Svendsen, Lars Bo
Nielsen, Michael Bachmann
Intra-/Interobserver Agreement of Enhancement Pattern for Pancreatic Head Lesions Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: According to EFSUMB Guidelines
title Intra-/Interobserver Agreement of Enhancement Pattern for Pancreatic Head Lesions Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: According to EFSUMB Guidelines
title_full Intra-/Interobserver Agreement of Enhancement Pattern for Pancreatic Head Lesions Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: According to EFSUMB Guidelines
title_fullStr Intra-/Interobserver Agreement of Enhancement Pattern for Pancreatic Head Lesions Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: According to EFSUMB Guidelines
title_full_unstemmed Intra-/Interobserver Agreement of Enhancement Pattern for Pancreatic Head Lesions Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: According to EFSUMB Guidelines
title_short Intra-/Interobserver Agreement of Enhancement Pattern for Pancreatic Head Lesions Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: According to EFSUMB Guidelines
title_sort intra-/interobserver agreement of enhancement pattern for pancreatic head lesions using contrast-enhanced ultrasound: according to efsumb guidelines
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4665461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26859393
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics2020002
work_keys_str_mv AT grossjohannhannesønder intrainterobserveragreementofenhancementpatternforpancreaticheadlesionsusingcontrastenhancedultrasoundaccordingtoefsumbguidelines
AT ewertsencaroline intrainterobserveragreementofenhancementpatternforpancreaticheadlesionsusingcontrastenhancedultrasoundaccordingtoefsumbguidelines
AT svendsenlarsbo intrainterobserveragreementofenhancementpatternforpancreaticheadlesionsusingcontrastenhancedultrasoundaccordingtoefsumbguidelines
AT nielsenmichaelbachmann intrainterobserveragreementofenhancementpatternforpancreaticheadlesionsusingcontrastenhancedultrasoundaccordingtoefsumbguidelines