Cargando…
Importance of Attenuation Correction (AC) for Small Animal PET Imaging
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a correction for annihilation photon attenuation in small objects such as mice is necessary. The attenuation recovery for specific organs and subcutaneous tumors was investigated. A comparison between different attenuation correction methods was p...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4665554/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26859397 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics2040042 |
_version_ | 1782403594757079040 |
---|---|
author | El Ali, Henrik H. Bodholdt, Rasmus Poul Jørgensen, Jesper Tranekjær Myschetzky, Rebecca Kjaer, Andreas |
author_facet | El Ali, Henrik H. Bodholdt, Rasmus Poul Jørgensen, Jesper Tranekjær Myschetzky, Rebecca Kjaer, Andreas |
author_sort | El Ali, Henrik H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a correction for annihilation photon attenuation in small objects such as mice is necessary. The attenuation recovery for specific organs and subcutaneous tumors was investigated. A comparison between different attenuation correction methods was performed. Methods: Ten NMRI nude mice with subcutaneous implantation of human breast cancer cells (MCF-7) were scanned consecutively in small animal PET and CT scanners (MicroPET(TM) Focus 120 and ImTek’s MicroCAT(TM) II). CT-based AC, PET-based AC and uniform AC methods were compared. Results: The activity concentration in the same organ with and without AC revealed an overall attenuation recovery of 9–21% for MAP reconstructed images, i.e., SUV without AC could underestimate the true activity at this level. For subcutaneous tumors, the attenuation was 13 ± 4% (9–17%), for kidneys 20 ± 1% (19–21%), and for bladder 18 ± 3% (15–21%). The FBP reconstructed images showed almost the same attenuation levels as the MAP reconstructed images for all organs. Conclusions: The annihilation photons are suffering attenuation even in small subjects. Both PET-based and CT-based are adequate as AC methods. The amplitude of the AC recovery could be overestimated using the uniform map. Therefore, application of a global attenuation factor on PET data might not be accurate for attenuation correction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4665554 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46655542016-01-27 Importance of Attenuation Correction (AC) for Small Animal PET Imaging El Ali, Henrik H. Bodholdt, Rasmus Poul Jørgensen, Jesper Tranekjær Myschetzky, Rebecca Kjaer, Andreas Diagnostics (Basel) Article The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a correction for annihilation photon attenuation in small objects such as mice is necessary. The attenuation recovery for specific organs and subcutaneous tumors was investigated. A comparison between different attenuation correction methods was performed. Methods: Ten NMRI nude mice with subcutaneous implantation of human breast cancer cells (MCF-7) were scanned consecutively in small animal PET and CT scanners (MicroPET(TM) Focus 120 and ImTek’s MicroCAT(TM) II). CT-based AC, PET-based AC and uniform AC methods were compared. Results: The activity concentration in the same organ with and without AC revealed an overall attenuation recovery of 9–21% for MAP reconstructed images, i.e., SUV without AC could underestimate the true activity at this level. For subcutaneous tumors, the attenuation was 13 ± 4% (9–17%), for kidneys 20 ± 1% (19–21%), and for bladder 18 ± 3% (15–21%). The FBP reconstructed images showed almost the same attenuation levels as the MAP reconstructed images for all organs. Conclusions: The annihilation photons are suffering attenuation even in small subjects. Both PET-based and CT-based are adequate as AC methods. The amplitude of the AC recovery could be overestimated using the uniform map. Therefore, application of a global attenuation factor on PET data might not be accurate for attenuation correction. MDPI 2012-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4665554/ /pubmed/26859397 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics2040042 Text en © 2012 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article El Ali, Henrik H. Bodholdt, Rasmus Poul Jørgensen, Jesper Tranekjær Myschetzky, Rebecca Kjaer, Andreas Importance of Attenuation Correction (AC) for Small Animal PET Imaging |
title | Importance of Attenuation Correction (AC) for Small Animal PET Imaging |
title_full | Importance of Attenuation Correction (AC) for Small Animal PET Imaging |
title_fullStr | Importance of Attenuation Correction (AC) for Small Animal PET Imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | Importance of Attenuation Correction (AC) for Small Animal PET Imaging |
title_short | Importance of Attenuation Correction (AC) for Small Animal PET Imaging |
title_sort | importance of attenuation correction (ac) for small animal pet imaging |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4665554/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26859397 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics2040042 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elalihenrikh importanceofattenuationcorrectionacforsmallanimalpetimaging AT bodholdtrasmuspoul importanceofattenuationcorrectionacforsmallanimalpetimaging AT jørgensenjespertranekjær importanceofattenuationcorrectionacforsmallanimalpetimaging AT myschetzkyrebecca importanceofattenuationcorrectionacforsmallanimalpetimaging AT kjaerandreas importanceofattenuationcorrectionacforsmallanimalpetimaging |