Cargando…

Effectiveness and implementation of interventions to increase commuter cycling to school: a quasi-experimental study

BACKGROUND: Active transportation to school has been positively associated with various health parameters whereas only sparse evidence exists on risk of injury while commuting to school. This study investigated the overall effectiveness of cycling promotion combined with structural changes on cyclin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Østergaard, Lars, Støckel, Jan Toftegaard, Andersen, Lars Bo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4665862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26619996
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2536-1
_version_ 1782403627178000384
author Østergaard, Lars
Støckel, Jan Toftegaard
Andersen, Lars Bo
author_facet Østergaard, Lars
Støckel, Jan Toftegaard
Andersen, Lars Bo
author_sort Østergaard, Lars
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Active transportation to school has been positively associated with various health parameters whereas only sparse evidence exists on risk of injury while commuting to school. This study investigated the overall effectiveness of cycling promotion combined with structural changes on cycling to school. METHODS: Interventions at public schools in three different regions in Denmark were based on planned infrastructural changes near schools (e.g. road surface and traffic regulation) and school-motivation for promoting commuter cycling. Participants were pupils from control schools (n = 12) or intervention schools (n = 13). All children (n = 2415) from the 4(th) and 5(th) grade were measured at baseline during spring 2010 and at follow-up one year later. RESULTS: No significant differences in commuter cycling were detected in the adjusted analyses comparing the intervention with the control group neither when assessed as changes in short term (beta: 0.15 trips/week, p = 0.463) nor when assessed as changes in long term school cycling (beta: −0.02 units, p = 0.485). No differences were observed neither in the incidence of traffic injuries nor in the characteristics of injuries when comparing the control group and the intervention group. Approximately 50 % of all traffic injuries occurred during school transport with most injuries categorized as solo injuries. The only significant predictor of future traffic injuries was previous school transport injuries. CONCLUSION: This multifaceted school cycling promotion programme did not affect school cycling behaviour or the health parameters assessed. Implementation issues relevant in the planning of future school cycling interventions are discussed in the article. The one year incidence of being involved in a traffic injury was approximately 25 % with almost 50 % of all traffic injuries occurred during school transport. Previous school transport injury predicted future school traffic injuries. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-015-2536-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4665862
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46658622015-12-02 Effectiveness and implementation of interventions to increase commuter cycling to school: a quasi-experimental study Østergaard, Lars Støckel, Jan Toftegaard Andersen, Lars Bo BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Active transportation to school has been positively associated with various health parameters whereas only sparse evidence exists on risk of injury while commuting to school. This study investigated the overall effectiveness of cycling promotion combined with structural changes on cycling to school. METHODS: Interventions at public schools in three different regions in Denmark were based on planned infrastructural changes near schools (e.g. road surface and traffic regulation) and school-motivation for promoting commuter cycling. Participants were pupils from control schools (n = 12) or intervention schools (n = 13). All children (n = 2415) from the 4(th) and 5(th) grade were measured at baseline during spring 2010 and at follow-up one year later. RESULTS: No significant differences in commuter cycling were detected in the adjusted analyses comparing the intervention with the control group neither when assessed as changes in short term (beta: 0.15 trips/week, p = 0.463) nor when assessed as changes in long term school cycling (beta: −0.02 units, p = 0.485). No differences were observed neither in the incidence of traffic injuries nor in the characteristics of injuries when comparing the control group and the intervention group. Approximately 50 % of all traffic injuries occurred during school transport with most injuries categorized as solo injuries. The only significant predictor of future traffic injuries was previous school transport injuries. CONCLUSION: This multifaceted school cycling promotion programme did not affect school cycling behaviour or the health parameters assessed. Implementation issues relevant in the planning of future school cycling interventions are discussed in the article. The one year incidence of being involved in a traffic injury was approximately 25 % with almost 50 % of all traffic injuries occurred during school transport. Previous school transport injury predicted future school traffic injuries. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-015-2536-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4665862/ /pubmed/26619996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2536-1 Text en © Østergaard et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Østergaard, Lars
Støckel, Jan Toftegaard
Andersen, Lars Bo
Effectiveness and implementation of interventions to increase commuter cycling to school: a quasi-experimental study
title Effectiveness and implementation of interventions to increase commuter cycling to school: a quasi-experimental study
title_full Effectiveness and implementation of interventions to increase commuter cycling to school: a quasi-experimental study
title_fullStr Effectiveness and implementation of interventions to increase commuter cycling to school: a quasi-experimental study
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness and implementation of interventions to increase commuter cycling to school: a quasi-experimental study
title_short Effectiveness and implementation of interventions to increase commuter cycling to school: a quasi-experimental study
title_sort effectiveness and implementation of interventions to increase commuter cycling to school: a quasi-experimental study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4665862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26619996
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2536-1
work_keys_str_mv AT østergaardlars effectivenessandimplementationofinterventionstoincreasecommutercyclingtoschoolaquasiexperimentalstudy
AT støckeljantoftegaard effectivenessandimplementationofinterventionstoincreasecommutercyclingtoschoolaquasiexperimentalstudy
AT andersenlarsbo effectivenessandimplementationofinterventionstoincreasecommutercyclingtoschoolaquasiexperimentalstudy