Cargando…
Evaluating HBsAg rapid test performance for different biological samples from low and high infection rate settings & populations
BACKGROUND: Rapid tests (RTs) might have several advantages over standard laboratory procedures, increasing access to diagnosis, especially among vulnerable populations and/or those living in remote areas. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of RTs for the detection of hepatitis B...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4665901/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26619906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-1249-5 |
_version_ | 1782403634082873344 |
---|---|
author | Cruz, Helena Medina Scalioni, Leticia de Paula de Paula, Vanessa Salete da Silva, Elisangela Ferreira do Ó, Kycia Maria Rodrigues Milagres, Flavio Augusto Pádua Cruz, Marcelo Santos Bastos, Francisco Inácio Pollo-Flores, Priscila Leal, Erotildes Motta-Castro, Ana Rita Coimbra Pilotto, José Henrique Lewis-Ximenez, Lia Laura Lampe, Elisabeth Villar, Livia Melo |
author_facet | Cruz, Helena Medina Scalioni, Leticia de Paula de Paula, Vanessa Salete da Silva, Elisangela Ferreira do Ó, Kycia Maria Rodrigues Milagres, Flavio Augusto Pádua Cruz, Marcelo Santos Bastos, Francisco Inácio Pollo-Flores, Priscila Leal, Erotildes Motta-Castro, Ana Rita Coimbra Pilotto, José Henrique Lewis-Ximenez, Lia Laura Lampe, Elisabeth Villar, Livia Melo |
author_sort | Cruz, Helena Medina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Rapid tests (RTs) might have several advantages over standard laboratory procedures, increasing access to diagnosis, especially among vulnerable populations and/or those living in remote areas. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of RTs for the detection of hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) in samples from different populations/settings. METHODS: Three RTs for HBsAg detection (Vikia® HBsAg, HBsAg Teste Rápido®, and Imuno-Rápido HBsAg®) and different biological specimens (serum, whole blood, and saliva) were evaluated. Analyses comprised a reference panel and samples from field studies targeting suspected cases of hepatitis B virus (HBV) (G I), individuals living in deprived areas (G II), and highly vulnerable individuals (G III). Enzyme immunoassay (EIA) was defined as the gold standard in this study. Reproducibility, repeatability, and cross-reactivity with other infectious agents such as dengue, immunodeficiency (HIV), and hepatitis C (HCV) viruses and T. pallidum were determined. RESULTS: For the reference panel, the sensitivity and specificity of all HBsAg RTs were higher than 93.00 %. G I presented the highest kappa values for all rapid assays using sera samples. When using serum, the sensitivity values were higher than 93.40 for G I, 60.00 % for G II and 66.77 % for G III, and the specificity values were higher than 99.50 for GI, 97.20 for G II and 99.10 % for G III for all tests. For whole blood samples & the Vikia® HBsAg assay, the best performance was achieved for GIII (k = 79.75 %). For saliva samples, the Imuno-Rápido HBsAg® assay showed the highest concordance values with EIA for G I (40.68 %) and G II (32.20 %). The reproducibility and repeatability of all RTs for serum and saliva were excellent, and the concordance between HBsAg EIAs and RTs using samples reactive with other infectious agents varied from 70.10 % to 100.00 %. CONCLUSIONS: The overall performance of RTs for HBsAg in serum was high/moderately high for all groups, thereby promoting increased access to HBV diagnosis among vulnerable populations as well as samples from individuals in emergency settings or remote areas. Rapid tests for HBsAg using whole blood could be used in prevalence studies, though these assays should not be used for saliva samples. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-015-1249-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4665901 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46659012015-12-02 Evaluating HBsAg rapid test performance for different biological samples from low and high infection rate settings & populations Cruz, Helena Medina Scalioni, Leticia de Paula de Paula, Vanessa Salete da Silva, Elisangela Ferreira do Ó, Kycia Maria Rodrigues Milagres, Flavio Augusto Pádua Cruz, Marcelo Santos Bastos, Francisco Inácio Pollo-Flores, Priscila Leal, Erotildes Motta-Castro, Ana Rita Coimbra Pilotto, José Henrique Lewis-Ximenez, Lia Laura Lampe, Elisabeth Villar, Livia Melo BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Rapid tests (RTs) might have several advantages over standard laboratory procedures, increasing access to diagnosis, especially among vulnerable populations and/or those living in remote areas. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of RTs for the detection of hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) in samples from different populations/settings. METHODS: Three RTs for HBsAg detection (Vikia® HBsAg, HBsAg Teste Rápido®, and Imuno-Rápido HBsAg®) and different biological specimens (serum, whole blood, and saliva) were evaluated. Analyses comprised a reference panel and samples from field studies targeting suspected cases of hepatitis B virus (HBV) (G I), individuals living in deprived areas (G II), and highly vulnerable individuals (G III). Enzyme immunoassay (EIA) was defined as the gold standard in this study. Reproducibility, repeatability, and cross-reactivity with other infectious agents such as dengue, immunodeficiency (HIV), and hepatitis C (HCV) viruses and T. pallidum were determined. RESULTS: For the reference panel, the sensitivity and specificity of all HBsAg RTs were higher than 93.00 %. G I presented the highest kappa values for all rapid assays using sera samples. When using serum, the sensitivity values were higher than 93.40 for G I, 60.00 % for G II and 66.77 % for G III, and the specificity values were higher than 99.50 for GI, 97.20 for G II and 99.10 % for G III for all tests. For whole blood samples & the Vikia® HBsAg assay, the best performance was achieved for GIII (k = 79.75 %). For saliva samples, the Imuno-Rápido HBsAg® assay showed the highest concordance values with EIA for G I (40.68 %) and G II (32.20 %). The reproducibility and repeatability of all RTs for serum and saliva were excellent, and the concordance between HBsAg EIAs and RTs using samples reactive with other infectious agents varied from 70.10 % to 100.00 %. CONCLUSIONS: The overall performance of RTs for HBsAg in serum was high/moderately high for all groups, thereby promoting increased access to HBV diagnosis among vulnerable populations as well as samples from individuals in emergency settings or remote areas. Rapid tests for HBsAg using whole blood could be used in prevalence studies, though these assays should not be used for saliva samples. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-015-1249-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4665901/ /pubmed/26619906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-1249-5 Text en © Cruz et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Cruz, Helena Medina Scalioni, Leticia de Paula de Paula, Vanessa Salete da Silva, Elisangela Ferreira do Ó, Kycia Maria Rodrigues Milagres, Flavio Augusto Pádua Cruz, Marcelo Santos Bastos, Francisco Inácio Pollo-Flores, Priscila Leal, Erotildes Motta-Castro, Ana Rita Coimbra Pilotto, José Henrique Lewis-Ximenez, Lia Laura Lampe, Elisabeth Villar, Livia Melo Evaluating HBsAg rapid test performance for different biological samples from low and high infection rate settings & populations |
title | Evaluating HBsAg rapid test performance for different biological samples from low and high infection rate settings & populations |
title_full | Evaluating HBsAg rapid test performance for different biological samples from low and high infection rate settings & populations |
title_fullStr | Evaluating HBsAg rapid test performance for different biological samples from low and high infection rate settings & populations |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating HBsAg rapid test performance for different biological samples from low and high infection rate settings & populations |
title_short | Evaluating HBsAg rapid test performance for different biological samples from low and high infection rate settings & populations |
title_sort | evaluating hbsag rapid test performance for different biological samples from low and high infection rate settings & populations |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4665901/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26619906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-1249-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cruzhelenamedina evaluatinghbsagrapidtestperformancefordifferentbiologicalsamplesfromlowandhighinfectionratesettingspopulations AT scalionileticiadepaula evaluatinghbsagrapidtestperformancefordifferentbiologicalsamplesfromlowandhighinfectionratesettingspopulations AT depaulavanessasalete evaluatinghbsagrapidtestperformancefordifferentbiologicalsamplesfromlowandhighinfectionratesettingspopulations AT dasilvaelisangelaferreira evaluatinghbsagrapidtestperformancefordifferentbiologicalsamplesfromlowandhighinfectionratesettingspopulations AT dookyciamariarodrigues evaluatinghbsagrapidtestperformancefordifferentbiologicalsamplesfromlowandhighinfectionratesettingspopulations AT milagresflavioaugustopadua evaluatinghbsagrapidtestperformancefordifferentbiologicalsamplesfromlowandhighinfectionratesettingspopulations AT cruzmarcelosantos evaluatinghbsagrapidtestperformancefordifferentbiologicalsamplesfromlowandhighinfectionratesettingspopulations AT bastosfranciscoinacio evaluatinghbsagrapidtestperformancefordifferentbiologicalsamplesfromlowandhighinfectionratesettingspopulations AT polloflorespriscila evaluatinghbsagrapidtestperformancefordifferentbiologicalsamplesfromlowandhighinfectionratesettingspopulations AT lealerotildes evaluatinghbsagrapidtestperformancefordifferentbiologicalsamplesfromlowandhighinfectionratesettingspopulations AT mottacastroanaritacoimbra evaluatinghbsagrapidtestperformancefordifferentbiologicalsamplesfromlowandhighinfectionratesettingspopulations AT pilottojosehenrique evaluatinghbsagrapidtestperformancefordifferentbiologicalsamplesfromlowandhighinfectionratesettingspopulations AT lewisximenezlialaura evaluatinghbsagrapidtestperformancefordifferentbiologicalsamplesfromlowandhighinfectionratesettingspopulations AT lampeelisabeth evaluatinghbsagrapidtestperformancefordifferentbiologicalsamplesfromlowandhighinfectionratesettingspopulations AT villarliviamelo evaluatinghbsagrapidtestperformancefordifferentbiologicalsamplesfromlowandhighinfectionratesettingspopulations |