Cargando…

Evaluating HBsAg rapid test performance for different biological samples from low and high infection rate settings & populations

BACKGROUND: Rapid tests (RTs) might have several advantages over standard laboratory procedures, increasing access to diagnosis, especially among vulnerable populations and/or those living in remote areas. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of RTs for the detection of hepatitis B...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cruz, Helena Medina, Scalioni, Leticia de Paula, de Paula, Vanessa Salete, da Silva, Elisangela Ferreira, do Ó, Kycia Maria Rodrigues, Milagres, Flavio Augusto Pádua, Cruz, Marcelo Santos, Bastos, Francisco Inácio, Pollo-Flores, Priscila, Leal, Erotildes, Motta-Castro, Ana Rita Coimbra, Pilotto, José Henrique, Lewis-Ximenez, Lia Laura, Lampe, Elisabeth, Villar, Livia Melo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4665901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26619906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-1249-5
_version_ 1782403634082873344
author Cruz, Helena Medina
Scalioni, Leticia de Paula
de Paula, Vanessa Salete
da Silva, Elisangela Ferreira
do Ó, Kycia Maria Rodrigues
Milagres, Flavio Augusto Pádua
Cruz, Marcelo Santos
Bastos, Francisco Inácio
Pollo-Flores, Priscila
Leal, Erotildes
Motta-Castro, Ana Rita Coimbra
Pilotto, José Henrique
Lewis-Ximenez, Lia Laura
Lampe, Elisabeth
Villar, Livia Melo
author_facet Cruz, Helena Medina
Scalioni, Leticia de Paula
de Paula, Vanessa Salete
da Silva, Elisangela Ferreira
do Ó, Kycia Maria Rodrigues
Milagres, Flavio Augusto Pádua
Cruz, Marcelo Santos
Bastos, Francisco Inácio
Pollo-Flores, Priscila
Leal, Erotildes
Motta-Castro, Ana Rita Coimbra
Pilotto, José Henrique
Lewis-Ximenez, Lia Laura
Lampe, Elisabeth
Villar, Livia Melo
author_sort Cruz, Helena Medina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rapid tests (RTs) might have several advantages over standard laboratory procedures, increasing access to diagnosis, especially among vulnerable populations and/or those living in remote areas. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of RTs for the detection of hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) in samples from different populations/settings. METHODS: Three RTs for HBsAg detection (Vikia® HBsAg, HBsAg Teste Rápido®, and Imuno-Rápido HBsAg®) and different biological specimens (serum, whole blood, and saliva) were evaluated. Analyses comprised a reference panel and samples from field studies targeting suspected cases of hepatitis B virus (HBV) (G I), individuals living in deprived areas (G II), and highly vulnerable individuals (G III). Enzyme immunoassay (EIA) was defined as the gold standard in this study. Reproducibility, repeatability, and cross-reactivity with other infectious agents such as dengue, immunodeficiency (HIV), and hepatitis C (HCV) viruses and T. pallidum were determined. RESULTS: For the reference panel, the sensitivity and specificity of all HBsAg RTs were higher than 93.00 %. G I presented the highest kappa values for all rapid assays using sera samples. When using serum, the sensitivity values were higher than 93.40 for G I, 60.00 % for G II and 66.77 % for G III, and the specificity values were higher than 99.50 for GI, 97.20 for G II and 99.10 % for G III for all tests. For whole blood samples & the Vikia® HBsAg assay, the best performance was achieved for GIII (k = 79.75 %). For saliva samples, the Imuno-Rápido HBsAg® assay showed the highest concordance values with EIA for G I (40.68 %) and G II (32.20 %). The reproducibility and repeatability of all RTs for serum and saliva were excellent, and the concordance between HBsAg EIAs and RTs using samples reactive with other infectious agents varied from 70.10 % to 100.00 %. CONCLUSIONS: The overall performance of RTs for HBsAg in serum was high/moderately high for all groups, thereby promoting increased access to HBV diagnosis among vulnerable populations as well as samples from individuals in emergency settings or remote areas. Rapid tests for HBsAg using whole blood could be used in prevalence studies, though these assays should not be used for saliva samples. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-015-1249-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4665901
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46659012015-12-02 Evaluating HBsAg rapid test performance for different biological samples from low and high infection rate settings & populations Cruz, Helena Medina Scalioni, Leticia de Paula de Paula, Vanessa Salete da Silva, Elisangela Ferreira do Ó, Kycia Maria Rodrigues Milagres, Flavio Augusto Pádua Cruz, Marcelo Santos Bastos, Francisco Inácio Pollo-Flores, Priscila Leal, Erotildes Motta-Castro, Ana Rita Coimbra Pilotto, José Henrique Lewis-Ximenez, Lia Laura Lampe, Elisabeth Villar, Livia Melo BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Rapid tests (RTs) might have several advantages over standard laboratory procedures, increasing access to diagnosis, especially among vulnerable populations and/or those living in remote areas. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of RTs for the detection of hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) in samples from different populations/settings. METHODS: Three RTs for HBsAg detection (Vikia® HBsAg, HBsAg Teste Rápido®, and Imuno-Rápido HBsAg®) and different biological specimens (serum, whole blood, and saliva) were evaluated. Analyses comprised a reference panel and samples from field studies targeting suspected cases of hepatitis B virus (HBV) (G I), individuals living in deprived areas (G II), and highly vulnerable individuals (G III). Enzyme immunoassay (EIA) was defined as the gold standard in this study. Reproducibility, repeatability, and cross-reactivity with other infectious agents such as dengue, immunodeficiency (HIV), and hepatitis C (HCV) viruses and T. pallidum were determined. RESULTS: For the reference panel, the sensitivity and specificity of all HBsAg RTs were higher than 93.00 %. G I presented the highest kappa values for all rapid assays using sera samples. When using serum, the sensitivity values were higher than 93.40 for G I, 60.00 % for G II and 66.77 % for G III, and the specificity values were higher than 99.50 for GI, 97.20 for G II and 99.10 % for G III for all tests. For whole blood samples & the Vikia® HBsAg assay, the best performance was achieved for GIII (k = 79.75 %). For saliva samples, the Imuno-Rápido HBsAg® assay showed the highest concordance values with EIA for G I (40.68 %) and G II (32.20 %). The reproducibility and repeatability of all RTs for serum and saliva were excellent, and the concordance between HBsAg EIAs and RTs using samples reactive with other infectious agents varied from 70.10 % to 100.00 %. CONCLUSIONS: The overall performance of RTs for HBsAg in serum was high/moderately high for all groups, thereby promoting increased access to HBV diagnosis among vulnerable populations as well as samples from individuals in emergency settings or remote areas. Rapid tests for HBsAg using whole blood could be used in prevalence studies, though these assays should not be used for saliva samples. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-015-1249-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4665901/ /pubmed/26619906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-1249-5 Text en © Cruz et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cruz, Helena Medina
Scalioni, Leticia de Paula
de Paula, Vanessa Salete
da Silva, Elisangela Ferreira
do Ó, Kycia Maria Rodrigues
Milagres, Flavio Augusto Pádua
Cruz, Marcelo Santos
Bastos, Francisco Inácio
Pollo-Flores, Priscila
Leal, Erotildes
Motta-Castro, Ana Rita Coimbra
Pilotto, José Henrique
Lewis-Ximenez, Lia Laura
Lampe, Elisabeth
Villar, Livia Melo
Evaluating HBsAg rapid test performance for different biological samples from low and high infection rate settings & populations
title Evaluating HBsAg rapid test performance for different biological samples from low and high infection rate settings & populations
title_full Evaluating HBsAg rapid test performance for different biological samples from low and high infection rate settings & populations
title_fullStr Evaluating HBsAg rapid test performance for different biological samples from low and high infection rate settings & populations
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating HBsAg rapid test performance for different biological samples from low and high infection rate settings & populations
title_short Evaluating HBsAg rapid test performance for different biological samples from low and high infection rate settings & populations
title_sort evaluating hbsag rapid test performance for different biological samples from low and high infection rate settings & populations
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4665901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26619906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-1249-5
work_keys_str_mv AT cruzhelenamedina evaluatinghbsagrapidtestperformancefordifferentbiologicalsamplesfromlowandhighinfectionratesettingspopulations
AT scalionileticiadepaula evaluatinghbsagrapidtestperformancefordifferentbiologicalsamplesfromlowandhighinfectionratesettingspopulations
AT depaulavanessasalete evaluatinghbsagrapidtestperformancefordifferentbiologicalsamplesfromlowandhighinfectionratesettingspopulations
AT dasilvaelisangelaferreira evaluatinghbsagrapidtestperformancefordifferentbiologicalsamplesfromlowandhighinfectionratesettingspopulations
AT dookyciamariarodrigues evaluatinghbsagrapidtestperformancefordifferentbiologicalsamplesfromlowandhighinfectionratesettingspopulations
AT milagresflavioaugustopadua evaluatinghbsagrapidtestperformancefordifferentbiologicalsamplesfromlowandhighinfectionratesettingspopulations
AT cruzmarcelosantos evaluatinghbsagrapidtestperformancefordifferentbiologicalsamplesfromlowandhighinfectionratesettingspopulations
AT bastosfranciscoinacio evaluatinghbsagrapidtestperformancefordifferentbiologicalsamplesfromlowandhighinfectionratesettingspopulations
AT polloflorespriscila evaluatinghbsagrapidtestperformancefordifferentbiologicalsamplesfromlowandhighinfectionratesettingspopulations
AT lealerotildes evaluatinghbsagrapidtestperformancefordifferentbiologicalsamplesfromlowandhighinfectionratesettingspopulations
AT mottacastroanaritacoimbra evaluatinghbsagrapidtestperformancefordifferentbiologicalsamplesfromlowandhighinfectionratesettingspopulations
AT pilottojosehenrique evaluatinghbsagrapidtestperformancefordifferentbiologicalsamplesfromlowandhighinfectionratesettingspopulations
AT lewisximenezlialaura evaluatinghbsagrapidtestperformancefordifferentbiologicalsamplesfromlowandhighinfectionratesettingspopulations
AT lampeelisabeth evaluatinghbsagrapidtestperformancefordifferentbiologicalsamplesfromlowandhighinfectionratesettingspopulations
AT villarliviamelo evaluatinghbsagrapidtestperformancefordifferentbiologicalsamplesfromlowandhighinfectionratesettingspopulations