Cargando…

Weaning from tracheostomy in subjects undergoing pulmonary rehabilitation

BACKGROUND: Weaning from tracheostomy has implications in management, quality of life, and costs of ventilated patients. Furthermore, endotracheal cannula removing needs further studies. Aim of this study was the validation of a protocol for weaning from tracheostomy and evaluation of predictor fact...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pasqua, Franco, Nardi, Ilaria, Provenzano, Alessia, Mari, Alessia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4666070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26629342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40248-015-0032-1
_version_ 1782403656011743232
author Pasqua, Franco
Nardi, Ilaria
Provenzano, Alessia
Mari, Alessia
author_facet Pasqua, Franco
Nardi, Ilaria
Provenzano, Alessia
Mari, Alessia
author_sort Pasqua, Franco
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Weaning from tracheostomy has implications in management, quality of life, and costs of ventilated patients. Furthermore, endotracheal cannula removing needs further studies. Aim of this study was the validation of a protocol for weaning from tracheostomy and evaluation of predictor factors of decannulation. METHODS: Medical records of 48 patients were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were decannulated in agreement with a decannulation protocol based on the evaluation of clinical stability, expiratory muscle strength, presence of tracheal stenosis/granulomas, deglutition function, partial pressure of CO(2), and PaO(2)/FiO2 ratio. These variables, together with underlying disease, blood gas analysis parameters, time elapsed with cannula, comordibity, Barthel index, and the condition of ventilation, were evaluated in a logistic model as predictors of decannulation. RESULTS: 63 % of patients were successfully decannulated in agreement with our protocol and no one needed to be re-cannulated. Three variables were significantly associated with the decannulation: no pulmonary underlying diseases (OR = 7.12; 95 % CI 1.2–42.2), no mechanical ventilation (OR = 9.55; 95 % CI 2.1–44.2) and period of tracheostomy ≤10 weeks (OR = 6.5; 95 % CI 1.6–27.5). CONCLUSIONS: The positive course of decannulated patients supports the suitability of the weaning protocol we propose here. The strong predictive role of three clinical variables gives premise for new studies testing simpler decannulation protocols.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4666070
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46660702015-12-02 Weaning from tracheostomy in subjects undergoing pulmonary rehabilitation Pasqua, Franco Nardi, Ilaria Provenzano, Alessia Mari, Alessia Multidiscip Respir Med Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Weaning from tracheostomy has implications in management, quality of life, and costs of ventilated patients. Furthermore, endotracheal cannula removing needs further studies. Aim of this study was the validation of a protocol for weaning from tracheostomy and evaluation of predictor factors of decannulation. METHODS: Medical records of 48 patients were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were decannulated in agreement with a decannulation protocol based on the evaluation of clinical stability, expiratory muscle strength, presence of tracheal stenosis/granulomas, deglutition function, partial pressure of CO(2), and PaO(2)/FiO2 ratio. These variables, together with underlying disease, blood gas analysis parameters, time elapsed with cannula, comordibity, Barthel index, and the condition of ventilation, were evaluated in a logistic model as predictors of decannulation. RESULTS: 63 % of patients were successfully decannulated in agreement with our protocol and no one needed to be re-cannulated. Three variables were significantly associated with the decannulation: no pulmonary underlying diseases (OR = 7.12; 95 % CI 1.2–42.2), no mechanical ventilation (OR = 9.55; 95 % CI 2.1–44.2) and period of tracheostomy ≤10 weeks (OR = 6.5; 95 % CI 1.6–27.5). CONCLUSIONS: The positive course of decannulated patients supports the suitability of the weaning protocol we propose here. The strong predictive role of three clinical variables gives premise for new studies testing simpler decannulation protocols. BioMed Central 2015-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4666070/ /pubmed/26629342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40248-015-0032-1 Text en © Pasqua et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Pasqua, Franco
Nardi, Ilaria
Provenzano, Alessia
Mari, Alessia
Weaning from tracheostomy in subjects undergoing pulmonary rehabilitation
title Weaning from tracheostomy in subjects undergoing pulmonary rehabilitation
title_full Weaning from tracheostomy in subjects undergoing pulmonary rehabilitation
title_fullStr Weaning from tracheostomy in subjects undergoing pulmonary rehabilitation
title_full_unstemmed Weaning from tracheostomy in subjects undergoing pulmonary rehabilitation
title_short Weaning from tracheostomy in subjects undergoing pulmonary rehabilitation
title_sort weaning from tracheostomy in subjects undergoing pulmonary rehabilitation
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4666070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26629342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40248-015-0032-1
work_keys_str_mv AT pasquafranco weaningfromtracheostomyinsubjectsundergoingpulmonaryrehabilitation
AT nardiilaria weaningfromtracheostomyinsubjectsundergoingpulmonaryrehabilitation
AT provenzanoalessia weaningfromtracheostomyinsubjectsundergoingpulmonaryrehabilitation
AT marialessia weaningfromtracheostomyinsubjectsundergoingpulmonaryrehabilitation
AT weaningfromtracheostomyinsubjectsundergoingpulmonaryrehabilitation