Cargando…

Differences in net global warming potential and greenhouse gas intensity between major rice-based cropping systems in China

Double rice (DR) and upland crop-single rice (UR) systems are the major rice-based cropping systems in China, yet differences in net global warming potential (NGWP) and greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI) between the two systems are poorly documented. Accordingly, a 3-year field experiment was conducted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiong, Zhengqin, Liu, Yinglie, Wu, Zhen, Zhang, Xiaolin, Liu, Pingli, Huang, Taiqing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4667221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26626733
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep17774
_version_ 1782403803782316032
author Xiong, Zhengqin
Liu, Yinglie
Wu, Zhen
Zhang, Xiaolin
Liu, Pingli
Huang, Taiqing
author_facet Xiong, Zhengqin
Liu, Yinglie
Wu, Zhen
Zhang, Xiaolin
Liu, Pingli
Huang, Taiqing
author_sort Xiong, Zhengqin
collection PubMed
description Double rice (DR) and upland crop-single rice (UR) systems are the major rice-based cropping systems in China, yet differences in net global warming potential (NGWP) and greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI) between the two systems are poorly documented. Accordingly, a 3-year field experiment was conducted to simultaneously measure methane (CH(4)) and nitrous oxide (N(2)O) emissions and changes in soil organic carbon (SOC) in oil rape-rice-rice and wheat-rice (representing DR and UR, respectively) systems with straw incorporation (0, 3 and 6 t/ha) during the rice-growing seasons. Compared with the UR system, the annual CH(4), N(2)O, grain yield and NGWP were significantly increased in the DR system, though little effect on SOC sequestration or GHGI was observed without straw incorporation. Straw incorporation increased CH(4) emission and SOC sequestration but had no significant effect on N(2)O emission in both systems. Averaged over the three study years, straw incorporation had no significant effect on NGWP and GHGI in the UR system, whereas these parameters were greatly increased in the DR system, i.e., by 108% (3 t/ha) and 180% (6 t/ha) for NGWP and 103% (3 t/ha) and 168% (6 t/ha) for GHGI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4667221
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46672212015-12-08 Differences in net global warming potential and greenhouse gas intensity between major rice-based cropping systems in China Xiong, Zhengqin Liu, Yinglie Wu, Zhen Zhang, Xiaolin Liu, Pingli Huang, Taiqing Sci Rep Article Double rice (DR) and upland crop-single rice (UR) systems are the major rice-based cropping systems in China, yet differences in net global warming potential (NGWP) and greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI) between the two systems are poorly documented. Accordingly, a 3-year field experiment was conducted to simultaneously measure methane (CH(4)) and nitrous oxide (N(2)O) emissions and changes in soil organic carbon (SOC) in oil rape-rice-rice and wheat-rice (representing DR and UR, respectively) systems with straw incorporation (0, 3 and 6 t/ha) during the rice-growing seasons. Compared with the UR system, the annual CH(4), N(2)O, grain yield and NGWP were significantly increased in the DR system, though little effect on SOC sequestration or GHGI was observed without straw incorporation. Straw incorporation increased CH(4) emission and SOC sequestration but had no significant effect on N(2)O emission in both systems. Averaged over the three study years, straw incorporation had no significant effect on NGWP and GHGI in the UR system, whereas these parameters were greatly increased in the DR system, i.e., by 108% (3 t/ha) and 180% (6 t/ha) for NGWP and 103% (3 t/ha) and 168% (6 t/ha) for GHGI. Nature Publishing Group 2015-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4667221/ /pubmed/26626733 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep17774 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Xiong, Zhengqin
Liu, Yinglie
Wu, Zhen
Zhang, Xiaolin
Liu, Pingli
Huang, Taiqing
Differences in net global warming potential and greenhouse gas intensity between major rice-based cropping systems in China
title Differences in net global warming potential and greenhouse gas intensity between major rice-based cropping systems in China
title_full Differences in net global warming potential and greenhouse gas intensity between major rice-based cropping systems in China
title_fullStr Differences in net global warming potential and greenhouse gas intensity between major rice-based cropping systems in China
title_full_unstemmed Differences in net global warming potential and greenhouse gas intensity between major rice-based cropping systems in China
title_short Differences in net global warming potential and greenhouse gas intensity between major rice-based cropping systems in China
title_sort differences in net global warming potential and greenhouse gas intensity between major rice-based cropping systems in china
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4667221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26626733
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep17774
work_keys_str_mv AT xiongzhengqin differencesinnetglobalwarmingpotentialandgreenhousegasintensitybetweenmajorricebasedcroppingsystemsinchina
AT liuyinglie differencesinnetglobalwarmingpotentialandgreenhousegasintensitybetweenmajorricebasedcroppingsystemsinchina
AT wuzhen differencesinnetglobalwarmingpotentialandgreenhousegasintensitybetweenmajorricebasedcroppingsystemsinchina
AT zhangxiaolin differencesinnetglobalwarmingpotentialandgreenhousegasintensitybetweenmajorricebasedcroppingsystemsinchina
AT liupingli differencesinnetglobalwarmingpotentialandgreenhousegasintensitybetweenmajorricebasedcroppingsystemsinchina
AT huangtaiqing differencesinnetglobalwarmingpotentialandgreenhousegasintensitybetweenmajorricebasedcroppingsystemsinchina