Cargando…
A Birth-cohort testing intervention identified hepatitis c virus infection among patients with few identified risks: a cross-sectional study
BACKGROUND: International guidelines and U.S. guidelines prior to 2012 only recommended testing for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection among patients at risk, but adherence to guidelines is poor, and the majority of those infected remain undiagnosed. A strategy to perform one-time testing of all pati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4667399/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26626449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-1283-3 |
_version_ | 1782403819977572352 |
---|---|
author | Southern, William N. Norton, Brianna Steinman, Meredith DeLuca, Joseph Drainoni, Mari-Lynn Smith, Bryce D. Litwin, Alain H. |
author_facet | Southern, William N. Norton, Brianna Steinman, Meredith DeLuca, Joseph Drainoni, Mari-Lynn Smith, Bryce D. Litwin, Alain H. |
author_sort | Southern, William N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: International guidelines and U.S. guidelines prior to 2012 only recommended testing for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection among patients at risk, but adherence to guidelines is poor, and the majority of those infected remain undiagnosed. A strategy to perform one-time testing of all patients born during 1945–1965, birth cohort testing, may diagnose HCV infection among patients whose risk remains unknown. We sought to determine if a birth-cohort testing intervention for HCV antibody positivity helped identify patients with fewer documented risk factors or medical indications than a pre-intervention, risk-based testing strategy. METHODS: We used a cross-sectional design with retrospective electronic medical record review to examine patients identified with HCV antibody positivity (Ab+) during a pre-intervention (risk-based) phase, the standard of care at the time, vs. a birth-cohort testing intervention phase. We compared demographic and clinical characteristics and HCV risk-associated factors among patients whose HCV Ab + was identified during the pre-intervention (risk-based testing) vs. post birth-cohort intervention phases. Study subjects were patients identified as HCV-Ab + in the baseline (risk-based) and birth-cohort testing phases of the Hepatitis C Assessment and Testing (HepCAT) Project. RESULTS: Compared to the risk-based phase, patients newly diagnosed with HCV Ab + after the birth-cohort intervention were significantly less likely to have a history of any substance abuse (30.5 % vs. 49.5 %, p = 0.02), elevated alanine transaminase levels of > 40 U/L (22.0 % vs. 46.7 %, p = 0.002), or the composite any risk-associated factor (55.9 % vs. 79.0 %, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Birth-cohort testing is an useful strategy for identifying previously undiagnosed HCV Ab + because it does not require providers ask risk-based questions, or patients to disclose risk behaviors, and appears to identify HCV Ab + in patients who would not have been identified using a risk-based testing strategy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4667399 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46673992015-12-03 A Birth-cohort testing intervention identified hepatitis c virus infection among patients with few identified risks: a cross-sectional study Southern, William N. Norton, Brianna Steinman, Meredith DeLuca, Joseph Drainoni, Mari-Lynn Smith, Bryce D. Litwin, Alain H. BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: International guidelines and U.S. guidelines prior to 2012 only recommended testing for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection among patients at risk, but adherence to guidelines is poor, and the majority of those infected remain undiagnosed. A strategy to perform one-time testing of all patients born during 1945–1965, birth cohort testing, may diagnose HCV infection among patients whose risk remains unknown. We sought to determine if a birth-cohort testing intervention for HCV antibody positivity helped identify patients with fewer documented risk factors or medical indications than a pre-intervention, risk-based testing strategy. METHODS: We used a cross-sectional design with retrospective electronic medical record review to examine patients identified with HCV antibody positivity (Ab+) during a pre-intervention (risk-based) phase, the standard of care at the time, vs. a birth-cohort testing intervention phase. We compared demographic and clinical characteristics and HCV risk-associated factors among patients whose HCV Ab + was identified during the pre-intervention (risk-based testing) vs. post birth-cohort intervention phases. Study subjects were patients identified as HCV-Ab + in the baseline (risk-based) and birth-cohort testing phases of the Hepatitis C Assessment and Testing (HepCAT) Project. RESULTS: Compared to the risk-based phase, patients newly diagnosed with HCV Ab + after the birth-cohort intervention were significantly less likely to have a history of any substance abuse (30.5 % vs. 49.5 %, p = 0.02), elevated alanine transaminase levels of > 40 U/L (22.0 % vs. 46.7 %, p = 0.002), or the composite any risk-associated factor (55.9 % vs. 79.0 %, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Birth-cohort testing is an useful strategy for identifying previously undiagnosed HCV Ab + because it does not require providers ask risk-based questions, or patients to disclose risk behaviors, and appears to identify HCV Ab + in patients who would not have been identified using a risk-based testing strategy. BioMed Central 2015-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4667399/ /pubmed/26626449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-1283-3 Text en © Southern et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Southern, William N. Norton, Brianna Steinman, Meredith DeLuca, Joseph Drainoni, Mari-Lynn Smith, Bryce D. Litwin, Alain H. A Birth-cohort testing intervention identified hepatitis c virus infection among patients with few identified risks: a cross-sectional study |
title | A Birth-cohort testing intervention identified hepatitis c virus infection among patients with few identified risks: a cross-sectional study |
title_full | A Birth-cohort testing intervention identified hepatitis c virus infection among patients with few identified risks: a cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | A Birth-cohort testing intervention identified hepatitis c virus infection among patients with few identified risks: a cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | A Birth-cohort testing intervention identified hepatitis c virus infection among patients with few identified risks: a cross-sectional study |
title_short | A Birth-cohort testing intervention identified hepatitis c virus infection among patients with few identified risks: a cross-sectional study |
title_sort | birth-cohort testing intervention identified hepatitis c virus infection among patients with few identified risks: a cross-sectional study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4667399/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26626449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-1283-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT southernwilliamn abirthcohorttestinginterventionidentifiedhepatitiscvirusinfectionamongpatientswithfewidentifiedrisksacrosssectionalstudy AT nortonbrianna abirthcohorttestinginterventionidentifiedhepatitiscvirusinfectionamongpatientswithfewidentifiedrisksacrosssectionalstudy AT steinmanmeredith abirthcohorttestinginterventionidentifiedhepatitiscvirusinfectionamongpatientswithfewidentifiedrisksacrosssectionalstudy AT delucajoseph abirthcohorttestinginterventionidentifiedhepatitiscvirusinfectionamongpatientswithfewidentifiedrisksacrosssectionalstudy AT drainonimarilynn abirthcohorttestinginterventionidentifiedhepatitiscvirusinfectionamongpatientswithfewidentifiedrisksacrosssectionalstudy AT smithbryced abirthcohorttestinginterventionidentifiedhepatitiscvirusinfectionamongpatientswithfewidentifiedrisksacrosssectionalstudy AT litwinalainh abirthcohorttestinginterventionidentifiedhepatitiscvirusinfectionamongpatientswithfewidentifiedrisksacrosssectionalstudy AT southernwilliamn birthcohorttestinginterventionidentifiedhepatitiscvirusinfectionamongpatientswithfewidentifiedrisksacrosssectionalstudy AT nortonbrianna birthcohorttestinginterventionidentifiedhepatitiscvirusinfectionamongpatientswithfewidentifiedrisksacrosssectionalstudy AT steinmanmeredith birthcohorttestinginterventionidentifiedhepatitiscvirusinfectionamongpatientswithfewidentifiedrisksacrosssectionalstudy AT delucajoseph birthcohorttestinginterventionidentifiedhepatitiscvirusinfectionamongpatientswithfewidentifiedrisksacrosssectionalstudy AT drainonimarilynn birthcohorttestinginterventionidentifiedhepatitiscvirusinfectionamongpatientswithfewidentifiedrisksacrosssectionalstudy AT smithbryced birthcohorttestinginterventionidentifiedhepatitiscvirusinfectionamongpatientswithfewidentifiedrisksacrosssectionalstudy AT litwinalainh birthcohorttestinginterventionidentifiedhepatitiscvirusinfectionamongpatientswithfewidentifiedrisksacrosssectionalstudy |