Cargando…

Anaesthetic injection versus ischemic compression for the pain relief of abdominal wall trigger points in women with chronic pelvic pain

BACKGROUND: Chronic pelvic pain is a common condition among women, and 10 to 30 % of causes originate from the abdominal wall, and are associated with trigger points. Although little is known about their pathophysiology, variable methods have been practiced clinically. The purpose of this study was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Montenegro, Mary L. L. S., Braz, Carolina A., Rosa-e-Silva, Julio C., Candido-dos-Reis, Francisco J., Nogueira, Antonio A., Poli-Neto, Omero B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4667406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26628263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-015-0155-0
_version_ 1782403821572456448
author Montenegro, Mary L. L. S.
Braz, Carolina A.
Rosa-e-Silva, Julio C.
Candido-dos-Reis, Francisco J.
Nogueira, Antonio A.
Poli-Neto, Omero B.
author_facet Montenegro, Mary L. L. S.
Braz, Carolina A.
Rosa-e-Silva, Julio C.
Candido-dos-Reis, Francisco J.
Nogueira, Antonio A.
Poli-Neto, Omero B.
author_sort Montenegro, Mary L. L. S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chronic pelvic pain is a common condition among women, and 10 to 30 % of causes originate from the abdominal wall, and are associated with trigger points. Although little is known about their pathophysiology, variable methods have been practiced clinically. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of local anaesthetic injections versus ischemic compression via physical therapy for pain relief of abdominal wall trigger points in women with chronic pelvic pain. METHODS: We conducted a parallel group randomized trial including 30 women with chronic pelvic pain with abdominal wall trigger points. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of two intervention groups. One group received an injection of 2 mL 0.5 % lidocaine without a vasoconstrictor into a trigger point. In the other group, ischemic compression via physical therapy was administered at the trigger points three times, with each session lasting for 60 s, and a rest period of 30 s between applications. Both treatments were administered during one weekly session for four weeks. Our primary outcomes were satisfactory clinical response rates and percentages of pain relief. Our secondary outcomes are pain threshold and tolerance at the trigger points. All subjects were evaluated at baseline and 1, 4, and 12 weeks after the interventions. The study was conducted at a tertiary hospital that was associated with a university providing assistance predominantly to working class women who were treated by the public health system. RESULTS: Clinical response rates and pain relief were significantly better at 1, 4, and 12 weeks for those receiving local anaesthetic injections than ischemic compression via physical therapy. The pain relief of women treated with local anaesthetic injections progressively improved at 1, 4, and 12 weeks after intervention. In contrast, women treated with ischemic compression did not show considerable changes in pain relief after intervention. In the local anaesthetic injection group, pain threshold and tolerance improved with time in the absence of significant differences between groups. CONCLUSION: Lidocaine injection seems to be better for reducing the severity of chronic pelvic pain secondary to abdominal wall trigger points compared to ischemic compression via physical therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00628355. Date of registration: February 25, 2008. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12871-015-0155-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4667406
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46674062015-12-03 Anaesthetic injection versus ischemic compression for the pain relief of abdominal wall trigger points in women with chronic pelvic pain Montenegro, Mary L. L. S. Braz, Carolina A. Rosa-e-Silva, Julio C. Candido-dos-Reis, Francisco J. Nogueira, Antonio A. Poli-Neto, Omero B. BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Chronic pelvic pain is a common condition among women, and 10 to 30 % of causes originate from the abdominal wall, and are associated with trigger points. Although little is known about their pathophysiology, variable methods have been practiced clinically. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of local anaesthetic injections versus ischemic compression via physical therapy for pain relief of abdominal wall trigger points in women with chronic pelvic pain. METHODS: We conducted a parallel group randomized trial including 30 women with chronic pelvic pain with abdominal wall trigger points. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of two intervention groups. One group received an injection of 2 mL 0.5 % lidocaine without a vasoconstrictor into a trigger point. In the other group, ischemic compression via physical therapy was administered at the trigger points three times, with each session lasting for 60 s, and a rest period of 30 s between applications. Both treatments were administered during one weekly session for four weeks. Our primary outcomes were satisfactory clinical response rates and percentages of pain relief. Our secondary outcomes are pain threshold and tolerance at the trigger points. All subjects were evaluated at baseline and 1, 4, and 12 weeks after the interventions. The study was conducted at a tertiary hospital that was associated with a university providing assistance predominantly to working class women who were treated by the public health system. RESULTS: Clinical response rates and pain relief were significantly better at 1, 4, and 12 weeks for those receiving local anaesthetic injections than ischemic compression via physical therapy. The pain relief of women treated with local anaesthetic injections progressively improved at 1, 4, and 12 weeks after intervention. In contrast, women treated with ischemic compression did not show considerable changes in pain relief after intervention. In the local anaesthetic injection group, pain threshold and tolerance improved with time in the absence of significant differences between groups. CONCLUSION: Lidocaine injection seems to be better for reducing the severity of chronic pelvic pain secondary to abdominal wall trigger points compared to ischemic compression via physical therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00628355. Date of registration: February 25, 2008. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12871-015-0155-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4667406/ /pubmed/26628263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-015-0155-0 Text en © Montenegro et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Montenegro, Mary L. L. S.
Braz, Carolina A.
Rosa-e-Silva, Julio C.
Candido-dos-Reis, Francisco J.
Nogueira, Antonio A.
Poli-Neto, Omero B.
Anaesthetic injection versus ischemic compression for the pain relief of abdominal wall trigger points in women with chronic pelvic pain
title Anaesthetic injection versus ischemic compression for the pain relief of abdominal wall trigger points in women with chronic pelvic pain
title_full Anaesthetic injection versus ischemic compression for the pain relief of abdominal wall trigger points in women with chronic pelvic pain
title_fullStr Anaesthetic injection versus ischemic compression for the pain relief of abdominal wall trigger points in women with chronic pelvic pain
title_full_unstemmed Anaesthetic injection versus ischemic compression for the pain relief of abdominal wall trigger points in women with chronic pelvic pain
title_short Anaesthetic injection versus ischemic compression for the pain relief of abdominal wall trigger points in women with chronic pelvic pain
title_sort anaesthetic injection versus ischemic compression for the pain relief of abdominal wall trigger points in women with chronic pelvic pain
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4667406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26628263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-015-0155-0
work_keys_str_mv AT montenegromarylls anaestheticinjectionversusischemiccompressionforthepainreliefofabdominalwalltriggerpointsinwomenwithchronicpelvicpain
AT brazcarolinaa anaestheticinjectionversusischemiccompressionforthepainreliefofabdominalwalltriggerpointsinwomenwithchronicpelvicpain
AT rosaesilvajulioc anaestheticinjectionversusischemiccompressionforthepainreliefofabdominalwalltriggerpointsinwomenwithchronicpelvicpain
AT candidodosreisfranciscoj anaestheticinjectionversusischemiccompressionforthepainreliefofabdominalwalltriggerpointsinwomenwithchronicpelvicpain
AT nogueiraantonioa anaestheticinjectionversusischemiccompressionforthepainreliefofabdominalwalltriggerpointsinwomenwithchronicpelvicpain
AT polinetoomerob anaestheticinjectionversusischemiccompressionforthepainreliefofabdominalwalltriggerpointsinwomenwithchronicpelvicpain