Cargando…
Is it ethical to prevent secondary use of stored biological samples and data derived from consenting research participants? The case of Malawi
BACKGROUND: This paper discusses the contentious issue of reuse of stored biological samples and data obtained from research participants in past clinical research to answer future ethical and scientifically valid research questions. Many countries have regulations and guidelines that guide the use...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4667408/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26626016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-015-0077-x |
_version_ | 1782403822031732736 |
---|---|
author | Mungwira, Randy G. Nyangulu, Wongani Misiri, James Iphani, Steven Ng’ong’ola, Ruby Chirambo, Chawanangwa M. Masiye, Francis Mfutso-Bengo, Joseph |
author_facet | Mungwira, Randy G. Nyangulu, Wongani Misiri, James Iphani, Steven Ng’ong’ola, Ruby Chirambo, Chawanangwa M. Masiye, Francis Mfutso-Bengo, Joseph |
author_sort | Mungwira, Randy G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This paper discusses the contentious issue of reuse of stored biological samples and data obtained from research participants in past clinical research to answer future ethical and scientifically valid research questions. Many countries have regulations and guidelines that guide the use and exportation of stored biological samples and data. However, there are variations in regulations and guidelines governing the reuse of stored biological samples and data in Sub-Saharan Africa including Malawi. DISCUSSION: The current research ethics regulations and guidelines in Malawi do not allow indefinite storage and reuse of biological samples and data for future unspecified research. This comes even though the country has managed to answer pertinent research questions using stored biological samples and data. We acknowledge the limited technical expertise and equipment unavailable in Malawi that necessitates exportation of biological samples and data and the genuine concern raised by the regulatory authorities about the possible exploitation of biological samples and data by researchers. We also acknowledge that Malawi does not have bio-banks for storing biological samples and data for future research purposes. This creates room for possible exploitation of biological samples and data collected from research participants in primary research projects in Malawi. However, research ethics committees require completion and approval of material transfer agreements and data transfer agreements for biological samples and data collected for research purposes respectively and this requirement may partly address the concern raised by the regulatory authorities. Our concern though is that there is no such requirement for biological samples and data collected from patients for clinical or diagnostic purposes. SUMMARY: In conclusion, we propose developing a medical data and material transfer agreement for biological samples and data collected from patients for clinical or diagnostic purposes in both public and private health facilities that may end up in research centers outside Malawi. We also propose revision of the current research ethics regulations and guidelines in Malawi in order to allow secondary use of biological samples and data collected from primary research projects as a way of maximizing the use of collected samples and data. Finally, we call for consultation of all stakeholders within the Malawi research community when regulatory authorities are developing policies that govern research in Malawi. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4667408 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46674082015-12-03 Is it ethical to prevent secondary use of stored biological samples and data derived from consenting research participants? The case of Malawi Mungwira, Randy G. Nyangulu, Wongani Misiri, James Iphani, Steven Ng’ong’ola, Ruby Chirambo, Chawanangwa M. Masiye, Francis Mfutso-Bengo, Joseph BMC Med Ethics Debate BACKGROUND: This paper discusses the contentious issue of reuse of stored biological samples and data obtained from research participants in past clinical research to answer future ethical and scientifically valid research questions. Many countries have regulations and guidelines that guide the use and exportation of stored biological samples and data. However, there are variations in regulations and guidelines governing the reuse of stored biological samples and data in Sub-Saharan Africa including Malawi. DISCUSSION: The current research ethics regulations and guidelines in Malawi do not allow indefinite storage and reuse of biological samples and data for future unspecified research. This comes even though the country has managed to answer pertinent research questions using stored biological samples and data. We acknowledge the limited technical expertise and equipment unavailable in Malawi that necessitates exportation of biological samples and data and the genuine concern raised by the regulatory authorities about the possible exploitation of biological samples and data by researchers. We also acknowledge that Malawi does not have bio-banks for storing biological samples and data for future research purposes. This creates room for possible exploitation of biological samples and data collected from research participants in primary research projects in Malawi. However, research ethics committees require completion and approval of material transfer agreements and data transfer agreements for biological samples and data collected for research purposes respectively and this requirement may partly address the concern raised by the regulatory authorities. Our concern though is that there is no such requirement for biological samples and data collected from patients for clinical or diagnostic purposes. SUMMARY: In conclusion, we propose developing a medical data and material transfer agreement for biological samples and data collected from patients for clinical or diagnostic purposes in both public and private health facilities that may end up in research centers outside Malawi. We also propose revision of the current research ethics regulations and guidelines in Malawi in order to allow secondary use of biological samples and data collected from primary research projects as a way of maximizing the use of collected samples and data. Finally, we call for consultation of all stakeholders within the Malawi research community when regulatory authorities are developing policies that govern research in Malawi. BioMed Central 2015-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4667408/ /pubmed/26626016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-015-0077-x Text en © Mungwira et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Debate Mungwira, Randy G. Nyangulu, Wongani Misiri, James Iphani, Steven Ng’ong’ola, Ruby Chirambo, Chawanangwa M. Masiye, Francis Mfutso-Bengo, Joseph Is it ethical to prevent secondary use of stored biological samples and data derived from consenting research participants? The case of Malawi |
title | Is it ethical to prevent secondary use of stored biological samples and data derived from consenting research participants? The case of Malawi |
title_full | Is it ethical to prevent secondary use of stored biological samples and data derived from consenting research participants? The case of Malawi |
title_fullStr | Is it ethical to prevent secondary use of stored biological samples and data derived from consenting research participants? The case of Malawi |
title_full_unstemmed | Is it ethical to prevent secondary use of stored biological samples and data derived from consenting research participants? The case of Malawi |
title_short | Is it ethical to prevent secondary use of stored biological samples and data derived from consenting research participants? The case of Malawi |
title_sort | is it ethical to prevent secondary use of stored biological samples and data derived from consenting research participants? the case of malawi |
topic | Debate |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4667408/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26626016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-015-0077-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mungwirarandyg isitethicaltopreventsecondaryuseofstoredbiologicalsamplesanddataderivedfromconsentingresearchparticipantsthecaseofmalawi AT nyanguluwongani isitethicaltopreventsecondaryuseofstoredbiologicalsamplesanddataderivedfromconsentingresearchparticipantsthecaseofmalawi AT misirijames isitethicaltopreventsecondaryuseofstoredbiologicalsamplesanddataderivedfromconsentingresearchparticipantsthecaseofmalawi AT iphanisteven isitethicaltopreventsecondaryuseofstoredbiologicalsamplesanddataderivedfromconsentingresearchparticipantsthecaseofmalawi AT ngongolaruby isitethicaltopreventsecondaryuseofstoredbiologicalsamplesanddataderivedfromconsentingresearchparticipantsthecaseofmalawi AT chirambochawanangwam isitethicaltopreventsecondaryuseofstoredbiologicalsamplesanddataderivedfromconsentingresearchparticipantsthecaseofmalawi AT masiyefrancis isitethicaltopreventsecondaryuseofstoredbiologicalsamplesanddataderivedfromconsentingresearchparticipantsthecaseofmalawi AT mfutsobengojoseph isitethicaltopreventsecondaryuseofstoredbiologicalsamplesanddataderivedfromconsentingresearchparticipantsthecaseofmalawi |