Cargando…

Is it ethical to prevent secondary use of stored biological samples and data derived from consenting research participants? The case of Malawi

BACKGROUND: This paper discusses the contentious issue of reuse of stored biological samples and data obtained from research participants in past clinical research to answer future ethical and scientifically valid research questions. Many countries have regulations and guidelines that guide the use...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mungwira, Randy G., Nyangulu, Wongani, Misiri, James, Iphani, Steven, Ng’ong’ola, Ruby, Chirambo, Chawanangwa M., Masiye, Francis, Mfutso-Bengo, Joseph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4667408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26626016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-015-0077-x
_version_ 1782403822031732736
author Mungwira, Randy G.
Nyangulu, Wongani
Misiri, James
Iphani, Steven
Ng’ong’ola, Ruby
Chirambo, Chawanangwa M.
Masiye, Francis
Mfutso-Bengo, Joseph
author_facet Mungwira, Randy G.
Nyangulu, Wongani
Misiri, James
Iphani, Steven
Ng’ong’ola, Ruby
Chirambo, Chawanangwa M.
Masiye, Francis
Mfutso-Bengo, Joseph
author_sort Mungwira, Randy G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This paper discusses the contentious issue of reuse of stored biological samples and data obtained from research participants in past clinical research to answer future ethical and scientifically valid research questions. Many countries have regulations and guidelines that guide the use and exportation of stored biological samples and data. However, there are variations in regulations and guidelines governing the reuse of stored biological samples and data in Sub-Saharan Africa including Malawi. DISCUSSION: The current research ethics regulations and guidelines in Malawi do not allow indefinite storage and reuse of biological samples and data for future unspecified research. This comes even though the country has managed to answer pertinent research questions using stored biological samples and data. We acknowledge the limited technical expertise and equipment unavailable in Malawi that necessitates exportation of biological samples and data and the genuine concern raised by the regulatory authorities about the possible exploitation of biological samples and data by researchers. We also acknowledge that Malawi does not have bio-banks for storing biological samples and data for future research purposes. This creates room for possible exploitation of biological samples and data collected from research participants in primary research projects in Malawi. However, research ethics committees require completion and approval of material transfer agreements and data transfer agreements for biological samples and data collected for research purposes respectively and this requirement may partly address the concern raised by the regulatory authorities. Our concern though is that there is no such requirement for biological samples and data collected from patients for clinical or diagnostic purposes. SUMMARY: In conclusion, we propose developing a medical data and material transfer agreement for biological samples and data collected from patients for clinical or diagnostic purposes in both public and private health facilities that may end up in research centers outside Malawi. We also propose revision of the current research ethics regulations and guidelines in Malawi in order to allow secondary use of biological samples and data collected from primary research projects as a way of maximizing the use of collected samples and data. Finally, we call for consultation of all stakeholders within the Malawi research community when regulatory authorities are developing policies that govern research in Malawi.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4667408
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46674082015-12-03 Is it ethical to prevent secondary use of stored biological samples and data derived from consenting research participants? The case of Malawi Mungwira, Randy G. Nyangulu, Wongani Misiri, James Iphani, Steven Ng’ong’ola, Ruby Chirambo, Chawanangwa M. Masiye, Francis Mfutso-Bengo, Joseph BMC Med Ethics Debate BACKGROUND: This paper discusses the contentious issue of reuse of stored biological samples and data obtained from research participants in past clinical research to answer future ethical and scientifically valid research questions. Many countries have regulations and guidelines that guide the use and exportation of stored biological samples and data. However, there are variations in regulations and guidelines governing the reuse of stored biological samples and data in Sub-Saharan Africa including Malawi. DISCUSSION: The current research ethics regulations and guidelines in Malawi do not allow indefinite storage and reuse of biological samples and data for future unspecified research. This comes even though the country has managed to answer pertinent research questions using stored biological samples and data. We acknowledge the limited technical expertise and equipment unavailable in Malawi that necessitates exportation of biological samples and data and the genuine concern raised by the regulatory authorities about the possible exploitation of biological samples and data by researchers. We also acknowledge that Malawi does not have bio-banks for storing biological samples and data for future research purposes. This creates room for possible exploitation of biological samples and data collected from research participants in primary research projects in Malawi. However, research ethics committees require completion and approval of material transfer agreements and data transfer agreements for biological samples and data collected for research purposes respectively and this requirement may partly address the concern raised by the regulatory authorities. Our concern though is that there is no such requirement for biological samples and data collected from patients for clinical or diagnostic purposes. SUMMARY: In conclusion, we propose developing a medical data and material transfer agreement for biological samples and data collected from patients for clinical or diagnostic purposes in both public and private health facilities that may end up in research centers outside Malawi. We also propose revision of the current research ethics regulations and guidelines in Malawi in order to allow secondary use of biological samples and data collected from primary research projects as a way of maximizing the use of collected samples and data. Finally, we call for consultation of all stakeholders within the Malawi research community when regulatory authorities are developing policies that govern research in Malawi. BioMed Central 2015-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4667408/ /pubmed/26626016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-015-0077-x Text en © Mungwira et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Debate
Mungwira, Randy G.
Nyangulu, Wongani
Misiri, James
Iphani, Steven
Ng’ong’ola, Ruby
Chirambo, Chawanangwa M.
Masiye, Francis
Mfutso-Bengo, Joseph
Is it ethical to prevent secondary use of stored biological samples and data derived from consenting research participants? The case of Malawi
title Is it ethical to prevent secondary use of stored biological samples and data derived from consenting research participants? The case of Malawi
title_full Is it ethical to prevent secondary use of stored biological samples and data derived from consenting research participants? The case of Malawi
title_fullStr Is it ethical to prevent secondary use of stored biological samples and data derived from consenting research participants? The case of Malawi
title_full_unstemmed Is it ethical to prevent secondary use of stored biological samples and data derived from consenting research participants? The case of Malawi
title_short Is it ethical to prevent secondary use of stored biological samples and data derived from consenting research participants? The case of Malawi
title_sort is it ethical to prevent secondary use of stored biological samples and data derived from consenting research participants? the case of malawi
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4667408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26626016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-015-0077-x
work_keys_str_mv AT mungwirarandyg isitethicaltopreventsecondaryuseofstoredbiologicalsamplesanddataderivedfromconsentingresearchparticipantsthecaseofmalawi
AT nyanguluwongani isitethicaltopreventsecondaryuseofstoredbiologicalsamplesanddataderivedfromconsentingresearchparticipantsthecaseofmalawi
AT misirijames isitethicaltopreventsecondaryuseofstoredbiologicalsamplesanddataderivedfromconsentingresearchparticipantsthecaseofmalawi
AT iphanisteven isitethicaltopreventsecondaryuseofstoredbiologicalsamplesanddataderivedfromconsentingresearchparticipantsthecaseofmalawi
AT ngongolaruby isitethicaltopreventsecondaryuseofstoredbiologicalsamplesanddataderivedfromconsentingresearchparticipantsthecaseofmalawi
AT chirambochawanangwam isitethicaltopreventsecondaryuseofstoredbiologicalsamplesanddataderivedfromconsentingresearchparticipantsthecaseofmalawi
AT masiyefrancis isitethicaltopreventsecondaryuseofstoredbiologicalsamplesanddataderivedfromconsentingresearchparticipantsthecaseofmalawi
AT mfutsobengojoseph isitethicaltopreventsecondaryuseofstoredbiologicalsamplesanddataderivedfromconsentingresearchparticipantsthecaseofmalawi