Cargando…

Treatment of nausea in pregnancy: a cross-sectional multinational web-based study of pregnant women and new mothers

BACKGROUND: The factors related to the treatment of nausea during pregnancy have not yet been investigated in several countries simultaneously. The present study aimed to describe differences in self-reported nausea during pregnancy and the patterns of use for both conventional and herbal medicines...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heitmann, Kristine, Holst, Lone, Lupattelli, Angela, Maltepe, Caroline, Nordeng, Hedvig
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4667480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26628289
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0746-2
_version_ 1782403837326262272
author Heitmann, Kristine
Holst, Lone
Lupattelli, Angela
Maltepe, Caroline
Nordeng, Hedvig
author_facet Heitmann, Kristine
Holst, Lone
Lupattelli, Angela
Maltepe, Caroline
Nordeng, Hedvig
author_sort Heitmann, Kristine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The factors related to the treatment of nausea during pregnancy have not yet been investigated in several countries simultaneously. The present study aimed to describe differences in self-reported nausea during pregnancy and the patterns of use for both conventional and herbal medicines across countries. The factors related to nausea and its treatment and the relationships between different self-reported co-morbidities and nausea were also investigated. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used data collected by a web-based questionnaire distributed between October 2011 and February 2012 in several countries within five regions: Western, Northern, and Eastern Europe, North America, and Australia. Women who were pregnant or had a child less than one year old were eligible to participate. RESULTS: A total of 9113 women were included in the study, whereof 6701 (73.5 %) had experienced nausea during pregnancy. Among respondents with nausea, conventional medicines were used by 1201 (17.9 %) women and herbal medicines by 556 (8.3 %) women. The extent of self-reported nausea and its treatment varied by country. Education, working status, and folic acid use were significantly associated with the use of conventional medicines against nausea. Respondents who had nausea also had a high burden of co-morbidity. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of nausea was high across all participating countries but its treatment varied, possibly due to cultural differences and differences in attitudes towards medicines. A high degree of co-morbidity was found among respondents with nausea. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-015-0746-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4667480
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46674802015-12-03 Treatment of nausea in pregnancy: a cross-sectional multinational web-based study of pregnant women and new mothers Heitmann, Kristine Holst, Lone Lupattelli, Angela Maltepe, Caroline Nordeng, Hedvig BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: The factors related to the treatment of nausea during pregnancy have not yet been investigated in several countries simultaneously. The present study aimed to describe differences in self-reported nausea during pregnancy and the patterns of use for both conventional and herbal medicines across countries. The factors related to nausea and its treatment and the relationships between different self-reported co-morbidities and nausea were also investigated. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used data collected by a web-based questionnaire distributed between October 2011 and February 2012 in several countries within five regions: Western, Northern, and Eastern Europe, North America, and Australia. Women who were pregnant or had a child less than one year old were eligible to participate. RESULTS: A total of 9113 women were included in the study, whereof 6701 (73.5 %) had experienced nausea during pregnancy. Among respondents with nausea, conventional medicines were used by 1201 (17.9 %) women and herbal medicines by 556 (8.3 %) women. The extent of self-reported nausea and its treatment varied by country. Education, working status, and folic acid use were significantly associated with the use of conventional medicines against nausea. Respondents who had nausea also had a high burden of co-morbidity. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of nausea was high across all participating countries but its treatment varied, possibly due to cultural differences and differences in attitudes towards medicines. A high degree of co-morbidity was found among respondents with nausea. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-015-0746-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4667480/ /pubmed/26628289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0746-2 Text en © Heitmann et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Heitmann, Kristine
Holst, Lone
Lupattelli, Angela
Maltepe, Caroline
Nordeng, Hedvig
Treatment of nausea in pregnancy: a cross-sectional multinational web-based study of pregnant women and new mothers
title Treatment of nausea in pregnancy: a cross-sectional multinational web-based study of pregnant women and new mothers
title_full Treatment of nausea in pregnancy: a cross-sectional multinational web-based study of pregnant women and new mothers
title_fullStr Treatment of nausea in pregnancy: a cross-sectional multinational web-based study of pregnant women and new mothers
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of nausea in pregnancy: a cross-sectional multinational web-based study of pregnant women and new mothers
title_short Treatment of nausea in pregnancy: a cross-sectional multinational web-based study of pregnant women and new mothers
title_sort treatment of nausea in pregnancy: a cross-sectional multinational web-based study of pregnant women and new mothers
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4667480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26628289
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0746-2
work_keys_str_mv AT heitmannkristine treatmentofnauseainpregnancyacrosssectionalmultinationalwebbasedstudyofpregnantwomenandnewmothers
AT holstlone treatmentofnauseainpregnancyacrosssectionalmultinationalwebbasedstudyofpregnantwomenandnewmothers
AT lupattelliangela treatmentofnauseainpregnancyacrosssectionalmultinationalwebbasedstudyofpregnantwomenandnewmothers
AT maltepecaroline treatmentofnauseainpregnancyacrosssectionalmultinationalwebbasedstudyofpregnantwomenandnewmothers
AT nordenghedvig treatmentofnauseainpregnancyacrosssectionalmultinationalwebbasedstudyofpregnantwomenandnewmothers