Cargando…

Accuracy of intracranial pressure monitoring: systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: Intracranial pressure (ICP) measurement is used to tailor interventions and to assist in formulating the prognosis for traumatic brain injury patients. Accurate data are therefore essential. The aim of this study was to verify the accuracy of ICP monitoring systems on the basis of a li...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zacchetti, Lucia, Magnoni, Sandra, Di Corte, Federica, Zanier, Elisa R., Stocchetti, Nino
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4667503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26627204
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-1137-9
_version_ 1782403842095185920
author Zacchetti, Lucia
Magnoni, Sandra
Di Corte, Federica
Zanier, Elisa R.
Stocchetti, Nino
author_facet Zacchetti, Lucia
Magnoni, Sandra
Di Corte, Federica
Zanier, Elisa R.
Stocchetti, Nino
author_sort Zacchetti, Lucia
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Intracranial pressure (ICP) measurement is used to tailor interventions and to assist in formulating the prognosis for traumatic brain injury patients. Accurate data are therefore essential. The aim of this study was to verify the accuracy of ICP monitoring systems on the basis of a literature review. METHODS: A PubMed search was conducted from 1982 to 2014, plus additional references from the selected papers. Accuracy was defined as the degree of correspondence between the pressure read by the catheter and a reference “real” ICP measurement. Studies comparing simultaneous readings from at least two catheters were included. Drift was defined as the loss of accuracy over the monitoring period. Meta-analyses of data from the studies were used to estimate the overall mean difference between simultaneous ICP measurements and their variability. Individual studies were weighted using both a fixed and a random effects model. RESULTS: Of 163 articles screened, 83 compared two intracranial catheters: 64 reported accuracy and 37 drift (some reported both). Of these, 10 and 17, respectively, fulfilled the inclusion criteria for accuracy and zero drift analysis. The combined mean differences between probes were 1.5 mmHg (95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.7–2.3) with the random effects model and 1.6 mmHg (95 % CI 1.3–1.9) with the fixed effects model. The reported mean drift over a long observation period was 0.75 mmHg. No relation was found with the duration of monitoring or differences between various probes. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that the average error between ICP measures is clinically negligible. The random effects model, however, indicates that a high percentage of readings may vary over a wide range, with clinical implications both for future comparison studies and for daily care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4667503
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46675032015-12-03 Accuracy of intracranial pressure monitoring: systematic review and meta-analysis Zacchetti, Lucia Magnoni, Sandra Di Corte, Federica Zanier, Elisa R. Stocchetti, Nino Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Intracranial pressure (ICP) measurement is used to tailor interventions and to assist in formulating the prognosis for traumatic brain injury patients. Accurate data are therefore essential. The aim of this study was to verify the accuracy of ICP monitoring systems on the basis of a literature review. METHODS: A PubMed search was conducted from 1982 to 2014, plus additional references from the selected papers. Accuracy was defined as the degree of correspondence between the pressure read by the catheter and a reference “real” ICP measurement. Studies comparing simultaneous readings from at least two catheters were included. Drift was defined as the loss of accuracy over the monitoring period. Meta-analyses of data from the studies were used to estimate the overall mean difference between simultaneous ICP measurements and their variability. Individual studies were weighted using both a fixed and a random effects model. RESULTS: Of 163 articles screened, 83 compared two intracranial catheters: 64 reported accuracy and 37 drift (some reported both). Of these, 10 and 17, respectively, fulfilled the inclusion criteria for accuracy and zero drift analysis. The combined mean differences between probes were 1.5 mmHg (95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.7–2.3) with the random effects model and 1.6 mmHg (95 % CI 1.3–1.9) with the fixed effects model. The reported mean drift over a long observation period was 0.75 mmHg. No relation was found with the duration of monitoring or differences between various probes. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that the average error between ICP measures is clinically negligible. The random effects model, however, indicates that a high percentage of readings may vary over a wide range, with clinical implications both for future comparison studies and for daily care. BioMed Central 2015-12-02 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4667503/ /pubmed/26627204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-1137-9 Text en © Zacchetti et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Zacchetti, Lucia
Magnoni, Sandra
Di Corte, Federica
Zanier, Elisa R.
Stocchetti, Nino
Accuracy of intracranial pressure monitoring: systematic review and meta-analysis
title Accuracy of intracranial pressure monitoring: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Accuracy of intracranial pressure monitoring: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Accuracy of intracranial pressure monitoring: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of intracranial pressure monitoring: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Accuracy of intracranial pressure monitoring: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort accuracy of intracranial pressure monitoring: systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4667503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26627204
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-1137-9
work_keys_str_mv AT zacchettilucia accuracyofintracranialpressuremonitoringsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT magnonisandra accuracyofintracranialpressuremonitoringsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dicortefederica accuracyofintracranialpressuremonitoringsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zanierelisar accuracyofintracranialpressuremonitoringsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT stocchettinino accuracyofintracranialpressuremonitoringsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis