Cargando…

Robotic pilot study for analysing spasticity: clinical data versus healthy controls

BACKGROUND: Spasticity is a motor disorder that causes significant disability and impairs function. There are no definitive parameters that assess spasticity and there is no universally accepted definition. Spasticity evaluation is important in determining stages of recovery. It can determine treatm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seth, Nitin, Johnson, Denise, Taylor, Graham W., Allen, O. Brian, Abdullah, Hussein A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4667530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26625718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-015-0103-8
_version_ 1782403848312193024
author Seth, Nitin
Johnson, Denise
Taylor, Graham W.
Allen, O. Brian
Abdullah, Hussein A.
author_facet Seth, Nitin
Johnson, Denise
Taylor, Graham W.
Allen, O. Brian
Abdullah, Hussein A.
author_sort Seth, Nitin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Spasticity is a motor disorder that causes significant disability and impairs function. There are no definitive parameters that assess spasticity and there is no universally accepted definition. Spasticity evaluation is important in determining stages of recovery. It can determine treatment effectiveness as well as how treatment should proceed. This paper presents a novel cross sectional robotic pilot study for the primary purpose of assessment. The system collects force and position data to quantify spasticity through similar motions of the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) assessment in the Sagittal plane. Validity of the system is determined based on its ability to measure velocity dependent resistance. METHODS: Forty individuals with Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) and 45 healthy individuals participated in a robotic pilot study. A linear regression model was applied to determine the effect an ABI has on force data obtained through the robotic system in an effort to validate it. Parameters from the model were compared for both groups. Two techniques were performed in an attempt to classify between healthy and patients. Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) with k-nearest neighbour (KNN) classification is compared to a time-series algorithm using position and force data in a linear discriminant analysis (LDA). RESULTS: The system is capable of detecting a velocity dependent resistance (p<0.05). Differences were found between healthy individuals and those with MAS 0 who are considered to be healthy. DTW with KNN is shown to improve classification between healthy and patients by approximately 20 % compared to that of an LDA. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative methods of spasticity evaluation demonstrate that differences can be observed between healthy individuals and those with MAS of 0 who are often clinically considered to be healthy. Exploiting the time-series nature of the collected data demonstrates that position and force together are an accurate predictor of patient health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4667530
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46675302015-12-03 Robotic pilot study for analysing spasticity: clinical data versus healthy controls Seth, Nitin Johnson, Denise Taylor, Graham W. Allen, O. Brian Abdullah, Hussein A. J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: Spasticity is a motor disorder that causes significant disability and impairs function. There are no definitive parameters that assess spasticity and there is no universally accepted definition. Spasticity evaluation is important in determining stages of recovery. It can determine treatment effectiveness as well as how treatment should proceed. This paper presents a novel cross sectional robotic pilot study for the primary purpose of assessment. The system collects force and position data to quantify spasticity through similar motions of the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) assessment in the Sagittal plane. Validity of the system is determined based on its ability to measure velocity dependent resistance. METHODS: Forty individuals with Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) and 45 healthy individuals participated in a robotic pilot study. A linear regression model was applied to determine the effect an ABI has on force data obtained through the robotic system in an effort to validate it. Parameters from the model were compared for both groups. Two techniques were performed in an attempt to classify between healthy and patients. Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) with k-nearest neighbour (KNN) classification is compared to a time-series algorithm using position and force data in a linear discriminant analysis (LDA). RESULTS: The system is capable of detecting a velocity dependent resistance (p<0.05). Differences were found between healthy individuals and those with MAS 0 who are considered to be healthy. DTW with KNN is shown to improve classification between healthy and patients by approximately 20 % compared to that of an LDA. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative methods of spasticity evaluation demonstrate that differences can be observed between healthy individuals and those with MAS of 0 who are often clinically considered to be healthy. Exploiting the time-series nature of the collected data demonstrates that position and force together are an accurate predictor of patient health. BioMed Central 2015-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4667530/ /pubmed/26625718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-015-0103-8 Text en © Seth et al. 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Seth, Nitin
Johnson, Denise
Taylor, Graham W.
Allen, O. Brian
Abdullah, Hussein A.
Robotic pilot study for analysing spasticity: clinical data versus healthy controls
title Robotic pilot study for analysing spasticity: clinical data versus healthy controls
title_full Robotic pilot study for analysing spasticity: clinical data versus healthy controls
title_fullStr Robotic pilot study for analysing spasticity: clinical data versus healthy controls
title_full_unstemmed Robotic pilot study for analysing spasticity: clinical data versus healthy controls
title_short Robotic pilot study for analysing spasticity: clinical data versus healthy controls
title_sort robotic pilot study for analysing spasticity: clinical data versus healthy controls
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4667530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26625718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-015-0103-8
work_keys_str_mv AT sethnitin roboticpilotstudyforanalysingspasticityclinicaldataversushealthycontrols
AT johnsondenise roboticpilotstudyforanalysingspasticityclinicaldataversushealthycontrols
AT taylorgrahamw roboticpilotstudyforanalysingspasticityclinicaldataversushealthycontrols
AT allenobrian roboticpilotstudyforanalysingspasticityclinicaldataversushealthycontrols
AT abdullahhusseina roboticpilotstudyforanalysingspasticityclinicaldataversushealthycontrols