Cargando…

Safety of human papillomavirus vaccines: a review

Introduction: Between 2006 and 2009, two different human papillomavirus virus (HPV) vaccines were licensed for use: a quadrivalent (qHPVv) and a bivalent (bHPVv) vaccine. Since 2008, HPV vaccination programmes have been implemented in the majority of the industrialized countries. Since 2013, HPV vac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stillo, Michela, Carrillo Santisteve, Paloma, Lopalco, Pier Luigi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Informa Healthcare 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4667712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25689872
http://dx.doi.org/10.1517/14740338.2015.1013532
_version_ 1782403880510816256
author Stillo, Michela
Carrillo Santisteve, Paloma
Lopalco, Pier Luigi
author_facet Stillo, Michela
Carrillo Santisteve, Paloma
Lopalco, Pier Luigi
author_sort Stillo, Michela
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Between 2006 and 2009, two different human papillomavirus virus (HPV) vaccines were licensed for use: a quadrivalent (qHPVv) and a bivalent (bHPVv) vaccine. Since 2008, HPV vaccination programmes have been implemented in the majority of the industrialized countries. Since 2013, HPV vaccination has been part of the national programs of 66 countries including almost all countries in North America and Western Europe. Despite all the efforts made by individual countries, coverage rates are lower than expected. Vaccine safety represents one of the main concerns associated with the lack of acceptance of HPV vaccination both in the European Union/European Economic Area and elsewhere. Areas covered: Safety data published on bivalent and quadrivalent HPV vaccines, both in pre-licensure and post-licensure phase, are reviewed. Expert opinion: Based on the latest scientific evidence, both HPV vaccines seem to be safe. Nevertheless, public concern and rumors about adverse events (AE) represent an important barrier to overcome in order to increase vaccine coverage. Passive surveillance of AEs is an important tool for detecting safety signals, but it should be complemented by activities aimed at assessing the real cause of all suspect AEs. Improved vaccine safety surveillance is the first step for effective communication based on scientific evidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4667712
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Informa Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46677122015-12-15 Safety of human papillomavirus vaccines: a review Stillo, Michela Carrillo Santisteve, Paloma Lopalco, Pier Luigi Expert Opin Drug Saf Review Introduction: Between 2006 and 2009, two different human papillomavirus virus (HPV) vaccines were licensed for use: a quadrivalent (qHPVv) and a bivalent (bHPVv) vaccine. Since 2008, HPV vaccination programmes have been implemented in the majority of the industrialized countries. Since 2013, HPV vaccination has been part of the national programs of 66 countries including almost all countries in North America and Western Europe. Despite all the efforts made by individual countries, coverage rates are lower than expected. Vaccine safety represents one of the main concerns associated with the lack of acceptance of HPV vaccination both in the European Union/European Economic Area and elsewhere. Areas covered: Safety data published on bivalent and quadrivalent HPV vaccines, both in pre-licensure and post-licensure phase, are reviewed. Expert opinion: Based on the latest scientific evidence, both HPV vaccines seem to be safe. Nevertheless, public concern and rumors about adverse events (AE) represent an important barrier to overcome in order to increase vaccine coverage. Passive surveillance of AEs is an important tool for detecting safety signals, but it should be complemented by activities aimed at assessing the real cause of all suspect AEs. Improved vaccine safety surveillance is the first step for effective communication based on scientific evidence. Informa Healthcare 2015-05-04 2015-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4667712/ /pubmed/25689872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1517/14740338.2015.1013532 Text en © Informa UK, Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
spellingShingle Review
Stillo, Michela
Carrillo Santisteve, Paloma
Lopalco, Pier Luigi
Safety of human papillomavirus vaccines: a review
title Safety of human papillomavirus vaccines: a review
title_full Safety of human papillomavirus vaccines: a review
title_fullStr Safety of human papillomavirus vaccines: a review
title_full_unstemmed Safety of human papillomavirus vaccines: a review
title_short Safety of human papillomavirus vaccines: a review
title_sort safety of human papillomavirus vaccines: a review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4667712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25689872
http://dx.doi.org/10.1517/14740338.2015.1013532
work_keys_str_mv AT stillomichela safetyofhumanpapillomavirusvaccinesareview
AT carrillosantistevepaloma safetyofhumanpapillomavirusvaccinesareview
AT lopalcopierluigi safetyofhumanpapillomavirusvaccinesareview