Cargando…

The Use and Abuse of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Modulate Corticospinal Excitability in Humans

The magnitude and direction of reported physiological effects induced using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to modulate human motor cortical excitability have proven difficult to replicate routinely. We conducted an online survey on the prevalence and possible causes of these reproducibility...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Héroux, Martin E., Taylor, Janet L., Gandevia, Simon C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4668054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26629998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144151
_version_ 1782403924055031808
author Héroux, Martin E.
Taylor, Janet L.
Gandevia, Simon C.
author_facet Héroux, Martin E.
Taylor, Janet L.
Gandevia, Simon C.
author_sort Héroux, Martin E.
collection PubMed
description The magnitude and direction of reported physiological effects induced using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to modulate human motor cortical excitability have proven difficult to replicate routinely. We conducted an online survey on the prevalence and possible causes of these reproducibility issues. A total of 153 researchers were identified via their publications and invited to complete an anonymous internet-based survey that asked about their experience trying to reproduce published findings for various TMS protocols. The prevalence of questionable research practices known to contribute to low reproducibility was also determined. We received 47 completed surveys from researchers with an average of 16.4 published papers (95% CI 10.8–22.0) that used TMS to modulate motor cortical excitability. Respondents also had a mean of 4.0 (2.5–5.7) relevant completed studies that would never be published. Across a range of TMS protocols, 45–60% of respondents found similar results to those in the original publications; the other respondents were able to reproduce the original effects only sometimes or not at all. Only 20% of respondents used formal power calculations to determine study sample sizes. Others relied on previously published studies (25%), personal experience (24%) or flexible post-hoc criteria (41%). Approximately 44% of respondents knew researchers who engaged in questionable research practices (range 32–70%), yet only 18% admitted to engaging in them (range 6–38%). These practices included screening subjects to find those that respond in a desired way to a TMS protocol, selectively reporting results and rejecting data based on a gut feeling. In a sample of 56 published papers that were inspected, not a single questionable research practice was reported. Our survey revealed that approximately 50% of researchers are unable to reproduce published TMS effects. Researchers need to start increasing study sample size and eliminating—or at least reporting—questionable research practices in order to make the outcomes of TMS research reproducible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4668054
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46680542015-12-10 The Use and Abuse of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Modulate Corticospinal Excitability in Humans Héroux, Martin E. Taylor, Janet L. Gandevia, Simon C. PLoS One Research Article The magnitude and direction of reported physiological effects induced using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to modulate human motor cortical excitability have proven difficult to replicate routinely. We conducted an online survey on the prevalence and possible causes of these reproducibility issues. A total of 153 researchers were identified via their publications and invited to complete an anonymous internet-based survey that asked about their experience trying to reproduce published findings for various TMS protocols. The prevalence of questionable research practices known to contribute to low reproducibility was also determined. We received 47 completed surveys from researchers with an average of 16.4 published papers (95% CI 10.8–22.0) that used TMS to modulate motor cortical excitability. Respondents also had a mean of 4.0 (2.5–5.7) relevant completed studies that would never be published. Across a range of TMS protocols, 45–60% of respondents found similar results to those in the original publications; the other respondents were able to reproduce the original effects only sometimes or not at all. Only 20% of respondents used formal power calculations to determine study sample sizes. Others relied on previously published studies (25%), personal experience (24%) or flexible post-hoc criteria (41%). Approximately 44% of respondents knew researchers who engaged in questionable research practices (range 32–70%), yet only 18% admitted to engaging in them (range 6–38%). These practices included screening subjects to find those that respond in a desired way to a TMS protocol, selectively reporting results and rejecting data based on a gut feeling. In a sample of 56 published papers that were inspected, not a single questionable research practice was reported. Our survey revealed that approximately 50% of researchers are unable to reproduce published TMS effects. Researchers need to start increasing study sample size and eliminating—or at least reporting—questionable research practices in order to make the outcomes of TMS research reproducible. Public Library of Science 2015-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4668054/ /pubmed/26629998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144151 Text en © 2015 Héroux et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Héroux, Martin E.
Taylor, Janet L.
Gandevia, Simon C.
The Use and Abuse of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Modulate Corticospinal Excitability in Humans
title The Use and Abuse of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Modulate Corticospinal Excitability in Humans
title_full The Use and Abuse of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Modulate Corticospinal Excitability in Humans
title_fullStr The Use and Abuse of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Modulate Corticospinal Excitability in Humans
title_full_unstemmed The Use and Abuse of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Modulate Corticospinal Excitability in Humans
title_short The Use and Abuse of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Modulate Corticospinal Excitability in Humans
title_sort use and abuse of transcranial magnetic stimulation to modulate corticospinal excitability in humans
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4668054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26629998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144151
work_keys_str_mv AT herouxmartine theuseandabuseoftranscranialmagneticstimulationtomodulatecorticospinalexcitabilityinhumans
AT taylorjanetl theuseandabuseoftranscranialmagneticstimulationtomodulatecorticospinalexcitabilityinhumans
AT gandeviasimonc theuseandabuseoftranscranialmagneticstimulationtomodulatecorticospinalexcitabilityinhumans
AT herouxmartine useandabuseoftranscranialmagneticstimulationtomodulatecorticospinalexcitabilityinhumans
AT taylorjanetl useandabuseoftranscranialmagneticstimulationtomodulatecorticospinalexcitabilityinhumans
AT gandeviasimonc useandabuseoftranscranialmagneticstimulationtomodulatecorticospinalexcitabilityinhumans