Cargando…

Oocyte Scoring Enhances Embryo-Scoring in Predicting Pregnancy Chances with IVF Where It Counts Most

CONTEXT: Our center’s quality improvement optimization process on many occasions anecdotally suggested that oocyte assessments might enhance embryo assessment in predicting pregnancy chances with in vitro fertilization (IVF). OBJECTIVE: To prospectively compare a morphologic oocyte grading system to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lazzaroni-Tealdi, Emanuela, Barad, David H., Albertini, David F., Yu, Yao, Kushnir, Vitaly A., Russell, Helena, Wu, Yan-Guang, Gleicher, Norbert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4668065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26630267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143632
_version_ 1782403926617751552
author Lazzaroni-Tealdi, Emanuela
Barad, David H.
Albertini, David F.
Yu, Yao
Kushnir, Vitaly A.
Russell, Helena
Wu, Yan-Guang
Gleicher, Norbert
author_facet Lazzaroni-Tealdi, Emanuela
Barad, David H.
Albertini, David F.
Yu, Yao
Kushnir, Vitaly A.
Russell, Helena
Wu, Yan-Guang
Gleicher, Norbert
author_sort Lazzaroni-Tealdi, Emanuela
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Our center’s quality improvement optimization process on many occasions anecdotally suggested that oocyte assessments might enhance embryo assessment in predicting pregnancy chances with in vitro fertilization (IVF). OBJECTIVE: To prospectively compare a morphologic oocyte grading system to standard day-3 morphologic embryo assessment. DESIGN, SETTING, PATIENTS: We prospectively investigated in a private academically-affiliated infertility center 94 consecutive IVF cycles based on 6 criteria for oocyte quality: morphology, cytoplasm, perivitelline space (PVS), zona pellucida (ZP), polar body (PB) and oocyte size, each assigned a value of -1 (worst), 0 (average) or +1 (best), so establishing an average total oocyte score (TOS). Embryo assessment utilized grade and cell numbers of each embryo on day-3 after oocyte retrieval. Clinical pregnancy was defined by presence of at least one intrauterine gestational sac. INTERVENTIONS: Standard IVF cycles in infertile women. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Predictability of pregnancy based on oocyte and embryo-grading systems. RESULTS: Average age for all patients was 36.5 ± 7.3 years; mean oocyte yield was 7.97± 5.76; Patient specific total oocyte score (PTOS) was -1.05 ± 2.24. PTOS, adjusted for patient age, was directly related to odds of increased embryo cell numbers (OR 1.12, P = 0.025), embryo grade (OR 1.19, P < 0.001) and clinical pregnancy [OR 1.58 (95%CI 1.23 to 2.02), P < 0.001]. Restricting the analysis to day three embryos of high quality (8-cell/ good grades), TOS was still predictive of clinical pregnancy (OR 2.08 (95%CI 1.26 to 3.44, P = 0.004). Among the 69 patients with embryos of Grade 4 or better available for transfer 23 achieved Clinical Pregnancy. When the analysis was restricted to the 69 transfers with good quality embryos (≥ Grade 4) the Oocyte Scoring System (TOS) (AUC±SE 0.863±0.044, oocyte score) provided significantly greater predictive value for clinical pregnancy compared to the embryo grade alone (AUC 0.646 ± 0.072, embryo grade) p = 0.015. CONCLUSIONS: Oocyte-scoring, thus, provides useful clinical information especially in good prognosis patients with large numbers of high quality embryos. This finding appears of particular importance at a time when many IVF centers are committing sizable investments to closed incubation systems with time-lapse photography, which are exclusively meant to define embryo morphology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4668065
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46680652015-12-10 Oocyte Scoring Enhances Embryo-Scoring in Predicting Pregnancy Chances with IVF Where It Counts Most Lazzaroni-Tealdi, Emanuela Barad, David H. Albertini, David F. Yu, Yao Kushnir, Vitaly A. Russell, Helena Wu, Yan-Guang Gleicher, Norbert PLoS One Research Article CONTEXT: Our center’s quality improvement optimization process on many occasions anecdotally suggested that oocyte assessments might enhance embryo assessment in predicting pregnancy chances with in vitro fertilization (IVF). OBJECTIVE: To prospectively compare a morphologic oocyte grading system to standard day-3 morphologic embryo assessment. DESIGN, SETTING, PATIENTS: We prospectively investigated in a private academically-affiliated infertility center 94 consecutive IVF cycles based on 6 criteria for oocyte quality: morphology, cytoplasm, perivitelline space (PVS), zona pellucida (ZP), polar body (PB) and oocyte size, each assigned a value of -1 (worst), 0 (average) or +1 (best), so establishing an average total oocyte score (TOS). Embryo assessment utilized grade and cell numbers of each embryo on day-3 after oocyte retrieval. Clinical pregnancy was defined by presence of at least one intrauterine gestational sac. INTERVENTIONS: Standard IVF cycles in infertile women. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Predictability of pregnancy based on oocyte and embryo-grading systems. RESULTS: Average age for all patients was 36.5 ± 7.3 years; mean oocyte yield was 7.97± 5.76; Patient specific total oocyte score (PTOS) was -1.05 ± 2.24. PTOS, adjusted for patient age, was directly related to odds of increased embryo cell numbers (OR 1.12, P = 0.025), embryo grade (OR 1.19, P < 0.001) and clinical pregnancy [OR 1.58 (95%CI 1.23 to 2.02), P < 0.001]. Restricting the analysis to day three embryos of high quality (8-cell/ good grades), TOS was still predictive of clinical pregnancy (OR 2.08 (95%CI 1.26 to 3.44, P = 0.004). Among the 69 patients with embryos of Grade 4 or better available for transfer 23 achieved Clinical Pregnancy. When the analysis was restricted to the 69 transfers with good quality embryos (≥ Grade 4) the Oocyte Scoring System (TOS) (AUC±SE 0.863±0.044, oocyte score) provided significantly greater predictive value for clinical pregnancy compared to the embryo grade alone (AUC 0.646 ± 0.072, embryo grade) p = 0.015. CONCLUSIONS: Oocyte-scoring, thus, provides useful clinical information especially in good prognosis patients with large numbers of high quality embryos. This finding appears of particular importance at a time when many IVF centers are committing sizable investments to closed incubation systems with time-lapse photography, which are exclusively meant to define embryo morphology. Public Library of Science 2015-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4668065/ /pubmed/26630267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143632 Text en © 2015 Lazzaroni-Tealdi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lazzaroni-Tealdi, Emanuela
Barad, David H.
Albertini, David F.
Yu, Yao
Kushnir, Vitaly A.
Russell, Helena
Wu, Yan-Guang
Gleicher, Norbert
Oocyte Scoring Enhances Embryo-Scoring in Predicting Pregnancy Chances with IVF Where It Counts Most
title Oocyte Scoring Enhances Embryo-Scoring in Predicting Pregnancy Chances with IVF Where It Counts Most
title_full Oocyte Scoring Enhances Embryo-Scoring in Predicting Pregnancy Chances with IVF Where It Counts Most
title_fullStr Oocyte Scoring Enhances Embryo-Scoring in Predicting Pregnancy Chances with IVF Where It Counts Most
title_full_unstemmed Oocyte Scoring Enhances Embryo-Scoring in Predicting Pregnancy Chances with IVF Where It Counts Most
title_short Oocyte Scoring Enhances Embryo-Scoring in Predicting Pregnancy Chances with IVF Where It Counts Most
title_sort oocyte scoring enhances embryo-scoring in predicting pregnancy chances with ivf where it counts most
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4668065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26630267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143632
work_keys_str_mv AT lazzaronitealdiemanuela oocytescoringenhancesembryoscoringinpredictingpregnancychanceswithivfwhereitcountsmost
AT baraddavidh oocytescoringenhancesembryoscoringinpredictingpregnancychanceswithivfwhereitcountsmost
AT albertinidavidf oocytescoringenhancesembryoscoringinpredictingpregnancychanceswithivfwhereitcountsmost
AT yuyao oocytescoringenhancesembryoscoringinpredictingpregnancychanceswithivfwhereitcountsmost
AT kushnirvitalya oocytescoringenhancesembryoscoringinpredictingpregnancychanceswithivfwhereitcountsmost
AT russellhelena oocytescoringenhancesembryoscoringinpredictingpregnancychanceswithivfwhereitcountsmost
AT wuyanguang oocytescoringenhancesembryoscoringinpredictingpregnancychanceswithivfwhereitcountsmost
AT gleichernorbert oocytescoringenhancesembryoscoringinpredictingpregnancychanceswithivfwhereitcountsmost