Cargando…

Deriving Multiple Benefits from Carbon Market-Based Savanna Fire Management: An Australian Example

Carbon markets afford potentially useful opportunities for supporting socially and environmentally sustainable land management programs but, to date, have been little applied in globally significant fire-prone savanna settings. While fire is intrinsic to regulating the composition, structure and dyn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Russell-Smith, Jeremy, Yates, Cameron P., Edwards, Andrew C., Whitehead, Peter J., Murphy, Brett P., Lawes, Michael J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4668068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26630453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143426
_version_ 1782403927080173568
author Russell-Smith, Jeremy
Yates, Cameron P.
Edwards, Andrew C.
Whitehead, Peter J.
Murphy, Brett P.
Lawes, Michael J.
author_facet Russell-Smith, Jeremy
Yates, Cameron P.
Edwards, Andrew C.
Whitehead, Peter J.
Murphy, Brett P.
Lawes, Michael J.
author_sort Russell-Smith, Jeremy
collection PubMed
description Carbon markets afford potentially useful opportunities for supporting socially and environmentally sustainable land management programs but, to date, have been little applied in globally significant fire-prone savanna settings. While fire is intrinsic to regulating the composition, structure and dynamics of savanna systems, in north Australian savannas frequent and extensive late dry season wildfires incur significant environmental, production and social impacts. Here we assess the potential of market-based savanna burning greenhouse gas emissions abatement and allied carbon biosequestration projects to deliver compatible environmental and broader socio-economic benefits in a highly biodiverse north Australian setting. Drawing on extensive regional ecological knowledge of fire regime effects on fire-vulnerable taxa and communities, we compare three fire regime metrics (seasonal fire frequency, proportion of long-unburnt vegetation, fire patch-size distribution) over a 15-year period for three national parks with an indigenously (Aboriginal) owned and managed market-based emissions abatement enterprise. Our assessment indicates improved fire management outcomes under the emissions abatement program, and mostly little change or declining outcomes on the parks. We attribute improved outcomes and putative biodiversity benefits under the abatement program to enhanced strategic management made possible by the market-based mitigation arrangement. For these same sites we estimate quanta of carbon credits that could be delivered under realistic enhanced fire management practice, using currently available and developing accredited Australian savanna burning accounting methods. We conclude that, in appropriate situations, market-based savanna burning activities can provide transformative climate change mitigation, ecosystem health, and community benefits in northern Australia, and, despite significant challenges, potentially in other fire-prone savanna settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4668068
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46680682015-12-10 Deriving Multiple Benefits from Carbon Market-Based Savanna Fire Management: An Australian Example Russell-Smith, Jeremy Yates, Cameron P. Edwards, Andrew C. Whitehead, Peter J. Murphy, Brett P. Lawes, Michael J. PLoS One Research Article Carbon markets afford potentially useful opportunities for supporting socially and environmentally sustainable land management programs but, to date, have been little applied in globally significant fire-prone savanna settings. While fire is intrinsic to regulating the composition, structure and dynamics of savanna systems, in north Australian savannas frequent and extensive late dry season wildfires incur significant environmental, production and social impacts. Here we assess the potential of market-based savanna burning greenhouse gas emissions abatement and allied carbon biosequestration projects to deliver compatible environmental and broader socio-economic benefits in a highly biodiverse north Australian setting. Drawing on extensive regional ecological knowledge of fire regime effects on fire-vulnerable taxa and communities, we compare three fire regime metrics (seasonal fire frequency, proportion of long-unburnt vegetation, fire patch-size distribution) over a 15-year period for three national parks with an indigenously (Aboriginal) owned and managed market-based emissions abatement enterprise. Our assessment indicates improved fire management outcomes under the emissions abatement program, and mostly little change or declining outcomes on the parks. We attribute improved outcomes and putative biodiversity benefits under the abatement program to enhanced strategic management made possible by the market-based mitigation arrangement. For these same sites we estimate quanta of carbon credits that could be delivered under realistic enhanced fire management practice, using currently available and developing accredited Australian savanna burning accounting methods. We conclude that, in appropriate situations, market-based savanna burning activities can provide transformative climate change mitigation, ecosystem health, and community benefits in northern Australia, and, despite significant challenges, potentially in other fire-prone savanna settings. Public Library of Science 2015-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4668068/ /pubmed/26630453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143426 Text en © 2015 Russell-Smith et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Russell-Smith, Jeremy
Yates, Cameron P.
Edwards, Andrew C.
Whitehead, Peter J.
Murphy, Brett P.
Lawes, Michael J.
Deriving Multiple Benefits from Carbon Market-Based Savanna Fire Management: An Australian Example
title Deriving Multiple Benefits from Carbon Market-Based Savanna Fire Management: An Australian Example
title_full Deriving Multiple Benefits from Carbon Market-Based Savanna Fire Management: An Australian Example
title_fullStr Deriving Multiple Benefits from Carbon Market-Based Savanna Fire Management: An Australian Example
title_full_unstemmed Deriving Multiple Benefits from Carbon Market-Based Savanna Fire Management: An Australian Example
title_short Deriving Multiple Benefits from Carbon Market-Based Savanna Fire Management: An Australian Example
title_sort deriving multiple benefits from carbon market-based savanna fire management: an australian example
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4668068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26630453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143426
work_keys_str_mv AT russellsmithjeremy derivingmultiplebenefitsfromcarbonmarketbasedsavannafiremanagementanaustralianexample
AT yatescameronp derivingmultiplebenefitsfromcarbonmarketbasedsavannafiremanagementanaustralianexample
AT edwardsandrewc derivingmultiplebenefitsfromcarbonmarketbasedsavannafiremanagementanaustralianexample
AT whiteheadpeterj derivingmultiplebenefitsfromcarbonmarketbasedsavannafiremanagementanaustralianexample
AT murphybrettp derivingmultiplebenefitsfromcarbonmarketbasedsavannafiremanagementanaustralianexample
AT lawesmichaelj derivingmultiplebenefitsfromcarbonmarketbasedsavannafiremanagementanaustralianexample