Cargando…
Shortfalls in the global protected area network at representing marine biodiversity
The first international goal for establishing marine protected areas (MPAs) to conserve the ocean’s biodiversity was set in 2002. Since 2006, the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) has driven MPA establishment, with 193 parties committed to protecting >10% of marine environments globally by...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4668359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26631984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep17539 |
_version_ | 1782403976817278976 |
---|---|
author | Klein, Carissa J. Brown, Christopher J. Halpern, Benjamin S. Segan, Daniel B. McGowan, Jennifer Beger, Maria Watson, James E.M. |
author_facet | Klein, Carissa J. Brown, Christopher J. Halpern, Benjamin S. Segan, Daniel B. McGowan, Jennifer Beger, Maria Watson, James E.M. |
author_sort | Klein, Carissa J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The first international goal for establishing marine protected areas (MPAs) to conserve the ocean’s biodiversity was set in 2002. Since 2006, the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) has driven MPA establishment, with 193 parties committed to protecting >10% of marine environments globally by 2020, especially ‘areas of particular importance for biodiversity’ (Aichi target 11). This has resulted in nearly 10 million km(2) of new MPAs, a growth of ~360% in a decade. Unlike on land, it is not known how well protected areas capture marine biodiversity, leaving a significant gap in our understanding of existing MPAs and future protection requirements. We assess the overlap of global MPAs with the ranges of 17,348 marine species (fishes, mammals, invertebrates), and find that 97.4% of species have <10% of their ranges represented in stricter conservation classes. Almost all (99.8%) of the very poorly represented species (<2% coverage) are found within exclusive economic zones, suggesting an important role for particular nations to better protect biodiversity. Our results offer strategic guidance on where MPAs should be placed to support the CBD’s overall goal to avert biodiversity loss. Achieving this goal is imperative for nature and humanity, as people depend on biodiversity for important and valuable services. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4668359 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46683592015-12-09 Shortfalls in the global protected area network at representing marine biodiversity Klein, Carissa J. Brown, Christopher J. Halpern, Benjamin S. Segan, Daniel B. McGowan, Jennifer Beger, Maria Watson, James E.M. Sci Rep Article The first international goal for establishing marine protected areas (MPAs) to conserve the ocean’s biodiversity was set in 2002. Since 2006, the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) has driven MPA establishment, with 193 parties committed to protecting >10% of marine environments globally by 2020, especially ‘areas of particular importance for biodiversity’ (Aichi target 11). This has resulted in nearly 10 million km(2) of new MPAs, a growth of ~360% in a decade. Unlike on land, it is not known how well protected areas capture marine biodiversity, leaving a significant gap in our understanding of existing MPAs and future protection requirements. We assess the overlap of global MPAs with the ranges of 17,348 marine species (fishes, mammals, invertebrates), and find that 97.4% of species have <10% of their ranges represented in stricter conservation classes. Almost all (99.8%) of the very poorly represented species (<2% coverage) are found within exclusive economic zones, suggesting an important role for particular nations to better protect biodiversity. Our results offer strategic guidance on where MPAs should be placed to support the CBD’s overall goal to avert biodiversity loss. Achieving this goal is imperative for nature and humanity, as people depend on biodiversity for important and valuable services. Nature Publishing Group 2015-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4668359/ /pubmed/26631984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep17539 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Klein, Carissa J. Brown, Christopher J. Halpern, Benjamin S. Segan, Daniel B. McGowan, Jennifer Beger, Maria Watson, James E.M. Shortfalls in the global protected area network at representing marine biodiversity |
title | Shortfalls in the global protected area network at representing marine biodiversity |
title_full | Shortfalls in the global protected area network at representing marine biodiversity |
title_fullStr | Shortfalls in the global protected area network at representing marine biodiversity |
title_full_unstemmed | Shortfalls in the global protected area network at representing marine biodiversity |
title_short | Shortfalls in the global protected area network at representing marine biodiversity |
title_sort | shortfalls in the global protected area network at representing marine biodiversity |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4668359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26631984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep17539 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kleincarissaj shortfallsintheglobalprotectedareanetworkatrepresentingmarinebiodiversity AT brownchristopherj shortfallsintheglobalprotectedareanetworkatrepresentingmarinebiodiversity AT halpernbenjamins shortfallsintheglobalprotectedareanetworkatrepresentingmarinebiodiversity AT segandanielb shortfallsintheglobalprotectedareanetworkatrepresentingmarinebiodiversity AT mcgowanjennifer shortfallsintheglobalprotectedareanetworkatrepresentingmarinebiodiversity AT begermaria shortfallsintheglobalprotectedareanetworkatrepresentingmarinebiodiversity AT watsonjamesem shortfallsintheglobalprotectedareanetworkatrepresentingmarinebiodiversity |