Cargando…

Shortfalls in the global protected area network at representing marine biodiversity

The first international goal for establishing marine protected areas (MPAs) to conserve the ocean’s biodiversity was set in 2002. Since 2006, the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) has driven MPA establishment, with 193 parties committed to protecting >10% of marine environments globally by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klein, Carissa J., Brown, Christopher J., Halpern, Benjamin S., Segan, Daniel B., McGowan, Jennifer, Beger, Maria, Watson, James E.M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4668359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26631984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep17539
_version_ 1782403976817278976
author Klein, Carissa J.
Brown, Christopher J.
Halpern, Benjamin S.
Segan, Daniel B.
McGowan, Jennifer
Beger, Maria
Watson, James E.M.
author_facet Klein, Carissa J.
Brown, Christopher J.
Halpern, Benjamin S.
Segan, Daniel B.
McGowan, Jennifer
Beger, Maria
Watson, James E.M.
author_sort Klein, Carissa J.
collection PubMed
description The first international goal for establishing marine protected areas (MPAs) to conserve the ocean’s biodiversity was set in 2002. Since 2006, the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) has driven MPA establishment, with 193 parties committed to protecting >10% of marine environments globally by 2020, especially ‘areas of particular importance for biodiversity’ (Aichi target 11). This has resulted in nearly 10 million km(2) of new MPAs, a growth of ~360% in a decade. Unlike on land, it is not known how well protected areas capture marine biodiversity, leaving a significant gap in our understanding of existing MPAs and future protection requirements. We assess the overlap of global MPAs with the ranges of 17,348 marine species (fishes, mammals, invertebrates), and find that 97.4% of species have <10% of their ranges represented in stricter conservation classes. Almost all (99.8%) of the very poorly represented species (<2% coverage) are found within exclusive economic zones, suggesting an important role for particular nations to better protect biodiversity. Our results offer strategic guidance on where MPAs should be placed to support the CBD’s overall goal to avert biodiversity loss. Achieving this goal is imperative for nature and humanity, as people depend on biodiversity for important and valuable services.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4668359
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46683592015-12-09 Shortfalls in the global protected area network at representing marine biodiversity Klein, Carissa J. Brown, Christopher J. Halpern, Benjamin S. Segan, Daniel B. McGowan, Jennifer Beger, Maria Watson, James E.M. Sci Rep Article The first international goal for establishing marine protected areas (MPAs) to conserve the ocean’s biodiversity was set in 2002. Since 2006, the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) has driven MPA establishment, with 193 parties committed to protecting >10% of marine environments globally by 2020, especially ‘areas of particular importance for biodiversity’ (Aichi target 11). This has resulted in nearly 10 million km(2) of new MPAs, a growth of ~360% in a decade. Unlike on land, it is not known how well protected areas capture marine biodiversity, leaving a significant gap in our understanding of existing MPAs and future protection requirements. We assess the overlap of global MPAs with the ranges of 17,348 marine species (fishes, mammals, invertebrates), and find that 97.4% of species have <10% of their ranges represented in stricter conservation classes. Almost all (99.8%) of the very poorly represented species (<2% coverage) are found within exclusive economic zones, suggesting an important role for particular nations to better protect biodiversity. Our results offer strategic guidance on where MPAs should be placed to support the CBD’s overall goal to avert biodiversity loss. Achieving this goal is imperative for nature and humanity, as people depend on biodiversity for important and valuable services. Nature Publishing Group 2015-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4668359/ /pubmed/26631984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep17539 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Klein, Carissa J.
Brown, Christopher J.
Halpern, Benjamin S.
Segan, Daniel B.
McGowan, Jennifer
Beger, Maria
Watson, James E.M.
Shortfalls in the global protected area network at representing marine biodiversity
title Shortfalls in the global protected area network at representing marine biodiversity
title_full Shortfalls in the global protected area network at representing marine biodiversity
title_fullStr Shortfalls in the global protected area network at representing marine biodiversity
title_full_unstemmed Shortfalls in the global protected area network at representing marine biodiversity
title_short Shortfalls in the global protected area network at representing marine biodiversity
title_sort shortfalls in the global protected area network at representing marine biodiversity
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4668359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26631984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep17539
work_keys_str_mv AT kleincarissaj shortfallsintheglobalprotectedareanetworkatrepresentingmarinebiodiversity
AT brownchristopherj shortfallsintheglobalprotectedareanetworkatrepresentingmarinebiodiversity
AT halpernbenjamins shortfallsintheglobalprotectedareanetworkatrepresentingmarinebiodiversity
AT segandanielb shortfallsintheglobalprotectedareanetworkatrepresentingmarinebiodiversity
AT mcgowanjennifer shortfallsintheglobalprotectedareanetworkatrepresentingmarinebiodiversity
AT begermaria shortfallsintheglobalprotectedareanetworkatrepresentingmarinebiodiversity
AT watsonjamesem shortfallsintheglobalprotectedareanetworkatrepresentingmarinebiodiversity