Cargando…
Comparison of the diagnostic yield of medical and dental referrals an oral and maxillofacial 2 weeks rule clinic
BACKGROUND: The 2 weeks wait clinic initiative is used as a fast track referral process, to assess patients with suspected cancer. The United Kingdom's National Institute of Clinical Excellence has issued guidelines for which patients should be referred to this service for suspected oral, head...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4668733/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26668453 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0975-5950.168222 |
_version_ | 1782404020233568256 |
---|---|
author | Piggott, Liam |
author_facet | Piggott, Liam |
author_sort | Piggott, Liam |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The 2 weeks wait clinic initiative is used as a fast track referral process, to assess patients with suspected cancer. The United Kingdom's National Institute of Clinical Excellence has issued guidelines for which patients should be referred to this service for suspected oral, head and neck cancers. Both general medical practitioners (GMPs) and general dental practitioners (GDPs) can refer to this service. OBJECTIVE: To ascertain how many of the 2 weeks rule referrals resulted in positive oncology cases. Also, to compare the diagnostic yield of cancer diagnoses between referrals from GMPs and GDPs. METHODS: Collection and analysis of 2 weeks rule referrals and the clinical outcome for these patients, to an oral and maxillofacial surgery unit for a 6 months period. RESULTS: Overall, 65% of the patients seen in the clinic were referred by a GMP and 12.5% of these had a diagnosis of cancer. The remaining 35% were referred by a GDP and 10% of these had cancer. There was no statistically significant different diagnostic yield between the two groups. CONCLUSION: A significant number of patients with confirmed cancer are referred from medically qualified practitioners. Further awareness and education of oral, head and neck cancers is warranted in this group, including at an undergraduate level. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4668733 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46687332015-12-14 Comparison of the diagnostic yield of medical and dental referrals an oral and maxillofacial 2 weeks rule clinic Piggott, Liam Natl J Maxillofac Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: The 2 weeks wait clinic initiative is used as a fast track referral process, to assess patients with suspected cancer. The United Kingdom's National Institute of Clinical Excellence has issued guidelines for which patients should be referred to this service for suspected oral, head and neck cancers. Both general medical practitioners (GMPs) and general dental practitioners (GDPs) can refer to this service. OBJECTIVE: To ascertain how many of the 2 weeks rule referrals resulted in positive oncology cases. Also, to compare the diagnostic yield of cancer diagnoses between referrals from GMPs and GDPs. METHODS: Collection and analysis of 2 weeks rule referrals and the clinical outcome for these patients, to an oral and maxillofacial surgery unit for a 6 months period. RESULTS: Overall, 65% of the patients seen in the clinic were referred by a GMP and 12.5% of these had a diagnosis of cancer. The remaining 35% were referred by a GDP and 10% of these had cancer. There was no statistically significant different diagnostic yield between the two groups. CONCLUSION: A significant number of patients with confirmed cancer are referred from medically qualified practitioners. Further awareness and education of oral, head and neck cancers is warranted in this group, including at an undergraduate level. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4668733/ /pubmed/26668453 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0975-5950.168222 Text en Copyright: © National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Piggott, Liam Comparison of the diagnostic yield of medical and dental referrals an oral and maxillofacial 2 weeks rule clinic |
title | Comparison of the diagnostic yield of medical and dental referrals an oral and maxillofacial 2 weeks rule clinic |
title_full | Comparison of the diagnostic yield of medical and dental referrals an oral and maxillofacial 2 weeks rule clinic |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the diagnostic yield of medical and dental referrals an oral and maxillofacial 2 weeks rule clinic |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the diagnostic yield of medical and dental referrals an oral and maxillofacial 2 weeks rule clinic |
title_short | Comparison of the diagnostic yield of medical and dental referrals an oral and maxillofacial 2 weeks rule clinic |
title_sort | comparison of the diagnostic yield of medical and dental referrals an oral and maxillofacial 2 weeks rule clinic |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4668733/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26668453 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0975-5950.168222 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT piggottliam comparisonofthediagnosticyieldofmedicalanddentalreferralsanoralandmaxillofacial2weeksruleclinic |