Cargando…

Is the Concept of Avian Pathogenic Escherichia coli as a Single Pathotype Fundamentally Flawed?

Avian Pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) is a major pathogen within the poultry industry. However disease, especially in broiler chickens, may be caused by range of E. coli genotypes that carry few, if any, virulence factors associated with APEC. Furthermore, commensal E. coli in the intestines of h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Collingwood, Charlotte, Kemmett, Kirsty, Williams, Nicola, Wigley, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4668852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26664913
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2014.00005
_version_ 1782404030225448960
author Collingwood, Charlotte
Kemmett, Kirsty
Williams, Nicola
Wigley, Paul
author_facet Collingwood, Charlotte
Kemmett, Kirsty
Williams, Nicola
Wigley, Paul
author_sort Collingwood, Charlotte
collection PubMed
description Avian Pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) is a major pathogen within the poultry industry. However disease, especially in broiler chickens, may be caused by range of E. coli genotypes that carry few, if any, virulence factors associated with APEC. Furthermore, commensal E. coli in the intestines of healthy birds may carry an array of APEC virulence factors suggesting they have potential to cause disease when opportunity arises. Given the diseases caused by APEC, namely colibacillosis and salpingitis peritonitis syndrome, are syndromic in nature and the great diversity of the strains causing disease we suggest it is wrong to consider disease as the result of a single APEC pathotype. Whilst it is clear certain pathogenic E. coli can be considered as APEC, much of the disease-associated with E. coli in domestic poultry is as much a consequence of increased host susceptibility due to stress, immunosuppression, co-infection, or poor welfare. This leads to more “opportunistic” infections rather than the result of infection with a specific pathotype. As such the current use of the term APEC for all cases of E. coli infection in the chicken is fundamentally flawed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4668852
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46688522015-12-10 Is the Concept of Avian Pathogenic Escherichia coli as a Single Pathotype Fundamentally Flawed? Collingwood, Charlotte Kemmett, Kirsty Williams, Nicola Wigley, Paul Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science Avian Pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) is a major pathogen within the poultry industry. However disease, especially in broiler chickens, may be caused by range of E. coli genotypes that carry few, if any, virulence factors associated with APEC. Furthermore, commensal E. coli in the intestines of healthy birds may carry an array of APEC virulence factors suggesting they have potential to cause disease when opportunity arises. Given the diseases caused by APEC, namely colibacillosis and salpingitis peritonitis syndrome, are syndromic in nature and the great diversity of the strains causing disease we suggest it is wrong to consider disease as the result of a single APEC pathotype. Whilst it is clear certain pathogenic E. coli can be considered as APEC, much of the disease-associated with E. coli in domestic poultry is as much a consequence of increased host susceptibility due to stress, immunosuppression, co-infection, or poor welfare. This leads to more “opportunistic” infections rather than the result of infection with a specific pathotype. As such the current use of the term APEC for all cases of E. coli infection in the chicken is fundamentally flawed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4668852/ /pubmed/26664913 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2014.00005 Text en Copyright © 2014 Collingwood, Kemmett, Williams and Wigley. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Collingwood, Charlotte
Kemmett, Kirsty
Williams, Nicola
Wigley, Paul
Is the Concept of Avian Pathogenic Escherichia coli as a Single Pathotype Fundamentally Flawed?
title Is the Concept of Avian Pathogenic Escherichia coli as a Single Pathotype Fundamentally Flawed?
title_full Is the Concept of Avian Pathogenic Escherichia coli as a Single Pathotype Fundamentally Flawed?
title_fullStr Is the Concept of Avian Pathogenic Escherichia coli as a Single Pathotype Fundamentally Flawed?
title_full_unstemmed Is the Concept of Avian Pathogenic Escherichia coli as a Single Pathotype Fundamentally Flawed?
title_short Is the Concept of Avian Pathogenic Escherichia coli as a Single Pathotype Fundamentally Flawed?
title_sort is the concept of avian pathogenic escherichia coli as a single pathotype fundamentally flawed?
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4668852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26664913
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2014.00005
work_keys_str_mv AT collingwoodcharlotte istheconceptofavianpathogenicescherichiacoliasasinglepathotypefundamentallyflawed
AT kemmettkirsty istheconceptofavianpathogenicescherichiacoliasasinglepathotypefundamentallyflawed
AT williamsnicola istheconceptofavianpathogenicescherichiacoliasasinglepathotypefundamentallyflawed
AT wigleypaul istheconceptofavianpathogenicescherichiacoliasasinglepathotypefundamentallyflawed