Cargando…

Social affiliation and contact patterns among white-tailed deer in disparate landscapes: implications for disease transmission

In social species, individuals contact members of the same group much more often than those of other groups, particularly for contacts that could directly transmit disease agents. This disparity in contact rates violates the assumptions of simple disease models, hinders disease spread between groups...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schauber, Eric M., Nielsen, Clayton K., Kjær, Lene J., Anderson, Charles W., Storm, Daniel J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4668922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26937044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyu027
_version_ 1782404044499714048
author Schauber, Eric M.
Nielsen, Clayton K.
Kjær, Lene J.
Anderson, Charles W.
Storm, Daniel J.
author_facet Schauber, Eric M.
Nielsen, Clayton K.
Kjær, Lene J.
Anderson, Charles W.
Storm, Daniel J.
author_sort Schauber, Eric M.
collection PubMed
description In social species, individuals contact members of the same group much more often than those of other groups, particularly for contacts that could directly transmit disease agents. This disparity in contact rates violates the assumptions of simple disease models, hinders disease spread between groups, and could decouple disease transmission from population density. Social behavior of white-tailed deer has important implications for the long-term dynamics and impact of diseases such as bovine tuberculosis and chronic wasting disease (CWD), so expanding our understanding of their social system is important. White-tailed deer form matrilineal groups, which inhabit stable home ranges that overlap somewhat with others—a pattern intermediate between mass-action and strict territoriality. To quantify how group membership affects their contact rates and document the spectrum of social affiliation, we analyzed location data from global positioning system (GPS) collars on female and juvenile white-tailed deer in 2 study areas: near Carbondale in forest-dominated southern Illinois (2002–2006) and near Lake Shelbyville in agriculture-dominated central Illinois (2006–2009). For each deer dyad (i.e., 2 individual deer with sufficient overlapping GPS data), we measured space-use overlap, correlation of movements, direct contact rate (simultaneous GPS locations < 10 m apart), and indirect contact rate (GPS locations < 10 m apart when offset by 1 or 3 days). Direct contact rates were substantially higher for within-group dyads than between-group dyads, but group membership had little apparent effect on indirect contact rates. The group membership effect on direct contact rates was strongest in winter and weakest in summer, with no apparent difference between study areas. Social affiliations were not dichotomous, with some deer dyads showing loose but positive affiliation. Even for obvious within-group dyads, their strength of affiliation fluctuated between years, seasons, and even days. Our findings highlight the poor fit between deer behavior and simple models of disease transmission and, combined with previous infection data, suggest that direct contact is the primary driver of CWD transmission among free-living female and juvenile white-tailed deer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4668922
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46689222016-01-26 Social affiliation and contact patterns among white-tailed deer in disparate landscapes: implications for disease transmission Schauber, Eric M. Nielsen, Clayton K. Kjær, Lene J. Anderson, Charles W. Storm, Daniel J. J Mammal Feature Article In social species, individuals contact members of the same group much more often than those of other groups, particularly for contacts that could directly transmit disease agents. This disparity in contact rates violates the assumptions of simple disease models, hinders disease spread between groups, and could decouple disease transmission from population density. Social behavior of white-tailed deer has important implications for the long-term dynamics and impact of diseases such as bovine tuberculosis and chronic wasting disease (CWD), so expanding our understanding of their social system is important. White-tailed deer form matrilineal groups, which inhabit stable home ranges that overlap somewhat with others—a pattern intermediate between mass-action and strict territoriality. To quantify how group membership affects their contact rates and document the spectrum of social affiliation, we analyzed location data from global positioning system (GPS) collars on female and juvenile white-tailed deer in 2 study areas: near Carbondale in forest-dominated southern Illinois (2002–2006) and near Lake Shelbyville in agriculture-dominated central Illinois (2006–2009). For each deer dyad (i.e., 2 individual deer with sufficient overlapping GPS data), we measured space-use overlap, correlation of movements, direct contact rate (simultaneous GPS locations < 10 m apart), and indirect contact rate (GPS locations < 10 m apart when offset by 1 or 3 days). Direct contact rates were substantially higher for within-group dyads than between-group dyads, but group membership had little apparent effect on indirect contact rates. The group membership effect on direct contact rates was strongest in winter and weakest in summer, with no apparent difference between study areas. Social affiliations were not dichotomous, with some deer dyads showing loose but positive affiliation. Even for obvious within-group dyads, their strength of affiliation fluctuated between years, seasons, and even days. Our findings highlight the poor fit between deer behavior and simple models of disease transmission and, combined with previous infection data, suggest that direct contact is the primary driver of CWD transmission among free-living female and juvenile white-tailed deer. Oxford University Press 2015-02-15 2015-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4668922/ /pubmed/26937044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyu027 Text en © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of American Society of Mammalogists. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contactjournals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Feature Article
Schauber, Eric M.
Nielsen, Clayton K.
Kjær, Lene J.
Anderson, Charles W.
Storm, Daniel J.
Social affiliation and contact patterns among white-tailed deer in disparate landscapes: implications for disease transmission
title Social affiliation and contact patterns among white-tailed deer in disparate landscapes: implications for disease transmission
title_full Social affiliation and contact patterns among white-tailed deer in disparate landscapes: implications for disease transmission
title_fullStr Social affiliation and contact patterns among white-tailed deer in disparate landscapes: implications for disease transmission
title_full_unstemmed Social affiliation and contact patterns among white-tailed deer in disparate landscapes: implications for disease transmission
title_short Social affiliation and contact patterns among white-tailed deer in disparate landscapes: implications for disease transmission
title_sort social affiliation and contact patterns among white-tailed deer in disparate landscapes: implications for disease transmission
topic Feature Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4668922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26937044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyu027
work_keys_str_mv AT schauberericm socialaffiliationandcontactpatternsamongwhitetaileddeerindisparatelandscapesimplicationsfordiseasetransmission
AT nielsenclaytonk socialaffiliationandcontactpatternsamongwhitetaileddeerindisparatelandscapesimplicationsfordiseasetransmission
AT kjærlenej socialaffiliationandcontactpatternsamongwhitetaileddeerindisparatelandscapesimplicationsfordiseasetransmission
AT andersoncharlesw socialaffiliationandcontactpatternsamongwhitetaileddeerindisparatelandscapesimplicationsfordiseasetransmission
AT stormdanielj socialaffiliationandcontactpatternsamongwhitetaileddeerindisparatelandscapesimplicationsfordiseasetransmission