Cargando…
Two Distinct Moral Mechanisms for Ascribing and Denying Intentionality
Philosophers and legal scholars have long theorized about how intentionality serves as a critical input for morality and culpability, but the emerging field of experimental philosophy has revealed a puzzling asymmetry. People judge actions leading to negative consequences as being more intentional t...
Autores principales: | Ngo, Lawrence, Kelly, Meagan, Coutlee, Christopher G., Carter, R. McKell, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter, Huettel, Scott A. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4669441/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26634909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep17390 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Learning from silver linings
por: Carter, R. McKell, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
What Makes a Pattern? Matching Decoding Methods to Data in Multivariate Pattern Analysis
por: Kragel, Philip A., et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Activation in the VTA and Nucleus Accumbens Increases in Anticipation of Both Gains and Losses
por: Carter, R. McKell, et al.
Publicado: (2009) -
How Stable are Moral Judgments?
por: Rehren, Paul, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Nucleus Accumbens Mediates Relative Motivation for Rewards in the Absence of Choice
por: Clithero, John A., et al.
Publicado: (2011)