Cargando…

Highlighting consensus among medical scientists increases public support for vaccines: evidence from a randomized experiment

BACKGROUND: A substantial minority of American adults continue to hold influential misperceptions about childhood vaccine safety. Growing public concern and refusal to vaccinate poses a serious public health risk. Evaluations of recent pro-vaccine health communication interventions have revealed mix...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Linden, Sander L., Clarke, Chris E., Maibach, Edward W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4669673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26635296
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2541-4
_version_ 1782404141852655616
author van der Linden, Sander L.
Clarke, Chris E.
Maibach, Edward W.
author_facet van der Linden, Sander L.
Clarke, Chris E.
Maibach, Edward W.
author_sort van der Linden, Sander L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A substantial minority of American adults continue to hold influential misperceptions about childhood vaccine safety. Growing public concern and refusal to vaccinate poses a serious public health risk. Evaluations of recent pro-vaccine health communication interventions have revealed mixed results (at best). This study investigated whether highlighting consensus among medical scientists about childhood vaccine safety can lower public concern, reduce key misperceptions about the discredited autism-vaccine link and promote overall support for vaccines. METHODS: American adults (N = 206) were invited participate in an online survey experiment. Participants were randomly assigned to either a control group or to one of three treatment interventions. The treatment messages were based on expert-consensus estimates and either normatively described or prescribed the extant medical consensus: “90 % of medical scientists agree that vaccines are safe and that all parents should be required to vaccinate their children”. RESULTS: Compared to the control group, the consensus-messages significantly reduced vaccine concern (M = 3.51 vs. M = 2.93, p < 0.01) and belief in the vaccine-autism-link (M = 3.07 vs M = 2.15, p < 0.01) while increasing perceived consensus about vaccine safety (M = 83.93 vs M = 89.80, p < 0.01) and public support for vaccines (M = 5.66 vs M = 6.22, p < 0.01). Mediation analysis further revealed that the public’s understanding of the level of scientific agreement acts as an important “gateway” belief by promoting public attitudes and policy support for vaccines directly as well as indirectly by reducing endorsement of the discredited autism-vaccine link. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that emphasizing the medical consensus about (childhood) vaccine safety is likely to be an effective pro-vaccine message that could help prevent current immunization rates from declining. We recommend that clinicians and public health officials highlight and communicate the high degree of medical consensus on (childhood) vaccine safety when possible. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-015-2541-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4669673
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46696732015-12-05 Highlighting consensus among medical scientists increases public support for vaccines: evidence from a randomized experiment van der Linden, Sander L. Clarke, Chris E. Maibach, Edward W. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: A substantial minority of American adults continue to hold influential misperceptions about childhood vaccine safety. Growing public concern and refusal to vaccinate poses a serious public health risk. Evaluations of recent pro-vaccine health communication interventions have revealed mixed results (at best). This study investigated whether highlighting consensus among medical scientists about childhood vaccine safety can lower public concern, reduce key misperceptions about the discredited autism-vaccine link and promote overall support for vaccines. METHODS: American adults (N = 206) were invited participate in an online survey experiment. Participants were randomly assigned to either a control group or to one of three treatment interventions. The treatment messages were based on expert-consensus estimates and either normatively described or prescribed the extant medical consensus: “90 % of medical scientists agree that vaccines are safe and that all parents should be required to vaccinate their children”. RESULTS: Compared to the control group, the consensus-messages significantly reduced vaccine concern (M = 3.51 vs. M = 2.93, p < 0.01) and belief in the vaccine-autism-link (M = 3.07 vs M = 2.15, p < 0.01) while increasing perceived consensus about vaccine safety (M = 83.93 vs M = 89.80, p < 0.01) and public support for vaccines (M = 5.66 vs M = 6.22, p < 0.01). Mediation analysis further revealed that the public’s understanding of the level of scientific agreement acts as an important “gateway” belief by promoting public attitudes and policy support for vaccines directly as well as indirectly by reducing endorsement of the discredited autism-vaccine link. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that emphasizing the medical consensus about (childhood) vaccine safety is likely to be an effective pro-vaccine message that could help prevent current immunization rates from declining. We recommend that clinicians and public health officials highlight and communicate the high degree of medical consensus on (childhood) vaccine safety when possible. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-015-2541-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4669673/ /pubmed/26635296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2541-4 Text en © van der Linden et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
van der Linden, Sander L.
Clarke, Chris E.
Maibach, Edward W.
Highlighting consensus among medical scientists increases public support for vaccines: evidence from a randomized experiment
title Highlighting consensus among medical scientists increases public support for vaccines: evidence from a randomized experiment
title_full Highlighting consensus among medical scientists increases public support for vaccines: evidence from a randomized experiment
title_fullStr Highlighting consensus among medical scientists increases public support for vaccines: evidence from a randomized experiment
title_full_unstemmed Highlighting consensus among medical scientists increases public support for vaccines: evidence from a randomized experiment
title_short Highlighting consensus among medical scientists increases public support for vaccines: evidence from a randomized experiment
title_sort highlighting consensus among medical scientists increases public support for vaccines: evidence from a randomized experiment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4669673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26635296
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2541-4
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderlindensanderl highlightingconsensusamongmedicalscientistsincreasespublicsupportforvaccinesevidencefromarandomizedexperiment
AT clarkechrise highlightingconsensusamongmedicalscientistsincreasespublicsupportforvaccinesevidencefromarandomizedexperiment
AT maibachedwardw highlightingconsensusamongmedicalscientistsincreasespublicsupportforvaccinesevidencefromarandomizedexperiment