Cargando…
On the pitfalls of peer review
The review process of academic, scientific research and its basic tenets is considered, thereby distinguishing between (i) reviewing of manuscripts to be published in the scientific literature, (ii) reviewing of research proposals to be financed by funding agencies, (iii) reviewing of educational or...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
| Lenguaje: | English |
| Publicado: |
F1000Research
2015
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4669999/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26675931 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.7342.1 |
| _version_ | 1782404199175159808 |
|---|---|
| author | van Gunsteren, Wilfred |
| author_facet | van Gunsteren, Wilfred |
| author_sort | van Gunsteren, Wilfred |
| collection | PubMed |
| description | The review process of academic, scientific research and its basic tenets is considered, thereby distinguishing between (i) reviewing of manuscripts to be published in the scientific literature, (ii) reviewing of research proposals to be financed by funding agencies, (iii) reviewing of educational or research institutions with respect to their proper functioning, and (iv) reviewing of scientists with the aim of appointing or tenuring faculty. |
| format | Online Article Text |
| id | pubmed-4669999 |
| institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2015 |
| publisher | F1000Research |
| record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
| spelling | pubmed-46699992015-12-14 On the pitfalls of peer review van Gunsteren, Wilfred F1000Res Opinion Article The review process of academic, scientific research and its basic tenets is considered, thereby distinguishing between (i) reviewing of manuscripts to be published in the scientific literature, (ii) reviewing of research proposals to be financed by funding agencies, (iii) reviewing of educational or research institutions with respect to their proper functioning, and (iv) reviewing of scientists with the aim of appointing or tenuring faculty. F1000Research 2015-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4669999/ /pubmed/26675931 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.7342.1 Text en Copyright: © 2015 van Gunsteren W http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| spellingShingle | Opinion Article van Gunsteren, Wilfred On the pitfalls of peer review |
| title | On the pitfalls of peer review |
| title_full | On the pitfalls of peer review |
| title_fullStr | On the pitfalls of peer review |
| title_full_unstemmed | On the pitfalls of peer review |
| title_short | On the pitfalls of peer review |
| title_sort | on the pitfalls of peer review |
| topic | Opinion Article |
| url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4669999/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26675931 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.7342.1 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT vangunsterenwilfred onthepitfallsofpeerreview |