Cargando…
On the pitfalls of peer review
The review process of academic, scientific research and its basic tenets is considered, thereby distinguishing between (i) reviewing of manuscripts to be published in the scientific literature, (ii) reviewing of research proposals to be financed by funding agencies, (iii) reviewing of educational or...
Autor principal: | van Gunsteren, Wilfred |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000Research
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4669999/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26675931 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.7342.1 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Why training and specialization is needed for peer review: a case study of peer review for randomized controlled trials
por: Patel, Jigisha
Publicado: (2014) -
Peer review: Pearls and pitfalls
por: Datta, Rakesh
Publicado: (2021) -
Retractions, Fake Peer Reviews, and Paper Mills
por: Rivera, Horacio, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: advantages and pitfalls
por: Oh, Bermseok
Publicado: (2019) -
Ten considerations for open peer review
por: Schmidt, Birgit, et al.
Publicado: (2018)