Cargando…

Risk assessment based on indirect predation cues: revisiting fine‐grained variation

To adaptively express inducible defenses, prey must gauge risk based on indirect cues of predation. However, the information contained in indirect cues that enable prey to fine‐tune their phenotypes to variation in risk is still unclear. In aquatic systems, research has focused on cue concentration...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCoy, Michael W., Wheat, Stefan K., Warkentin, Karen M., Vonesh, James R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4670059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26668719
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1552
_version_ 1782404206937767936
author McCoy, Michael W.
Wheat, Stefan K.
Warkentin, Karen M.
Vonesh, James R.
author_facet McCoy, Michael W.
Wheat, Stefan K.
Warkentin, Karen M.
Vonesh, James R.
author_sort McCoy, Michael W.
collection PubMed
description To adaptively express inducible defenses, prey must gauge risk based on indirect cues of predation. However, the information contained in indirect cues that enable prey to fine‐tune their phenotypes to variation in risk is still unclear. In aquatic systems, research has focused on cue concentration as the key variable driving threat‐sensitive responses to risk. However, while risk is measured as individuals killed per time, cue concentration may vary with either the number or biomass killed. Alternatively, fine‐grained variation in cue, that is, frequency of cue pulses irrespective of concentration, may provide a more reliable signal of risk. Here, we present results from laboratory experiments that examine the relationship between red‐eyed treefrog tadpole growth and total cue, cue per pulse, and cue pulse frequency. We also reanalyze an earlier study that examined the effect of fine‐grained variation in predator cues on wood frog tadpole growth. Both studies show growth declines with increasing cue pulse frequency, even though individual pulses in high‐frequency treatments contained very little cue. This result suggests that counter to earlier conclusions, tadpoles are using fine‐grained variation in cue arising from the number of predation events to assess and respond to predation risk, as predicted by consumer–resource theory.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4670059
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46700592015-12-14 Risk assessment based on indirect predation cues: revisiting fine‐grained variation McCoy, Michael W. Wheat, Stefan K. Warkentin, Karen M. Vonesh, James R. Ecol Evol Original Research To adaptively express inducible defenses, prey must gauge risk based on indirect cues of predation. However, the information contained in indirect cues that enable prey to fine‐tune their phenotypes to variation in risk is still unclear. In aquatic systems, research has focused on cue concentration as the key variable driving threat‐sensitive responses to risk. However, while risk is measured as individuals killed per time, cue concentration may vary with either the number or biomass killed. Alternatively, fine‐grained variation in cue, that is, frequency of cue pulses irrespective of concentration, may provide a more reliable signal of risk. Here, we present results from laboratory experiments that examine the relationship between red‐eyed treefrog tadpole growth and total cue, cue per pulse, and cue pulse frequency. We also reanalyze an earlier study that examined the effect of fine‐grained variation in predator cues on wood frog tadpole growth. Both studies show growth declines with increasing cue pulse frequency, even though individual pulses in high‐frequency treatments contained very little cue. This result suggests that counter to earlier conclusions, tadpoles are using fine‐grained variation in cue arising from the number of predation events to assess and respond to predation risk, as predicted by consumer–resource theory. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4670059/ /pubmed/26668719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1552 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
McCoy, Michael W.
Wheat, Stefan K.
Warkentin, Karen M.
Vonesh, James R.
Risk assessment based on indirect predation cues: revisiting fine‐grained variation
title Risk assessment based on indirect predation cues: revisiting fine‐grained variation
title_full Risk assessment based on indirect predation cues: revisiting fine‐grained variation
title_fullStr Risk assessment based on indirect predation cues: revisiting fine‐grained variation
title_full_unstemmed Risk assessment based on indirect predation cues: revisiting fine‐grained variation
title_short Risk assessment based on indirect predation cues: revisiting fine‐grained variation
title_sort risk assessment based on indirect predation cues: revisiting fine‐grained variation
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4670059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26668719
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1552
work_keys_str_mv AT mccoymichaelw riskassessmentbasedonindirectpredationcuesrevisitingfinegrainedvariation
AT wheatstefank riskassessmentbasedonindirectpredationcuesrevisitingfinegrainedvariation
AT warkentinkarenm riskassessmentbasedonindirectpredationcuesrevisitingfinegrainedvariation
AT voneshjamesr riskassessmentbasedonindirectpredationcuesrevisitingfinegrainedvariation